The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Katie Walsh, Tribune News Service (TNS)

Chances are, you’re already familiar with Malala Yousafszai, the young activist and Nobel laureate who survived being shot in the head by the Taliban in Pakistan. But with Davis Guggenheim’s new documentary, He Named Me Malala, based on her memoir, I Am Malala, you’ll get to know the remarkable girl in a much more intimate and illuminating light. While the film itself is plagued with structural storytelling issues that are at best emotionally numbing, at worst confounding, Malala’s inspirational spirit is undeniable, and the documentary allows that to shine through.

Guggenheim’s film weaves three different timelines together to tell the story not only of Malala but of her family, and most significantly, her father Ziauddin, who has informed her worldview. There’s the present day, which features warm scenes of Malala interacting with her family, going to school in England, and attending to her new responsibilities as a global education activist. The second timeline focuses on the attack itself, and the conditions and actions that led up to it, but tells it in reverse.

The third timeline is animated in a soft pastel sketch style, and explains how Malala got her name. The Afghani fable of a young woman who raised her voice to inspire her people is Malala’s namesake. Given to her by her father, a passionate educator who taught Malala to be independent and outspoken, Guggenheim wonders if the name predicted her fate, or if Malala chose her own path.

Eventually we learn that Malala, as a young teen, made the choice to become a loud critic of the Taliban’s practices in her hometown of the Swat Valley in Pakistan, as they were bombing schools daily and preaching that women had no need for education. Coming late in the film, young Malala’s fervent, strident public speaking is awe-inspiring, particularly since we are well aware of the dangers that would befall her.

In this sense the intertwined reverse storytelling works. We come to have affection for her and understand her as a regular teenage girl, while having the groundwork for the situation laid out for us, so that when we see her speaking out for girls’ education, we understand the importance and consequences. However, there are some very jarring switches between the storylines, going from Taliban bombings to lighthearted moments of Malala talking about school, teasing her brothers, or giggling about her favorite cricketers.

This head-snapping timeline shifting makes it so that your emotions are constantly yanked around, and cuts off important moments that could use more time to breathe. However, Malala is such a charming and inspiring presence, and the film takes the time to make sure we see her not just as invincible, but as vulnerable, goofy, and sweet.

When we see her in this light, we know that she’s not someone extraordinary, she’s just an ordinary girl who believed so much in standing up for the right thing that she couldn’t help but do it. This realization is empowering, demonstrating that any person can stand up and do what’s right when they have the courage of their convictions. But, too few actually do what she did, and that’s what makes her so special.



3 stars out of 4

Rated PG-13 for thematic elements involving disturbing images and threats.

Running time: 1 hour, 27 minutes

Cast: Malala Yousafszai, Ziauddin Yousafszai

Directed by Davis Guggenheim


Photo: Malala Yousafzai at the Kisaruni Girls School on May 26, 2014 in Massai Mara, Kenya. (Fox Searchlight Pictures)


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Chief Justice John Roberts

The House Select Committee hearings are swaying political independents and centrists to reject the power-grabbing tactics used by Donald Trump and his Republican enablers to overturn the 2020 presidential election, according to several polls and surveys of battleground state voters released on Thursday, June 30.

“Vast majorities of the American people are paying attention, and they are deeply concerned,” said Leslie Dach, co-chair of Defend Democracy Project, an advocacy group dedicated to the principle that voters determine the outcome of elections. “They believe that a crime has been committed. They want accountability in the courts and at the ballot box. And they hold not just President Trump responsible, but they hold his allies and Republicans responsible for what happened.”

Keep reading... Show less

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

{{ }}