The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Pakistan Might Have Sold Nuclear Tech to North Korea

WASHINGTON (AP) — The founder of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program claims that in the late 1990s North Korean officials paid kickbacks to senior Pakistani military figures in exchange for critical weapons technology.

Abdul Qadeer Khan has given a United States-based expert documents that appear to show North Korea’s government paid more than $3.5 million to two Pakistani military officials as part of the deal, the expert told The Associated Press Wednesday.

To back up his claim, Khan released what he said was a copy of a North Korean official’s 1998 letter to him, written in English, that purports to describe the secret deal.

Khan gave the documents to Simon Henderson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, an authority on Pakistan’s weapons program. He did so because he has been accused by his government of running a covert nuclear smuggling operation without official knowledge or consent.

“He gave it to me because he regarded it as showing that the story, the perception that he had been a rogue operator was false,” Henderson said.

The letter, along with a statement by Khan describing the deal, suggests that at least some top-level Pakistani military officials knew early on about some of Khan’s extensive sale of nuclear weapons technology to other countries, including North Korea, Iran and Libya.

If that’s true, it could deepen the distrust between the United States and Pakistan, which are struggling to set aside their differences and cooperate in the battle against militant extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua said Thursday of the report, “It is totally baseless.”

The significance of the revelation is in dispute. Henderson said the documents prove Khan’s claims that his nuclear arms smuggling network had high-level support from the Pakistani government, but others say the letter bolsters the government’s claims it didn’t know what Khan was up to.

The Washington Post said it obtained the documents and first reported on them on its website Wednesday after a lengthy effort to authenticate them.

The letter Khan released is dated July 15, 1998, and marked “Secret.” It carries the apparent signature of North Korean Workers Party Secretary Jon Byong Ho.

The text says, “Please give the agreed documents, components, etc. to a … (North Korean Embassy official in Pakistan) to be flown back when our plane returns after delivery of missile components.”

The letter never mentions the word “nuclear.” But Khan’s written description of the events surrounding the letter makes it clear that the Workers Party official was referring to components and plans for Pakistani centrifuges used to enrich uranium.

Highly enriched uranium can be used either to make fuel for nuclear reactors or to form the explosive core of a nuclear weapon.

Jehangir Karamat, a former Pakistani military chief named as the recipient of the $3 million, said the letter was untrue. In an email to the Post from Lahore, Karamat said Khan, as part of his defense against allegations of personal responsibility for illicit nuclear proliferation, had tried “to shift blame on others.”

The other official, retired Lt. Gen. Zulfiqar Khan, called the letter “a fabrication.”

The Post said the assertions by Khan and the details in the letter could not be independently verified.

But the newspaper quoted one senior U.S. official who said the signature appeared genuine and the contents were “consistent with our knowledge” of the events described. Another intelligence official said the letter contained information known only to a handful of people.

Khan has long denied claims that he was working behind his government’s back in his covert nuclear technology sales to foreign governments.

“This is a piece of dramatic evidence that Khan did not act as a single rogue agent, but instead was operating at the instruction of others,” Henderson said. “I think the main point of this is that Pakistan used this technology to trade for diplomatic advantage.”

David Albright, an authority on nuclear proliferation with the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, disagreed, saying the letter and Khan’s narrative are evidence he acted alone.

“It shows that Khan was a rogue agent and that he colluded to provide centrifuge components to North Korea without Pakistani official approval,” Albright said.

He said that in Khan’s narrative, which has not been released, the scientist claimed he had assured the military that North Korea would not use the centrifuges for its nuclear weapons program, since it already had more advanced technology for that purpose.

Albright said the claim was false, but Pakistani military officials could have found it plausible.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Youtube Screenshot

In late 2011, John Oliver and his Daily Show cameraman made a trek to my office, then in Providence, Rhode Island, to take me to task. I had recently referred to the Tea Partiers who had pushed America to the brink of a disastrous default as "economic terrorists."

Oliver had apparently swallowed whole a series of barbs directed my way by a Wall Street Journal blogger who didn't seem to like women much. The blogger kept calling me the "Civility diva" and a "Baroness Catherine Ashton lookalike." (A member of the British parliament, Ashton was said to be homely.) He was quite the wit.

Keep reading...Show less

Donald Trump and Mike Pence

Youtube Screenshot

Several mainstream media outlets are manufacturing a political narrative that the discovery of classified documents at the homes of both President Joe Biden and former Vice President Mike Pence should alleviate pressure on disgraced former President Donald Trump, who not only took a vast trove of federal records but also refused to give them back.

Biden and Pence have both cooperated with federal investigators to recover and return documents that belong to the government, and both situations have rekindled scrutiny at the overall system of federal document classification and retention, which appears to be in serious need of reform. Their two examples stand in stark contrast to Trump’s behavior, and possible misconduct, regarding his own handling of government records.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ }}