The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

Even as Trump homeland security chief Kirstjen Nielsen tried to pretend Trump’s policy of ripping children from their families at the border doesn’t exist, Attorney General Jeff Sessions was promising that the family separations would end if Trump just got his border wall.

During a speech to the National Sheriffs Association Monday morning, Sessions admitted separating families at the border is a “choice” and said it would end if Trump’s demands are met.

“If we build a wall, we pass some legislation, we close some loopholes, we won’t face these terrible choices,” Sessions said of the policy.

Sessions’ remarks come as the Trump administration’s policy sparks global outcry, and the administration is desperate to avoid its political consequences.

In addition to Nielsen’s blatant lie, first lady Melania Trump and White House counselor Kellyanne Conway were deployed over the weekend to try and co-opt outrage about the policy.

Trump himself has been shamelessly exploiting the crisis in order to extract concessions from the Democrats, and even arguing the policy is somehow necessary to prevent crime.

Trump also claimed that “Children are being used by some of the worst criminals on earth as a means to enter our country.”

Trump is trying to have it both ways, insisting that his own policy isn’t his own policy, while also offering to end that policy in exchange for legislative concessions.

But most Americans can plainly see that Trump’s policy isn’t the necessary evil he and Sessions are selling it as, it’s just evil.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

U.S. SUPREME COURT

YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}