Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By John Wisely, Paul Egan and Jennifer Dixon, Detroit Free Press (TNS)

DETROIT—Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder’s staffers worried in September that the issue of lead in Flint’s drinking water was being politicized and that the state’s responsibility for the crisis was being exaggerated.

“I can’t figure out why the state is responsible except that (then-treasurer Andy) Dillon did make the ultimate decision so we’re not able to avoid the subject,” Snyder’s chief of staff Dennis Muchmore wrote to Snyder in a Sept. 25, 2015, e-mail.

He followed it up the next morning, writing: “The real responsibility rests with the county, city and KWA,” referring to the Karegnondi Water Authority. “But since the issue here is the health of citizens and their children, we’re taking a proactive approach.”

Muchmore’s e-mail came after a Hurley Medical Center pediatrician reported finding elevated blood lead levels in Flint children.

Muchmore’s e-mails were included in 274 pages of Snyder’s e-mails released Wednesday in the wake of the water crisis that has led protesters to call for the governor to resign. House Minority Leader Tim Greimel, a Democrat, said he was very disappointed with redactions in the e-mails and the fact Snyder only released what he said were his own e-mails, instead of all Flint-related e-mails to and from officials in the executive office.

The first e-mail in the file released by Snyder is from Michael Gadola, then Snyder’s legal counsel, and includes 21/2 pages of blacked-out text. Most of the other redactions are of e-mail addresses.

“It’s very disappointing to see the governor play these types of games,” Greimel said.

Muchmore, who retired Tuesday as Snyder’s chief of staff, told The Detroit Free Press that when he wrote that Dillon made the ultimate decision, he meant that the Flint emergency manager reported to Dillon and Dillon “signed off on it.”

Muchmore said he was referencing Flint’s decision to join the Karegnondi Water Authority, a new pipeline now under construction to Lake Huron. That decision was supported by the locals and the Flint City Council, which endorsed it with a 7-1 vote.

After the vote, Detroit notified Flint that it was terminating water service to Flint in 12 months, which prompted a scramble for an alternative source. A year later, Flint began drawing and treating water from the Flint River for distribution to the city. The river water immediately drew complaints of discoloration, odor and rust.

Dillon said in an e-mail to the Free Press he was initially reluctant to sign off on Flint moving to the KWA because he didn’t think the change would save the cash-strapped city money. He said he changed his mind after he was told in a briefing with the Department of Environmental Quality that the new pipeline would be a cost-saver, and after determining that the Detroit water system was not prepared to give Flint a better deal.

“However, this was a different decision than the decision to use the Flint River,” Dillon said. “I don’t recall that decision coming to me.”

Muchmore said Wednesday that the Flint River had always been the backup water source and while there was some disagreement about the issue, no one really talked about the significance of using the river water until after it happened and complaints started pouring in.

“Everybody thought professionals will treat this water and they will make it good,” Muchmore said Wednesday. “Andy ultimately signed off on the KWA because he felt it was acceptable financially, No.1 , and the DEQ had signed off on the technical part of it, and more importantly, the local people wanted to do it.”

The e-mails were released after Snyder made a pledge in his State of the State address Tuesday. Normally, the e-mails would not be disclosed publicly, but Snyder agreed to release them after pressure from the Detroit Free Press and others to make his communications public in the wake of the public health emergency.

In the e-mails, Muchmore wrote that U.S. Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., was “engaged in his normal press hound routine” after the congressman issued a press release noting he’d asked the EPA to help the state deal with the crisis. Muchmore added that then-Mayor Dayne Walling “went out on a CYA effort due to the election.”

They also show doubts about returning Flint to the Detroit system and even questioning if the reports of higher lead levels are accurate.

“They can’t reconnect to DWSD even if they wanted to as they sold the connector line,” Muchmore wrote Sept. 26. “And, especially with the new rate increases in Detroit, their citizens would be less able to pay than they already are. Now we have the anti everything group turning to the lead content which is a concern for everyone, but DEQ and DHHS and EPA can’t find evidence of a major change per Geralyn’s memo below.”

