The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Arizona Sen. Martha McSally on Thursday lashed out at a CNN reporter after being asked if she would consider new evidence in Donald Trump’s upcoming impeachment trial.

“You’re a liberal hack,” McSally said to reporter Manu Raju, before hurrying away into a Senate hearing room.

During an interview on MSNBC Wednesday night, Lev Parnas, a close associate of Rudy Giuliani who was indicted last year for his part in an illegal campaign finance scheme, accused Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General Bill Barr, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), and several other people close to Trump of being involved in a pressure campaign to push Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

Prior to his interview, Parnas handed over troves of new evidence to the House Intelligence Committee, including a handwritten note mentioning the need to ask Ukraine’s president to investigate “the Biden case.”

In December, the House of Representatives impeached Trump for both abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. A Senate trial is set to begin next week, but senators, who will act as jurors, are still debating whether or not to hear from witnesses or look at evidence that has emerged in the weeks since the impeachment vote.

McSally’s outburst on Thursday was met with criticism, with the organization VoteVets tweeting that the Raju’s question was “completely reasonable.”

McSally later defended her comments by reiterating her previous claims. “A) you are,” she tweeted, referring to her earlier comment calling the reporter a “liberal hack” and posting a video of the interaction. “B) here’s the video.”

A spokesperson for CNN issued a statement about the interaction Thursday afternoon, saying it was “extremely unbecoming for a U.S. Senator to sink to this level and treat a member of the press this way for simply doing his job.”

“It’s clear that Martha McSally has no interest in hearing the facts, uncovering the truth, and being an independent representative for Arizonans,” Brad Bainum, spokesperson for the Arizona Democratic Party, said in an email the same day. “It’s unfortunate that [her] only goal is to protect her party leaders and her personal political future.”

McSally is in a precarious situation, having already been rejected by Arizona voters in 2018. She is running again in 2020 after being appointed to the position by the state’s Republican governor to finish out the term of the late Sen. John McCain.

McSally’s likely Democratic opponent, former astronaut Mark Kelly, has raised significantly more campaign cash than McSally, and has led in every statewide poll since late October 2019.

McSally was recently caught on tape asking dark money groups to air television ads in Arizona to help her struggling campaign, complaining that she did not have the campaign funds to do it herself.

In the past, McSally refused to rule out accepting foreign assistance to help her campaign.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Attorney General Merrick Garland

Photo by The White House

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

The Department of Justice had the kind of pro-police reform week that doesn't happen every year. In a seven-day period, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a ban on chokeholds and no-knock warrants, an overhaul on how to handle law enforcement oversight deals, and a promise to make sure the Justice Department wasn't funding agencies that engage in racial discrimination.

Keep reading... Show less

FBI Director Faces Sharp New Scrutiny Over Kavanaugh Probe

Photo by Federal Bureau of Investigation (Public domain)

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

When then-U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was accused of sexual misconduct by Christine Blasey Ford — a psychology professor at Palo Alto University — in 2018, the FBI conducted an investigation. But Kavanaugh's critics argued that the investigation should have been much more comprehensive in light of the fact that then-President Donald Trump had nominated him for a lifetime appointment on the highest judicial body in the United States. FBI Director Christopher Wray's handling of that investigation, according to Guardian reporter Stephanie Kirchgaessner, continues to be scrutinized three years later.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}