The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

There is no question in the minds of health care experts where Trump comes down on the issue of pre-existing conditions: He does “exactly the opposite” of protecting them.

In an analysis published Thursday, Politifact gave Trump a “False” rating for this claim from early May: “We will always protect patients with pre-existing conditions, very importantly.”

The analysis relied on interviews with four experts who cited Trump’s desire to strike down the entirety of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as contradicting the his claim.

In March, Trump’s Justice Department asked federal courts to completely eliminate the ACA, part of which protects people with pre-existing conditions from paying higher health care costs or being denied health insurance all-together. The administration reiterated their goal in May, writing that the entire ACA “must be struck down.”

Given Trump’s stance, “there is real cause for skepticism” about Trump’s claim, Wendy Netter Epstein, a DePaul University law professor, told Politifact.

Further, the Trump administration is allowing states to sell junk health insurance plans that are not required to protect people with pre-existing conditions, something Democrats are trying to stop.

In the end, the “White House’s policy trajectory does exactly the opposite” of protecting people with pre-existing conditions, concludes Politifact.

“The DOJ’s stance, which reflects a policy in place at the same moment the president made this claim, would eliminate the only law guaranteeing that people with pre-existing conditions both receive health coverage and do not have to pay more for it.” Further, “the administration has not put forth any plan that might keep those guarantees in place.”

The analysis goes on to say that Trump’s team has “taken further steps that could make it harder for people with pre-existing conditions to get affordable coverage.”

Rather than being honest about what he is fighting for, Trump’s statement “is not accurate and makes a claim in direct opposition of what’s actually happening.”

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni Thomas, center

A bombshell exposé by an award-winning investigative journalist takes a deep look into lobbyist and far right wing activist and conspiracy theorist Ginni Thomas, and the ties she has to people, groups – and money – that have or may have business before the U.S. Supreme Court, on which her conservative husband sits.

Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer asks point-blank. “Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.”

Keep reading... Show less

Judge Alexis G. Krot

Judge Alexis G. Krot shouted at Burhan Chowdhury, a 72 year old cancer patient whom local police cited for not maintaining his yard. “If I could give you jail time on this I would,” the Michigan jurist warned Chowdhury.

A cancer diagnosis doesn’t buy much more leniency in other courtrooms. In 2020, a judge in Pennsylvania sentenced Ashley Menser, a 36 year old in need of a hysterectomy for ovarian and cervical cancer, to a 10 month term.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}