The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Matthew Whitaker, the man Trump appointed as acting attorney general during special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference, despite never being confirmed by the Senate, offered a stunning defense of his former boss on Tuesday night.

“Abuse of power is not a crime,” he argued in a Fox News interview, speaking of the ongoing House impeachment inquiry.

“What evidence of a crime do you have?” he asked host Laura Ingraham. “…Let’s fundamentally boil it down. The Constitution is very clear that this has to be some pretty egregious behavior. And they cannot tell the American people what this case is even about right now, because they have to do it in secret.”

When Trump forced out his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, in late 2018, he temporarily selected Whitaker to take over the Justice Department and assume oversight of the special counsel’s probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Legal experts noted that his appointment may have been unconstitutional, given that he was never Senate-confirmed to any position in the department.

House Democrats have made clear that the impeachment inquiry is focused on Trump’s attempts to pressure Ukraine to investigate one of his 2020 election rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden. Accepting or soliciting election assistance is a crime, according to the Federal Election Commission and Justice Department.

Additionally, Trump’s own chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, admitted to reporters in a press conference last week that Trump had withheld military aid to Ukraine in order to secure such an investigation, as well as a probe into a long-debunked conspiracy theory about the DNC servers. Mulvaney has since attempted to walk back those comments, saying he never admitted the existence of that deal.

Further complicating the matter, Bill Taylor, the current top diplomat for Ukraine, testified before lawmakers this week and confirmed that such a quid pro quo had indeed existed. In a roughly hour-long opening statement, Taylor said that “everything” had depended on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announcing the investigations publicly — including the military aid.

Whitaker’s argument that Trump can abuse power with impunity mirrors Trump’s own comments from 2016, when he claimed he could “could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody” and still maintain the public’s support.

And for good measure, Trump’s attorney, William S. Consovoy ⁠— who has been tasked with shielding Trump’s financial documents from being made public ⁠— argued in court this week that Trump would in fact be immune from criminal investigation even if he did shoot someone.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Meadows

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Legal experts including a Harvard professor and a top election and voting rights attorney are weighing in on Sunday night's bombshell report from Rolling Stone naming members of Congress and the Trump administration who were involved in the planning and organizing of the January 6 rally and/or "Trump's efforts to overturn his election loss," according to two of the planners of the "Stop the Steal" rally.

Keep reading... Show less

Reps. Lauren Boebert, Louie Gohmert and Andy Biggs

Reprinted with permission from DailyKos

Several House Republicans—exactly the ones you would guess—were involved in planning meetings for protests on January 6 as Trump supporters tried to block the certification of the 2020 election and with it, Donald Trump's loss, two sources have detailed to Rolling Stone.
Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}