The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Timothy M. Phelps, Tribune Washington Bureau (TNS)

WASHINGTON — In a rare Supreme Court victory for the voting rights of minorities, the justices ruled 5-4 Wednesday that a lower court must reassess whether Alabama improperly packed too many black voters into certain districts, diluting their voting strength in other districts.

Justice Stephen Breyer said there was “strong, perhaps overwhelming evidence” that in the one state Senate district examined closely in the court record, race had been used impermissibly as a criteria, and that other districts had apparently been drawn in a similar manner.

The justices sent the case back to a special three-judge court to evaluate each state district in contention. Blacks and Democrats had complained that their own strategy of creating minority-controlled voting districts — used in previous decades to improve minority representation — was now being used against them to limit their overall influence in the state.

The opinion raised an angry cry of protest from Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Scalia called it a “sweeping holding that will have profound implications” in the future. “If the court’s destination seems fantastical, just wait until you see the journey,” Scalia said in an opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Thomas.

Thomas said in a separate dissent that “this is nothing more than a fight over the ‘best’ racial quota.”

Photo: Barack Obama via Flickr

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Chuck Grassley

Reprinted with permission from DailyKos

Last year, Senate Republicans were already feeling so desperate about their upcoming midterm prospects that they rushed to wish Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa a speedy and full recovery from COVID-19 so that he could run for reelection in 2022. The power of incumbency is a huge advantage for any politician, and Republicans were clinging to the idea of sending Grassley—who will be 89 when the '22 general election rolls around—back to the upper chamber for another six-year term.

Keep reading... Show less

Close