The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

In a recent feature in the New York Times Magazine, Robert Draper described Senator Rand Paul’s (R-KY) vision for the GOP as “libertarian — though only up to a point.”

Thanks to an interview that Senator Paul did with the American Liberty Association this week, we have a better idea of what that point is.

In the interview, Paul reiterated his strong support for fetal personhood bills — and suggested that failing to pass them could bring about the end of civilization.

“I’ve introduced legislation called the Life at Conception Act, to define when life begins: at conception. I’ve also probably co-sponsored 20-some-odd pro-life bills, I have a 100 percent voting record for pro-life,” Paul said during the interview. “But I also have taken the time to go to the March for Life. When I was there, I was the only senator who showed up for the March for Life.”

“So I do think it’s important,” Paul added. “I often say in my speeches, that I don’t think a civilization can long endure that doesn’t respect the rights of the unborn.”

So the government should stay out of people’s lives…unless there’s a fertilized embryo involved, in which case the constitutionally protected right to privacy will cause the Apocalypse.

Paul’s Life at Conception Act would extend legal rights to humans “at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual member of the human species comes into being.” In practice, the bill would outlaw abortion, in addition to embryonic stem cell research and many common forms of birth control.

In the past, the senator has made no secret of his support for such measures. That appears to be changing as he prepares for a widely anticipated presidential run; in April, Paul upset some conservatives by saying that “we are not changing any [abortion] laws until the country is persuaded otherwise,” and earlier this week he told an Iowa crowd that “I think almost nobody in here wants to ban birth control.”

Abortion is just one of many issues on which Paul has flipped back and forth. Earlier this month, PolitiFact rated Paul’s claim that he’s never proposed phasing out aid to Israel as “Pants on Fire.” He has also falsely claimed that he has never opposed the Civil Rights Act, and gone from calling for an electrified underground border fence to supporting legal status for undocumented immigrants, among many other position changes.

H/t: The Raw Story

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Want more political news and analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons and one novel. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Jason Miller

Screenshot from C-SPAN

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

If there's anything that right-wing chat platforms promising uncensored "free speech" like Gab and Parler have proven, it's that such predicates ensure the platforms will quickly be inundated with the worst people in the world—bigots spewing death threats, hatemongers, disinformation artists, conspiracy theorists, vile misogynists, and terrorists of all stripes. The kind of clients that will doom such networks to permanent deplatforming.

Keep reading... Show less
x

Close