The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Earlier this week, I was in Jamestown, N.Y., to give a talk to a library room full of the kindest and feistiest people you ever would want to meet.

For a half-hour or so, I told stories that had virtually nothing to do with Ohio. Then we opened the floor, and the very first question had everything to do with my home state:

What’s going to happen with Issue 2?

If you’re a voter in Ohio, you already know a lot about this ballot issue.

If you don’t live in Ohio, you still should know about it. The fate of Ohio’s Issue 2 could determine the future of your state, too.

Issue 2 is a referendum on SB 5, which the Republican-controlled Ohio Legislature passed earlier this year to limit the collective bargaining rights of 350,000 public employees, including police officers, firefighters, teachers and state workers.

This law makes it impossible for public employees to negotiate their health coverage. Other workplace issues — such as starting and quitting times and work conditions — can be negotiated only if management agrees to discuss them. Strikes are prohibited, and disputes are resolved not by an independent arbitrator, but by the relevant legislative body. If legislators can’t decide, the employer wins.

A popular anti-SB 5 campaign button sums up its impact pretty well: United We Stand, Divided We Beg.

Politicians across the country are waiting to see what happens after the votes are counted in Ohio next month. Sorry to show off, but you know the mantra: As Ohio goes, so goes the nation.

If Ohio voters defeat Issue 2, they will send a message that the swing state has pushed away from the circus currently passing for our Legislature. A defeat also would dampen the enthusiasm of other Republican state legislators just itchin’ to see whether they, too, can get away with pummeling the rights of public employees and breaking their unions.

Lots at stake, which is why former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee brought his lounge act to Ohio last week, advising a crowd of 350 people on how to persuade friends and family to support Issue 2.

“Make a list,” the Republican told them. “Call them and ask them, ‘Are you going to vote for Issue 2?’ If they say no, well, you just make sure that they don’t go vote. Let the air out of their tires on Election Day. Tell them the election has been moved to a different date. That’s up to you how you creatively get the job done.”

Oh, ho-ho-ho, that Huckabee. He’d be funny if he were funny.

Most Ohioans aren’t in the mood for jokes about voter suppression, especially because another recent bit of Republican legislation — also destined for a ballot referendum — was designed to thwart voter participation. This law narrows the time frame for casting absentee ballots. It also absolves poll workers of the duty to warn voters who are about to cast ballots in the wrong precincts.

You might ask: Why? Why would a state not want to do everything possible to make sure its voters cast ballots that count?

There you go, being all logical and fair about democracy in America. You would so not fit in with the Statehouse’s Republican majority here in Ohio.

Every poll so far shows that the majority of Ohio voters are determined to defeat Issue 2. Turns out, public employees — and the people who love them — don’t like being played for chumps.

Firefighters, in particular, have gotten really prickly. A few even are starring in television ads, which brings us to a recent attempt to play dirty with a great-grandmother in southern Ohio.

Earlier this month, 78-year-old Marlene Quinn appeared in a TV ad to describe how firefighters had saved the life of her precious great-granddaughter Zoey during a house fire. Quinn is one grateful granny. She looked straight at the camera and said, “I’m voting no on Issue 2.”

A few days later, Quinn was starring in a second TV ad — for the wrong side. Issue 2 supporters had used a clip of her from the previous ad and misrepresented her as supporting the ballot issue.

What on God’s green earth were they thinking? In addition to believing grandmothers are stupid, I mean.

Boy, did Quinn let them have it. Dozens of TV stations pulled the ad. Now Zoey’s great-grandmother is in another ad, and she’s getting attention all across the country.

And this Ohio grandmother couldn’t be prouder.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including “…and His Lovely Wife,” which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz ( and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Marchers at January 22 anti-vaccination demonstration in Washington, D.C>

Back when it was first gaining traction in the 1990s, the anti-vaccination movement was largely considered a far-left thing, attracting believers ranging from barter-fair hippies to New Age gurus and their followers to “holistic medicine” practitioners. And it largely remained that way … until 2020 and the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As this Sunday’s “Defeat the Mandates” march in Washington, D.C., however, showed us, there’s no longer anything even remotely left-wing about the movement. Populated with Proud Boys and “Patriot” militiamen, QAnoners and other Alex Jones-style conspiracists who blithely indulge in Holocaust relativism and other barely disguised antisemitism, and ex-hippies who now spout right-wing propaganda—many of them, including speakers, encouraging and threatening violence—the crowd at the National Mall manifested the reality that “anti-vaxxers” now constitute a full-fledged far-right movement, and a potentially violent one at that.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}