The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Among the charges leveled most frequently during Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential bid was that, having been a U.S. senator just two years and a state lawmaker and law professor before that, he lacked the executive experience and management skills to lead the most powerful country on Earth. Ron Suskind, the controversial author whose insider accounts of past administrations have drawn bipartisan criticism, seems to jump on that bandwagon, albeit with caveats, in his new book, “Confidence Men.”

“He was a brilliant amateur,” Suskind said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Tuesday. “He comes into the most toxic crisis environment you could manage with no managerial experience and he has around him seasoned long-term Washington mandarins.”

Suskind says Obama struggled to steer the bureaucracy to adhere to his wishes and that his subordinates, including Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, intentionally dithered in carrying out some of his policies.

“[Treasury Secretary Timothy] Geithner clearly slow-walked as the president, meaning that he did not move as the president hoped he would, some would say he ignored the president,” Suskind said, citing an interview where the president admitted that “the bureaucracy didn’t do what I wanted it to do.”

Suskind is referring to a March 2009 directive where the president ordered Geithner to consider dissolving Citigroup, the bailed-out bank of which the Federal government had taken a majority stake.

“The Citbank incident, and others like it, reflected a more pernicious and personal dilemma emerging from inside the administration: that the young president’s authority was being systematically undermined or hedged by his seasoned advisers,” Suskind wrote.

Geithner, for his part, disputed this account on Monday.

“I would never do that. I have spent my life in public service. It’s my great privilege to serve this president, and I would never contemplate doing that,” he said, adding he had not read the book. “But, again, I lived the original, and the reality I lived, we all lived together, bears no relation to the sad little stories I heard reported from that book.”

The treasury secretary is not the only one to hint that Suskind’s credibility may be less-than-pristine. Republican strategist and former Bush White House official Karl Rove, who would seem to have no incentive to defend the president from an unflattering account, nonetheless said on Fox News earlier this week that “I’m not certain how much of this book is true and accurate. My personal experience with him [Suskind] is that he tends to exaggerate.”

The author stands firm by his book, calling his reporting “solid as a brick.”

“Everyone was confronted with the key evidence that’s in the book prior to publication. I went to every one of the major characters, including Tim Geithner. They respond in the pages of the book,” he said. “When you get to the political environment, the White House says, ‘Just say you were on Venus that day, temporarily insane.'”

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

U.S. SUPREME COURT

YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}