The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

(UPDATE: On Tuesday evening, Senate Republicans identified the woman they will bring in to question Christine Blasey Ford as Rachel Mitchell, a deputy county attorney and sex crimes prosecutor in Maricopa County, Arizona, where she once worked for Joe Arpaio, the county’s sheriff later convicted on felony charges and then pardoned by Trump. Before her name was released, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell described the outside counsel on Twitter as a “female assistant,” drawing wide derision.)

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee know they have a serious problem. A woman problem. As in, they don’t have any.

Republicans have been attacking, smearing, and undermining Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and her very credible allegation that Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her when they were both in high school. And that’s exactly what they intend to do more of Thursday, when Ford and Kavanaugh testify before the committee.

Letting a group of Republican men viciously attack a woman testifying about sexual assault is a bad look, and they know it. But with only six Republican women in the entire U.S. Senate — and none of them on the Judiciary Committee — the men have taken the incredibly unusual step of hiring a woman to do their dirty work for them.

Committee chair Chuck Grassley of Iowa acknowledged Tuesday that his team had indeed hired a woman to question Ford during Thursday’s hearing. But he’s refusing to say who she is.

“We aren’t announcing the name for her safety,” Grassley said. Not that Grassley has any reason to be concerned for the mystery woman’s safety, he admitted. They’re “just being cautious” anyway.

Last week, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who also sits on the committee, floated the possibility of hiring a woman, since the Republicans on the committee have none of their own.

Since then, Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee came right out and said what the fear among those male Republicans is.

“Inadvertently somebody will do something that’s insensitive,” Corker said. Corker isn’t wrong to be concerned. The men in his party have already demonstrated plenty of insensitivity toward Ford.

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, another member of the committee, has dismissed Ford’s story, saying she is “mistaken.” Worse, though, he has said that even if she is not mistaken and Kavanaugh really did try to rape her, he is still a “good man” who belongs on the Supreme Court.

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, also on the committee, complained over the weekend that denying Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court because of an allegation of sexual assault would unfairly “ruin” Kavanaugh’s life.

Graham has expressed no concern for Ford, who has spent more than three decades living with her assault, has sought therapy because of it, and was forced to leave her home because of the threats she and her family have received since she went public with her story.

Despite the Republicans’ obvious plan to shove Kavanaugh on the court, regardless of the testimony against him or any other allegations that have come out, they desperately want to avoid looking sexist. They’re even complaining about how bad they look — and trying to blame Democrats for it.

But they have only themselves to blame. The GOP has a problem with women, something that has been made worse by making an admitted sexual predator the leader of their party.

Now Republicans are running an ugly and unbelievably misogynistic campaign to put an alleged sexual predator on the highest court in the land. And they’re hoping they can fool the American public by hiring a woman to hide behind.

Published with permission of The American Independent.



Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}