The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Kurtis Lee, Los Angeles Times

In a ruling that could have reverberations around the country, a federal judge on Thursday struck down an Ohio law that bars individuals from knowingly making false statements about political candidates.

The decision from District Court Judge Timothy Black follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in June that a political group could proceed with a First Amendment challenge against the Ohio law that criminalizes “false” political speech.

Calling the law unconstitutional, Black wrote in his 25-page ruling that “the answer to false statements in politics is not to force silence, but to encourage truthful speech in response, and to let the voters, not the government, decide what the political truth is.”

He also ordered the state’s Elections Commission to cease enforcing the law and noted that it’s up to lawmakers — and not a court — to rewrite the statute. “There is no reason,” Black said, to believe that the commission is positioned to determine what is true and what is false when it comes to literature and advertisements against candidates.

At its core, the case stems from a 2010 criminal complaint filed by former U.S. Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-OH) against the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion group. That year, as Driehaus faced a tight re-election race, the group planned to post billboard ads that said the Democrat’s support of President Barack Obama’s health care law was in essence support for abortion.

Driehaus, who opposes abortion, cited the Ohio law in his complaint against the Susan B. Anthony List, prompting the owner of the billboards where the ads were set to go on display to not put them up.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, applauded Black’s decision.

“After four years and a trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, today we finally have a victory for free speech,” Dannenfelser said in a statement.

She also said that over the summer more than 20 groups from “across the political spectrum” submitted amicus briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the Susan B. Anthony List prior to its ruling that allowed the federal court to hear the case.

The statute in Ohio has been in effect since 1995. Other states, including Minnesota, have similar laws.

AFP Photo/Mark Wilson

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Trump mob storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Some of the January 6 rioters who are facing federal criminal charges are now saying, as part of their defense, that they were misled, brainwashed or unfairly manipulated by then-President Donald Trump, MAGA media and/or the QAnon cult. And one of the rioters who is using that type of defense is QAnon supporter Doug Jensen, who is saying that he was a "victim" of false information from the far-right conspiracy movement.

Keep reading... Show less