The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Lisa Mascaro and Kate Linthicum, Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Failing to agree on how to handle the crush of children on the Southwestern border, Congress has stalemated amid a fresh round of political brinkmanship that is likely to prolong the crisis and increase federal costs involved.

Rather than compromise over the White House’s request for $3.7 billion to handle the situation, Congress devolved Wednesday into standoff as each side waited for the other to yield on the politically heated issue.

Now, as agencies begin to run out of funds to handle the crisis, the days are dwindling before next week’s adjournment for the August congressional recess.

“We have a refugees crisis on our Southern border,” thundered a clearly frustrated Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) on the Senate floor. “This is about right here, in our own front yard.”

More than 52,000 unaccompanied minors, mostly from Central America, have flocked across the border since October, driven by violence in their homelands and rumors that they would be allowed to stay in the United States indefinitely.

The House and Senate introduced proposals this week that would deal with the problem, largely by providing the administration emergency funds to care for the children, review their cases, and probably return most of them to their home countries.

Both chambers pared Obama’s request for two years of emergency funds to just this year; the Senate is offering $2.7 billion and the House $1.5 billion.

But that is about where the similarities end.

Ever since the White House suggested it would like to change a 2008 anti-trafficking law to make it easier to deport unaccompanied minors, that issue has become the battleground in the debate.
Advocates for the children swiftly rejected that idea, which they argued would all but do away with judicial hearings for the children by leaving their cases at the discretion of Border Patrol agents.

Similarly, various proposals in Congress that would try to speed up legal proceedings to a maximum seven days — they can now drag out for more than a year, a reality that results in many migrants simply remaining in the United States — also have been rejected by those working with the children.

“We will be asking kidnapping and child-rape victims to provide testimony and corroborating evidence in court about the single most horrifying thing that has ever happened to them within one week,” said Lindsay Toczylowski, an immigration attorney at Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project, who is part of a coalition of California-based legal service providers opposed to changes to the law. She said Border Patrol agents lacked the training to make crucial decisions in complex asylum cases.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who was in Los Angeles to speak at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, said in an interview that the law’s current protections were there for a reason.

“Anything that is meant to streamline a system for the sake of speed, as opposed to the sake of justice and due process, is something I cannot support,” Harris said.

Most Democrats — including top congressional leaders — have joined the advocates’ side. The administration has slowed its push to amend the anti-trafficking law, even though Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has testified in Congress that his department needs flexibility in dealing with the problem.

But Republicans have latched on to the proposal to change the 2008 law as the main solution to stem the crisis.

House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-OH), wrote in a letter Wednesday to President Barack Obama: “It is difficult to see how we can make progress on this issue without strong, public support from the White House for much-needed reforms, including changes to the 2008 law. I hope you will take the earliest possible opportunity to voice your continued support for common-sense efforts to stem the flow of children to our border.”

Boehner has his own reasons for pushing the president. A House GOP working group’s proposal released Wednesday was unlikely to have a majority of the GOP votes needed for passage, lawmakers said. It called for various measures, such as revising the 2008 law and stepping up border security.

Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL) said he was inclined “not to support it” because of the costs and his preference for enforcing existing immigration laws.

Even those who often have influence in the GOP, including Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for more restrictive immigration laws, were not enthusiastic about changing the 2008 law, saying provisions within it give Obama the power to limit its application without input from Congress.

“I don’t think that Congress should be focusing on changing it because it simply confirms the president’s false narrative that his hands are tied and the border crisis is caused by this law,” Krikorian said.

In the Senate, Democrats tried to entice Republicans to support the administration’s funding request by trimming it to $2.7 billion and including $225 million for the Iron Dome missile defense system in Israel amid the crisis in Gaza.

Democrats believed the antimissile funding would be too tough for Republican allies of Israel to resist, but GOP senators took a pass Wednesday, seeing through the effort as “so transparent,” said Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

Senate Republicans believe public opinion is on their side with support for changing the 2008 law in a way that would allow speedy removal of the children, and that Democrats will have no alternative but to yield.

“They’ll cave,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

Mascaro of the Tribune Washington Bureau reported from Washington and Linthicum of the Los Angeles Times from Los Angeles.

AFP Photo

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the MAGA movement and far-right Christian fundamentalists have downplayed its severity — inspiring critics to slam MAGA as a suicidal "death cult." Christian fundamentalist Joy Pullmann, in a shocking op-ed published by the far-right website The Federalist on the day of Gen. Colin Powell's death, argues that Christians should welcome death from COVID-19, like any other cause of death, as "a good thing." And she attacks the "pagan assumptions" of those who argue in favor of widespread vaccination.

"For Christians, death is good," Pullmann writes. "Yes, death is also an evil — its existence is a result of sin. But thanks be to God, Jesus Christ has redeemed even death. In his resurrection, Christ has transformed death into a portal to eternal life for Christians…. The Christian faith makes it very clear that death, while sad to those left behind and a tragic consequence of human sin, is now good for all who believe in Christ."

Keep reading... Show less

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Don Winslow, the author of several New York Times bestsellers, blasted Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) in a newly-released video shared on social media.

For months now, Manchin has positioned himself as one of the main roadblocks of President Joe Biden's proposed Build Back Better agenda, pushing back on key provisions including child tax credits and climate initiatives.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}