The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Todd Shields, Bloomberg News (TNS)

WASHINGTON — Radio stations and cable TV will soon need to disclose online the political ad spending of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and other candidates — but don’t expect instant clarity.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Thursday is set to bring other media in line with broadcast television, which began disclosing political spending online during the last presidential election campaign. The proposed order, backed by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, includes satellite TV and is expected to be approved.

“For too long, the public could barely access the ‘public’ file. It was maintained only on paper in file cabinets at the actual radio and TV stations,” Wheeler said in a Jan. 7 blog post. “In the Internet age, that didn’t make any sense.”

The order requires the disclosure of ad spending on behalf of candidates for local, state and federal public office on an FCC website but doesn’t specify how the data must be reported. Information may be entered in a hodgepodge of formats, possibly with hand-scribbled amendments, leaving a daunting task for analysts, journalists and others collating totals and divining trends.

“Symbolically it’s great,” said Tim Francisco, a professor at Youngstown State University in Ohio, who has helped students track campaign spending. “We’re increasing the number of files available, but we’re not making them any easier to access.”

The FCC already requires orderly records “of all requests for broadcast time made by or on behalf of a candidate for public office” and the order would move the documentation from paper to online files.

The FCC left out of the order any requirement for the use of machine-readable data. The priority is to bring more information online before considering other changes, said Neil Grace, an agency spokesman.

Measures advanced by Wheeler, a Democrat, typically pass because his party controls three votes on the five-member panel. Broadcasters and cable operators speaking through trade groups didn’t object to placing reports online and asked for eased requirements for smaller operators.

The proposal will probably pass because it doesn’t face opposition and the online requirement hasn’t burdened TV stations, said Andrew Jay Schwartzman, a Washington-based lawyer who works on disclosure issues with the Institute for Public Representation at the Georgetown University Law Center.

The FCC hasn’t forced the disclosure of anonymous donors who fund independent groups behind some political ads, as requested by some policy advocates and members of Congress.

In a Jan. 20 letter, 170 of the U.S. House’s 188 Democrats urged Wheeler to force the disclosure of what they called “the true sponsors” of political ads: “those who contributed the money to pay for it.”

“Groups spending money to influence our elections should be required to publicly release their donors,” said the letter signed by Reps. John Yarmuth, of Kentucky; Anna Eshoo, of California, a leader for telecommunications legislation; and Steny Hoyer, of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House. The FCC has power to reverse an earlier agency decision and demand fuller disclosure, they said. The agency is reviewing the letter, said Grace, the spokesman.

The disclosure issue has dogged Wheeler, a Democrat appointed by President Barack Obama. In 2013, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, now a presidential candidate, blocked a confirmation vote for Wheeler after asking whether he would use the agency to regulate political speech. Cruz, of Texas, relented after Wheeler in a meeting told him that expanding political-ad disclosure wasn’t a priority, according to a statement from Cruz. Grace, the agency spokesman, declined to comment about the meeting.

Democrats have pushed legislation to uncover donors funding independent groups airing ads. Republicans, who control Congress, have blocked the legislation, arguing it poses a threat to free speech. The battle has been raging since the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United that struck down decades-old restriction on corporate and union money in campaigns.

©2016 Bloomberg News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Photo: U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton takes a photo with a supporter at a campaign event in Decorah, Iowa, January 26, 2016. REUTERS/Rick Wilking 

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}