The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

 

On Tuesday, a federal judge flatly rejected the Trump administration’s racist attempt to insert a question about citizenship status into the 2020 census.

Judge Jesse M. Furman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross committed “egregious” violations of the law when he made the “arbitrary and capricious” decision to add the citizenship question.

Asking about citizenship would likely make the census less accurate, because it would discourage many immigrants from returning their census forms. Undercounting minority communities on the census would hurt those communities on a variety of fronts, from congressional representation to funding for roads and schools.

It could also give Republicans an unfair political advantage. If the citizenship question is allowed on the 2020 census, it “could shift the nation’s balance of political power from cities to more rural communities over the next decade and give Republicans a new advantage in drawing electoral boundaries,” the Washington Post reported last year.

Advocates and former census officials alike say it’s a bad idea to add a citizenship question.

“Trump tried to twist the 2020 census into just another weapon in his war on immigrants, aiming to drive down responses and intentionally leading to a less representative government by hiding millions,” Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA), chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC), said in a statement to Shareblue Media. “I’m glad the court has intervened to stop this hastily crafted and dangerous question from distorting our census.”

The judge’s decision was based on how Ross and the administration made the decision to add the citizenship question, not the racist impact of such a question, the New York Times reports.

But it’s still a victory for the plaintiffs, and for those who care about the integrity of the census — at least for now.

“Today’s ruling is a strong signal to the Trump administration that any attempts to politicize and corrupt the 2020 census will fail,” Thomas Wolf, executive director of the Brennan Center for Justice, said in a statement.

“While today’s ruling is a victory, we cannot rely solely on the courts to swat down this xenophobic and politically nefarious question,” Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX), chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said in a statement. “Congress must come together, across party lines, to ensure we protect the census from politicization and ensure every person is counted justly and accurately.”

The Trump administration, of course, has come to be defined by its virulent anti-immigration policies. Trump kicked off his 2016 campaign by calling Mexicans “rapists,” and one of his first acts after his sparsely-attended inauguration was an ill-fated ban on Muslims entering the United States. Trump has defended white supremacists after a hate-filled rally in Charlottesville, denigrated immigrants from Haiti and Africa by claiming they come from “shithole countries,” and instigated the country’s longest government shutdown over a racist attempt to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The attempt to put a citizenship question on the 2020 census is just another in a long line of anti-immigrant racism from the Trump administration. And once again, the courts have to step in to squash the most egregious excesses.

Published with permission of The American Independent. 

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}