The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Chicago (AFP) – A federal judge Monday overturned a controversial restriction imposed on abortion providers in Texas, deeming it an unconstitutional “undue burden” on women seeking to terminate pregnancies.

The restriction – which was set to go in effect Tuesday – was among a host of new rules which critics say would have forced all but five of the sprawling state’s 42 clinics to close.

Abortion is a key hot-button issue in U.S. politics. Opponents have in recent years imposed a host of restrictions aimed at deterring women from ending their pregnancies and making it harder for clinics to operate.

The Supreme Court has upheld its 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion but has approved of a number of restrictions such as waiting periods and a ban on late-term abortions.

Texas state senator Wendy Davis won national attention with an 11-hour filibuster in June which briefly blocked the controversial bill before it was passed in a special session.

The bill bans all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, limits the use of the abortion pill RU486, imposes expensive new building codes on clinics, and requires abortion providers to get admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

Federal judge Lee Yeakel ruled that the admitting privilege requirement “does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the State in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman’s health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.”

Similar restrictions imposed in Alabama, Mississippi and Wisconsin were also overturned by federal courts.

Many hospitals ban their physicians from performing abortions and will not grant providers admission privileges because their low-risk practices do not result in a high enough volume of admissions, Yeakel noted in a 26-page opinion.

Limits on the use of the abortion pill were upheld because the law includes a provision which accounts for threats to a woman’s health or life, Yeakel ruled. The other restrictions were not addressed in the lawsuit.

Texas Governor Rick Perry vowed to “continue to fight” for the law.

“Today’s decision will not stop our ongoing efforts to protect life and ensure the women of our state aren’t exposed to any more of the abortion-mill horror stories that have made headlines recently,” he said in a statement.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, left, and former President Donald Trump.

Photo by Kevin McCarthy (Public domain)

In the professional stratum of politics, few verities are treated with more reverence than the outcome of next year's midterm, when the Republican Party is deemed certain to recapture majorities in the House and Senate. With weary wisdom, any pol or pundit will cite the long string of elections that buttress this prediction.

Political history also tells us that many factors can influence an electoral result, including a national crisis or a change in economic conditions — in other words, things can change and even midterm elections are not entirely foretold. There have been a few exceptions to this rule, too.

Keep reading... Show less
x

Close