The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Investigating FBI Conspiracy To ‘Spy’ On Trump, Barr Will Find…Nothing

Two or three news cycles back, the Prevaricator in Chief made a shocking allegation. Or, that is to say, a charge that would be astonishing and unsettling coming from any president but him:

My Campaign for President was conclusively spied on,” Trump thundered on Twitter. “Nothing like this has ever happened in American Politics. A really bad situation. TREASON means long jail sentences, and this was TREASON!”

Coming only days after Attorney General William Barr tasked a U.S. Attorney with reviewing (yet again) the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, the allegation was nonsense on its face. As defined in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, “[t]reason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” It’s punishable by death.

But a presidential campaign is not the United States. Constitutionally speaking, it’s essentially nothing. As usual, Trump was simply blowing smoke. Even so, some of his detractors took the bait. CNN legal commentator Jeffrey Toobin called the president’s outburst a “grotesque abuse of power.”

Grotesque, yes. Also ridiculous.

Because it’s highly unlikely that anything’s going to happen. The attorney general’s various pronouncements on the topic of government “spying,” appear calculated to appeal to an audience of one: Trump himself.

In media interviews, Barr is careful to include a lawyerly escape-hatch, stipulating that what’s normally called “surveillance” when investigators secure legal warrants to conduct it, may indeed have been justifiable.

It’s a cagey game he’s playing. But so far, only a game.

Trump was at it again at a WWF-style campaign rally in Pennsylvania the other night, accusing FBI officials of treason while an enraptured crowd chanted “Lock them up!” (Earlier, they’d jeered “Lock her up!” at the mention of Hillary Clinton’s name.) He praised Barr, asserting that the AG would soon unmask the dark conspiracy against him.

That’s never going to happen for essentially the same reason Hillary Clinton has never been prosecuted for her imagined crimes. Bringing (pardon me) “Trumped-up” charges against prominent individuals with the wherewithal to defend themselves endangers the prosecution more than the defendant.

We don’t yet have show trials in the United States.

Trump can boast all he wants about serving several terms. He did that in Pennsylvania too. But that’s not happening either.

According to believers, the linchpin of the alleged anti-Trump conspiracy is former FBI director James Comey. You remember Comey, right? He’s the ace investigator who wrongly announced that the Feds had dug up shocking new evidence in the Hillary Clinton email probe ten days before the election—thereby costing her the presidency, many believe.

Meanwhile, the agency kept its “Crossfire Hurricane” probe of Trump staffers’ connections to Russian intelligence operatives very quiet. Which you’ve got to admit would be an odd way for anti-Trump conspirators to act.

Just days before the 2016 election, the New York Timespublished a front page article headlined “Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia.” Readers were assured that “even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.”

The Mueller Report, of course, concluded exactly the opposite. Electing Trump was Job One at the Kremlin. Meanwhile, the Trump campaign, if it didn’t necessarily participate in a provable criminal conspiracy, secretly played footsie with Russian intelligence. Its expectation, Mueller concluded, was “that [the campaign] would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

And so it very much did.

Entirely convinced of his own integrity, Comey has mounted his high horse regarding Barr’s insinuations. “The AG should stop sliming his own Department,” he wrote. “If there are bad facts, show us, or search for them professionally and then tell us what you found. An AG must act like the leader of the Department of Justice, an organization based on truth. Donald Trump has enough spokespeople.”

So no, none of these alleged traitors is going down easy, which means they’re not going down at all. Expect a murky report filled with legalistic quibbling. But treason? No how, no way.

Meanwhile, the latest conspiracy theory getting Trumpists all hot and bothered derives from a book by George Papadopoulos, the fired Trump aide whose barroom braggadocio started the whole fool thing. Entitled “Deep State Target,” it portrays its author as the pigeon in a dastardly plot cooked up not by Russians, but U.S., British, Israeli, and Australian intelligence.

History records that it was indeed the perfidious Aussies who tipped U.S. intelligence that a Trump aide was running his mouth in a London bar about the Russians having “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of stolen emails. He also claimed to be keeping company with Vladimir Putin’s niece, and to be on a first-name basis with Benjamin Netanyahu.

Sometimes he makes stuff up, that Papadopoulos.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Youtube Screenshot

In late 2011, John Oliver and his Daily Show cameraman made a trek to my office, then in Providence, Rhode Island, to take me to task. I had recently referred to the Tea Partiers who had pushed America to the brink of a disastrous default as "economic terrorists."

Oliver had apparently swallowed whole a series of barbs directed my way by a Wall Street Journal blogger who didn't seem to like women much. The blogger kept calling me the "Civility diva" and a "Baroness Catherine Ashton lookalike." (A member of the British parliament, Ashton was said to be homely.) He was quite the wit.

Keep reading...Show less

Donald Trump and Mike Pence

Youtube Screenshot

Several mainstream media outlets are manufacturing a political narrative that the discovery of classified documents at the homes of both President Joe Biden and former Vice President Mike Pence should alleviate pressure on disgraced former President Donald Trump, who not only took a vast trove of federal records but also refused to give them back.

Biden and Pence have both cooperated with federal investigators to recover and return documents that belong to the government, and both situations have rekindled scrutiny at the overall system of federal document classification and retention, which appears to be in serious need of reform. Their two examples stand in stark contrast to Trump’s behavior, and possible misconduct, regarding his own handling of government records.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ }}