Type to search

Pure Lunacy To Jail This Man For 20 Years

Memo Pad Top News

Pure Lunacy To Jail This Man For 20 Years

Share

The travesty imprisonment of Orville “Lee” Wollard will continue, with the blessing of Florida Gov. Rick Scott. Last week, Scott cast the decisive vote to keep Wollard locked up for firing a warning shot after being attacked in his home by his daughter’s boyfriend. Police said the boyfriend ripped the surgical stitches from Wollard’s abdomen.

The 60-year-old first-time offender has already served about seven years of a mandatory 20-year term. A Polk County jury had convicted him of shooting into a dwelling and aggravated assault with a firearm.

A charge of child abuse was included because the boyfriend of Wollard’s daughter was 17 at the time of the incident, in 2008.

Curiously, the same prosecutor who’d originally offered Wollard a deal of five years’ probation (with no prison time) told the state clemency board on Wednesday that Wollard should stay behind bars after all this time.

State Attorney Jerry Hill offered no good explanation for his 180-degree pivot, nor did Scott bother to ask how Wollard could suddenly be a menace to society when he was deemed suitable for probation before his trial.

Hill asked clemency officials to keep Wollard in prison because he has “a history of bad decisions” that includes drug use. A Department of Corrections official told Times/Herald reporter Steve Bousquet that Wollard has a perfect disciplinary record at the Apalachee Correctional Institution, where he’s an inmate.

Wollard, who has a master’s degree, was a former human-resources specialist at SeaWorld in Orlando. His case has become part of a national (and bipartisan) movement to reform minimum-mandatory sentencing guidelines and give judges more leeway.

Those rigid laws have worsened prison overcrowding, at enormous cost to taxpayers. In Washington, a coalition of Democratic and Republican senators has announced a plan to cut mandatory prison terms for nonviolent offenders in the federal system.

Donald Jacobsen, the Florida circuit judge who handed the 20-year hitch to Wollard, conceded at the time that, “If it wasn’t for the minimum-mandatory aspect of this, I would use my discretion and impose some separate sentence, having taken into consideration the circumstances of the event.”

Jacobsen had no choice then but to follow the law.

Lee Wollard stood “stunned.”

He’d rejected the prosecutor’s offer of probation because he didn’t want a criminal record, and believed he’d done nothing wrong. He gambled on a trial, and lost big-time.

Ironically, state legislators last year cited Wollard’s case among others when they rewrote and expanded the controversial “stand your ground” statutes. No longer can a person be arrested for firing a warning shot if he or she feels threatened by use of force. Unfortunately for Wollard, that major change in the law wasn’t retroactive.

Scott, who signed the reform legislation, had a chance to do the right thing and stand up for Wollard. Instead, he sided with the staff of the clemency board and Wollard’s two-faced prosecutor, Hill.

Hill showed to Scott and other Cabinet members on the panel an enlarged photograph of the bullet hole inside Wollard’s house. He argued that the altercation was almost over when Wollard shot off the revolver close to his daughter’s boyfriend.

“There was no reason to fire that shot,” Hill said.

Worst-case scenario: Wollard made a reckless decision trying to scare off a teenager who’d just clawed Wollard’s stitches.

And for that — shooting a slug into a wall — a man who’s never been convicted of any other crime should rot in a cell for 20 years? It’s pure lunacy, and an abominable perversion of the justice system.

There are armed robbers, rapists, even killers who will do less prison time than Lee Wollard.

If the clemency board is hiding some deep, dark information about him, all of it should be made public. But if the panel was swayed by the melodramatic stagecraft of the prosecutor, Wollard ought to be freed.

Rep. Neil Combee, a Polk City Republican, is introducing a bill to change minimum-mandatory sentences in cases like Wollard’s. Combee, who also sponsored last year’s reform bill, cannot fathom how a person who’d been offered probation is now — after seven passive years of incarceration — deserving of 13 more.

Said Combee: “It doesn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense to me, or anybody else.”

Including Wollard’s wife, Sandy, who was in tears when she left the Capitol. “I’m shocked,” she told reporters.

Her husband isn’t eligible for release until July 13, 2028, the same month as his 73rd birthday.

Maybe then they’ll put a real criminal in that cell.

(Carl Hiaasen is a columnist for The Miami Herald. Readers may write to him at: 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132.)

Photo: Ben (via Flickr)

Tags:
Carl Hiaasen

Carl Hiaasen is an award-winning journalist, commentator, and novelist. Hiaasen has worked for the Miami Herald since 1976, and his writing focuses on environmental and corruption issues in his home state of Florida.

His latest book is Skink—No Surrender (2014).

  • 1

13 Comments

  1. janis mcdonald October 6, 2015

    How sad for us all — prisons are a business, a very big, lucrative business.

    Reply
  2. johninPCFL October 6, 2015

    Thanks, Gov Scott. The prosecutor has nothing on you when it comes to being two-faced.

    Reply
  3. larm007 October 6, 2015

    Vote Scott out. And get a petition started to free this man. What a travesty.

    Reply
    1. midway54 October 6, 2015

      The hairless cipher in the governor’s chair was just returned to office in the last cycle thanks to the votes of the plentiful supply of vulnerable rednecks, low information dupes and crackpots in Florida, who were responsible for sending Rubio to the Senate.

      1. Magnus Thunderson October 6, 2015

        I call them floridoits and just as bad as Texidoits who had bush as a Gov who tanked the economy of Texas under his watch and by a vast margin vote for him for the presidency were he tanked the country’s economy as he drank him in a stupor according to his wife and ran the country on auto pilot but not if his brother is not worse as his problem is do it my way or go to hell even with his on party

      2. larm007 October 8, 2015

        I know.
        And it’s very, very sad. We won’t have government for, of, or by the people is the people are clueless about what is going on. “Rednecks, dupes and crackpots” are not just a Florida problem.

  4. Ray Evans Harrell October 6, 2015

    A good reason not to go to Florida for a vacation. Sounds like a screwed up place to me no matter how beautiful the ocean.

    Reply
  5. Magnus Thunderson October 6, 2015

    That is not aggravated assault that’s self defense as he as I hi home and the boyfriend attached him.

    Reply
  6. Magnus Thunderson October 6, 2015

    That is not aggravated assault that’s self defense as he as h was in his home and the boyfriend attached him first and firing a warring shot is not an attack at all

    Reply
  7. RED October 6, 2015

    Ahh, the Land of the Free, where justice is anything but free. I’m kidding of course! There is no such thing as justice in an American Criminal Court Room. There are those who can buy their way out, a la Rush Limbaugh, and there are those who recognize these the poor have no chance and accept the completely Un-Consititutional and disgusting “plea bargain,” better known as the “if you make us actually do our job and get evidence to send you to prison then we will increase the penalty ten fold.” In the U.S., every one is entitled to a defense and if you’re poor that defense works for the exact same people trying to send you to prison. And they both wanna go to lunch early and get a game of golf in, so they’re not able to let the destruction of your life and years in a violent prison mess up their lunch or an early Friday golf game, seriously the poor are so selfish.

    Reply
  8. Arie October 6, 2015

    The 8th amendment to the US constitution: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”
    This is pretty obviously “cruel or unusable punishment”, but poiticians lately really don’t give a damn about this amendment, and neither does the Supreme Court.

    Reply
  9. Daniel Jones October 6, 2015

    Lee Wollard is in jail and will die in jail because the state knows he’ll nail them to a rock for this stupidity if he ever leaves jail.

    Reply
  10. silas1898 October 6, 2015

    I understand Mr. Wollard not wanting a criminal record, but his lawyer should have made it clear to him that he would lose at trial because of the way the law was written and the plea-bargain was the best option.

    Juries will usually follow the law no matter how ridiculous it is.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.