The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

 

How much are you paying Amazon? I don’t mean how much you’re shelling out for that set of bed linens or the latest computer gizmo you bought. No, no. I’m asking how much money you and your neighbors are simply giving to the world’s largest and richest online retailer.

If you live in Indianapolis; Newark, New Jersey; Miami; Austin; Philly; Chicago; Atlanta; or 13 other lucky cities, congratulations, for you’re a finalist in the magnificent “Throw Your Money At Amazon” Sweepstakes! It’s like Bonnie & Clyde but on a corporate scale. And instead of robbing banks, Amazon has enticed city and state officials to rob their own citizens and then hand over the loot in the form of tax breaks, cash grants, land and other bribes to Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon and America’s wealthiest human. The locality that offers the most booty “wins” the grand prize of having this thieving corporate behemoth become its new neighbor. At least until Bezos gets a better offer.

So, again I ask: How big of a pile of your tax dollars and public assets are your officials offering?

Shhhh, it’s a secret. Nearly all of the 20 official accomplices to this grand larceny are pulling it off in the dark, not even telling city council members (much less taxpayers) how many billions they’re throwing at Bezos. Making the deals even shadier, many cities turned their negotiations over to such business associations as the chamber of commerce, letting this handful of unelected, self-interested private elites secretly make binding promises that would affect the entire public without consulting or even informing them. In the few cases where information has been released, it’s amounted to an unfunny joke — Montgomery County, Maryland, for example, issued a 10-page document listing “incentives” it was offering, but every word on every page was blacked out!

This whole flimflam is abominable and ought to be criminal. Amazon will rake in a quarter-trillion dollars in sales this year, and Bezos is sitting on $166 billion in personal wealth. Shame on him for demanding public handouts, and shame on local officials for robbing the public till to further bloat his ego and fortune.

As any CEO will tell you, corporations are no-nonsense problem-solving organizations. When trouble pops up and things get sticky, chief executives don’t just wring their hands and try to dodge the issue. No-siree, the chief gets paid the big bucks to step forward confidently and seize control … by ringing up the company’s consultants and having them try to dodge the issue.

Bezos is figuring this out. The uber-rich mega-peddler of everything — from sex toys to military espionage systems — has been hit with a long string of exposés about the corporation’s nasty practices. From profiteering as a flagrant tax dodger and predatory killer of independent local businesses, to running a massive network of publicly subsidized warehouses with sweatshop labor, Amazon’s carefully crafted image as a “cool” company is … well, getting fried in negative headlines and online chatter.

Thus, Bezos (known for thinking outside the cage) has hired a flock of tweety birds who the corporation says are former warehouse workers, paying them to tweet full time about how absolutely wonderful the warehouse jobs are. The air circulation in the warehouses, the tweeters tell us, is “very good”; in a 10-hour shift, they assure us, lucky workers get not one but two 30-minute breaks; and workers are even allowed bathroom breaks (within reason, of course). Bezos has given this select group of Twitter testifiers the title of Amazon “ambassadors,” and each of their Twitter accounts looks exactly alike, complete with the corporate smile logo atop their page.

Amazon’s PR flacks insist that the tweeters are not scripted or told what to write. But imagine if they were to write something “unapproved.” And note that Amazon won’t let reporters interview any of them.

As Sen. Bernie Sanders, the diligent corporate watchdog, put it, “If Amazon actually paid all its workers a living wage and treated them with dignity, they would not have to pay dozens of people to tweet all day.”

Populist author, public speaker, and radio commentator Jim Hightower writes The Hightower Lowdown, a monthly newsletter chronicling the ongoing fights by America’s ordinary people against rule by plutocratic elites. Sign up at HightowerLowdown.org.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}