Type to search

‘Small Government’ Republicans Want To Control D.C.’s Budget

Featured Post National News Politics Top News US

‘Small Government’ Republicans Want To Control D.C.’s Budget

Share
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 25, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

The House passed legislation Wednesday afternoon gutting a local ballot measure that would give Washington, D.C. more control over its finances. The vote took place on partisan lines, with Republicans voting for the measure and Democrats voting against it.

“The current D.C. government needs to be reined in,” said House Majority Leader Paul Ryan in a statement highlighting Republican arguments in support of the bill. “We will not allow Congress and the Constitution to be undermined.

“Congress has ultimate authority over the District,” he said, “and efforts to undermine this authority are in violation of the Constitution. There are real consequences.”

Lawmakers had voted 240-179 in favor of a bill that would prevent the District from spending tax dollars without congressional approval. The vote is the latest in a campaign that started in 2012 to give residents of D.C. greater autonomy in how to spend the city’s money, and is part of an effort by Republican congressmen to prevent the District from using local or federal cash to fund abortions or marijuana decriminalization (pot was legalized late last year in D.C.).

While the Republican-controlled Congress says it’s only reining in unconstitutional excesses, D.C.’s non-voting Congressional representative Eleanor Holmes Norton was understandably angered by legislation that nullified the 2012 Budget Autonomy Act, a ballot initiative aimed at giving more power to local government.

“It is profoundly undemocratic for any member of Congress in the 21st century to declare that he has authority over any jurisdiction except his own,” she said during a debate on the House floor.

But House Republicans have argued that the ballot initiative was a clear violation of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, a law passed in 1973 which devolved certain powers, like being able to elect a mayor and city council. But all laws passed by the District’s government had to be reviewed and approved by Congress before being signed into law, including yearly budget plans, hence the Republican bill aimed at overturning the Budget Autonomy Act.

President Obama has said he would veto any legislation that barred D.C. from following through on the overwhelming support the 2012 ballot initiative received from the city’s residents.

“The Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 5233, which would repeal the District of Columbia’s Local Budget Autonomy Amendment Act of 2012,” read a statement of administrative policy sent out yesterday. “The Administration strongly supports home rule for the District and the President has long called for authority allowing the District to spend its own local taxes and other non-Federal funds without congressional approval … If the President were presented with H.R. 5233, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.”

Prior to the vote, city officials had said they were planning to not submit their budget to Congress, as per the stipulations of the Budget Autonomy Act. Should Paul Ryan have his way, D.C. would be forced to submit its budget for approval, possibly at the cost of programs popular with residents of the District, including providing local funding for abortion access for Medicaid-eligible women, and establishing a regulatory framework for legal marijuana sales.

Photo: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 25, 2016.      REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Tags:

11 Comments

  1. Lynda Groom May 26, 2016

    What is mildly amusing is the the republican party is still trying to maintain that carnard of ‘small-government’ while doing everything possible to impose big government into the lives of everyday Americans. Of course the ill informed rubes who blindly follow the party eat up the pablum as if manna from the gods.

    Reply
    1. Daniel Jones May 26, 2016

      Their definition of “small government” is the Republican power brokers deciding EVERYTHING. Small, as in no one else gets any power.

    2. johninPCFL May 27, 2016

      While I agree that the GOP model of “small government” is one composed of at least one police officer for every bedroom, public bathroom, and doctor’s office in the US, constitutionally, Congress controls all activity in DC.

      1. Lynda Groom May 27, 2016

        Indeed they have the purse strings and have done such a marvelous job of control.

  2. Paul Bass May 27, 2016

    Did we really think Paul Ryan would NOT be a weasel a$$hole?

    Reply
  3. kalpal May 27, 2016

    Small government means a government ruled by the Guardians Of Privilege.

    Reply
  4. jmprint May 27, 2016

    Why not rein in the Texas government, why just Washington?

    Reply
    1. johninPCFL May 27, 2016

      Constitutionally, Congress controls all activity in DC. Texas has an independent governmental entity.

  5. I of John May 27, 2016

    what happened to all of the GOP Libertarian stuff they like to throw around. So much for small government huh? Does the RNC believe in anything really?

    Reply
    1. johninPCFL May 27, 2016

      Constitutionally, Congress controls all activity in DC.

  6. Progressive Republican May 28, 2016

    What a splendid display of how much the GOP really believes in the whole ‘self autonomy/small government’ thing.

    Oh yeah; then there’s that ‘taxation without representation’ bit as well.

    Smfh…

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.