The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Tokyo (Japan) (AFP) – The United States will not take Iran at its word over pledges of openness on a believed nuclear weapons program, Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday, after Israel threatened to act against Tehran.

The top U.S. diplomat said the new mood of co-operation that was on display around the United Nations General Assembly in New York had to be backed up by quantifiable deeds.

“I assure (Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu and the people of Israel that nothing that we do is going to be based on trust,” Kerry told reporters in Tokyo.

“This is going to be based on a series of steps to guarantee to all of us that we have certainty on what’s happening.”

Kerry, in Tokyo for talks on the U.S.-Japan security alliance, was speaking after Netanyahu told a U.N. summit Israel was ready to go it alone to stop Iran from making a atomic bomb.

“Israel will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. If Israel is forced to stand alone, Israel will stand alone,” he said after days of overtures by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, which included a number of US television interviews.

Western negotiators are to hold new talks with Iranian representatives in Geneva this month in a first test of the overtures.

International sanctions over what the West says is a nuclear weapons programme have badly hit Iran’s economy and its leaders have made it clear they are looking for relief.

Kerry on Thursday moved to reassure Israel, saying no-one in the U.S. administration would be won over solely by the change in tone since Iran’s new leader came to power, a period that has been marked by a huge upswing in diplomacy from the pariah state.

“We’re going to look very, very carefully at this. We hope it could work because we think the world will be better off, the Middle East will be better off, Iran will be better off, Israel will be better off, if there is a way to achieve a verified, certainty to the elimination of a nuclear program for weapons purposes in Iran,” Kerry said.

“Reaching out”

“The test we face now over these next weeks and months, not a long period of time, over a short period of time, is to determine whether or not that is in fact what Iran intends.”

Kerry praised Rouhani for “reaching out” and said there were voices in the Iranian administration who wanted to go down “different roads”, but he said U.S. President Barack Obama was clear that he wanted results, and not just rhetoric.

“The president has said, and I have said, that it’s not words that will make a difference, it’s actions.

“The actions clearly are going to have to be sufficient that the world will understand that not only will they not be able to be on the road to get a weapon but there’s no ability to suddenly break up that,” he said.

Last year Netanyahu used a cartoon drawing of a bomb to illustrate his warning at the U.N. that Iran was close to being able to build a deployable nuclear weapon.

There were no similar theatrics this time, but Iran hit back, warning Netanyahu that military action against it would be a “miscalculation”.

After a cabinet meeting in Tehran on Wednesday, Rouhani, who took office in June on a pledge to repair strained relations with the international community, dismissed Netanyahu’s comments as bluster.

“We don’t expect anything else from the Zionist regime,” Rouhani told reporters.

Israel is “upset and angry because it sees that its blunted sword is being replaced with logic as the governing force in the world, and because the Iranian nation’s message of peace is being heard better,” the moderate cleric said.

Rouhani’s U.N. charm offensive culminated in a landmark 15-minute phone call with Obama, the first president-to-president contact between the two countries in more than three decades.

Photo Credit: AFP/Issei Kato


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less


YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}