The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

 

Sarah Huckabee Sanders ramped up the Trump administration’s war on the free press this weekend by declaring that it was “bad behavior” for a reporter to ask questions at a press conference and that the reporter’s employer would be punished as a result.

On Sunday morning’s edition of CNN’s “State of the Union,” host Jake Tapper announced that the White House had canceled National Security Advisor John Bolton’s interview because of what Sanders called “bad behavior” from Jim Acosta, CNN’s chief White House correspondent.

Sanders tweeted Saturday that Acosta had “disrespected” Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May with “bad behavior” during their joint press conference on Friday — by simply asking a question.

Tapper then played a clip of the alleged “bad behavior,” which in reality was nothing more than basic, responsible journalism.

As Tapper noted, Acosta waited nine full minutes after Trump attacked CNN as “dishonest” before reacting by trying to ask a question.

“Mr. President, since you attacked CNN, can I ask you a question?” Acosta said. “If you continue to attack us, we should be able to ask a question.”

“I don’t take questions from CNN, CNN is fake news. I don’t take questions from CNN,” Trump answered. “John Roberts of Fox. Let’s go to a real network.”

“Well, we’re a real network, too, sir,” Acosta replied.

This incident recalls another in which Trump’s campaign manager demanded that Acosta be disciplined for the “offense” of asking questions during a White House event.

Trump has threatened to take away journalists’ credentials for reporting unfavorably on him. Both he and Sanders demanded the firing of journalist Jemele Hill for exercising free speech.

Sanders’ explicit attempt to control the free press by punishing a reporter for asking questions is a chilling violation of democratic freedoms and American values.

Published with permission of The American Independent. 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

U.S. SUPREME COURT

YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}