The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Beijing (AFP) – A New York Times reporter left Beijing Thursday after authorities did not grant him a visa, in a case that comes as Chinese authorities ratchet up pressure on foreign media.

Austin Ramzy, who has been based in China for more than six years, departed Beijing for Taipei, where he will be based.

“China is forcing out Austin Ramzy today after 6.5 years,” Times China correspondent Ed Wong wrote on Twitter.

“And we’re off. Next stop, Taipei,” Ramzy tweeted. In an earlier message, he wrote: “Sad to be leaving Beijing. Hope I can return soon.”

His departure comes a month after U.S. Vice President Joe Biden raised the issue of China’s treatment of foreign journalists privately with Chinese leaders during a visit to Beijing.

Beijing has blocked the websites of both the Times and Bloomberg News after they published investigations in 2012 into the family wealth of former premier Wen Jiabao and President Xi Jinping, respectively.

Authorities also reportedly conducted unannounced “inspections” of Bloomberg’s bureaux in Beijing and Shanghai last month and demanded an apology from its editor-in-chief amid a controversy over an unpublished article on the government ties of a Chinese billionaire.

China’s foreign ministry this week said that Ramzy’s journalist visa, which the newspaper applied for in June after he joined from Time magazine, would not be ready before the end of the month, effectively obliging him to leave.

The Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China (FCCC) said it “strongly regrets” that Ramzy “has been forced to leave” and criticized China’s behavior, saying it “falls well short of international standards”.

He is the third New York Times journalist to not be authorized to stay in China in 18 months, it pointed out in a statement.

“In these circumstances it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the authorities are punishing the New York Times for articles it published concerning Premier Wen Jiabao and his family.”

Chris Buckley, a veteran Reuters China correspondent hired by the Times, similarly had to leave Beijing when his previous visa expired in December 2012.

Philip Pan, the Times’s designated Beijing bureau chief, has been waiting for nearly two years for Chinese authorities to grant him a visa and covers the country from Hong Kong.

Asked about China’s treatment of foreign journalists, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying denied any expulsions.

“There’s no such thing as foreign journalists being expelled from China,” Hua said Wednesday at a regular news briefing, adding: “It is Chinese domestic affairs. We are firmly opposed to any individual or any government or organization interfering in China’s domestic affairs.”

Chinese authorities have also said that Ramzy breached visa rules by not changing his status after leaving Time, but the FCCC disputed the accusation.

Foreign journalists covering the trial of activist Xu Zhiyong in Beijing last week were harassed and manhandled by uniformed and plainclothes police.

AFP Photo/Emmanuel Dunand

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

U.S. SUPREME COURT

YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}