The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

According to a recent Suffolk University poll, Republican Senator Scott Brown is now in a virtual tie with his Democratic challenger, Elizabeth Warren.

Brown leads Warren 48 percent to 47 percent, well within the poll’s margin of error. Brown’s lead is significantly down from Suffolk University’s February poll, in which he led Warren by 9 percentage points.

The poll contains more good news for Warren: 49 percent of voters see her as representing the interests of middle-class families, compared to just 36 percent who said the same of Brown. Furthermore, while 72 percent of likely voters were aware of the controversy surrounding Warren’s Native American heritage, 49 percent of those voters believe her side of the story (compared to just 28 percent who don’t,) and 69 percent of voters said that story was not significant.

Warren may also be helped by a strong performance from President Obama, who leads Mitt Romney by 25 points in the former Massachusetts governor’s home state.

On the flip side, Warren’s attempt to paint Brown as a tool of Wall Street has been ineffective. 55 percent of voters disagreed with the statement that a vote for Brown is a vote for Wall Street, compared to 33 percent who agreed.

As Suffolk University Political Research Center director David Paleologos said in a statement, the race is expected to be close and costly to the end.

“In both the February and May polls, Brown has fallen short of the coveted 50 percent mark for an incumbent, while Elizabeth Warren has converted some undecided voters since February,” he said. “This leaves both campaigns no choice but to spend tens of millions of dollars in an all-out war to woo the five percent of voters who will decide this election.”


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

David Perdue
David Perdue

With most conservative candidates in primary races across the country pledging allegiance to former President Trump and disseminating his Big Lie, what is a Republican candidate to do to get ahead? Why, just accuse their Republican opponent of having ties to China, of course!

Spurious, misleading, and even exaggerated accusations of connections with China are a source of anxiety for Republicans in the 2022 races, while campaign strategists and candidates have labeled such allegations a “prime attack in a Republican primary,” according to the Washington Post.

Keep reading... Show less

John Eastman

Former Trump attorney John Eastman used his University of Colorado email account to collude with a Republican lawmaker in Pennsylvania to formulate a pretext to seat Trump electors in a state Joe Biden won by nearly 82,000 votes. It was a last ditch-bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election, new emails obtained by the House Select Committee show.

Eastman devised a sinister idea to label tens of thousands of absentee ballots illegitimate, thus giving then-President Trump the state’s popular vote lead. This method, Eastman proposed, “would help provide some cover,” beneath which Republicans could swap Biden’s electors with sham electors for Trump who would subvert the 2020 elections.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}