Muchmore was referring to a memo from Geralyn Lasher at the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services that said blood lead level data examined by Hurley Medical Center Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha didn’t match the state’s data.

“Hurley used two partial years of data, MDHHS looked at five comprehensive years and saw no increase outside the normal seasonal increases,” Lasher wrote. “The Hurley review was also a much smaller sample than MDHHS data as ours includes all hospital systems in Flint as well as outside laboratories. We have also provided the attached data chart that outlines if the elevated blood lead levels were being driven by a change in water, we would have seen the elevated levels remain high after the change in water source.”

Three days later, Snyder received a daily briefing from staffers laying out the concerns in Flint. The first bullet point in the briefing noted that the most common cause of lead poisoning is from lead paint.

“Blood lead level testing results for the 12-month period just after the City of Flint changed its water source (May 2014- April 2015) showed no significant change in the pattern of blood lead levels in Flint, compared to the previous three years,” Snyder was informed in the briefing. “This data suggests the recent change in water source by the City of Flint has not contributed to an increase in lead exposure throughout the community.”

The briefing went on to estimate that it would cost “$60 million or more” to replace the more than 15,000 lead pipes that connect water mains to homes.

Very little of the text in the body of the e-mails was written by Snyder himself. The bulk of the messages are staffers writing to Snyder.

On Sept. 2, Snyder received an e-mail from Harvey Hollins, his director of the office of urban affairs, informing him that 1,500 donated water filters were distributed in Flint within four hours and at least 200 more people wanted them. The name of the donor who provided the filters is redacted from the e-mails though Hollins acknowledged that they “do not want any publicity or credit for their donation the donation.”

Snyder responded three days later: “Factually accurate update, but how did it go over with the residents?”

“It went over extremely well with the residents,” Hollins replied. “There is a demand for more.”

A week after Muchmore’s e-mail saying Flint couldn’t reconnect to Detroit’s system, the city was exploring a way to do just that.

Snyder did weigh in on the financial aspects of reconnection.

“We should help get all the facts on the consequences of changing back vs. staying and then determine what financing mechanisms we have available,” Snyder wrote in an Oct. 2 message to Muchmore, adding the administration needed “a clear side-by-side comparison of the health benefits and costs of (the Great Lakes Water Authority) vs. a more optimized Flint system. Also, we need to look at what financing mechanisms are available to Flint to pay for any higher cost actions. Please get people working on these two issues ASAP.”

On Oct. 6, Snyder wrote: “We need a better update system re: Flint water,” noting that he learned from the media that the Department of Health and Human Services announced the distribution of water filters.

“This should have come internally with more detail. I had press questions last night,” Snyder wrote. “Overall, we should have a daily report on Flint until our recommendations are fully implemented.”

Snyder then cited information he wanted including water test results, blood test results, the number of filters distributed and the analysis of proceeding with water from the Great Lakes Water Authority, the Flint River or the new authority.

(Staff writers Keith Matheny, Kristi Tanner and Rochelle Riley contributed to this report.)

©2016 Detroit Free Press. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Photo: Ariana Hawk, 25, is the single mother of three children under the age of ten living in Flint, Mich., with her mother. She bathes her middle child Sincere Smith, 2, who is unable to bathe with tap water. He is suffering from a breakouts all over his body that his mother believes are a reaction to the contaminated water. She must use bottled water to wash him daily. (Regina H. Boone/Detroit Free Press/TNS)

Actor as Donald Trump in Russia Today video ad

Screenshot from RT's 'Trump is here to make RT Great Again'

Russia Today, the network known in this country as RT, has produced a new "deep fake" video that portrays Donald Trump in post-presidential mode as an anchor for the Kremlin outlet. Using snippets of Trump's own voice and an actor in an outlandish blond wig, the ad suggests broadly that the US president is indeed a wholly owned puppet of Vladimir Putin– as he has so often given us reason to suspect.

"They're very nice. I make a lot of money with them," says the actor in Trump's own voice. "They pay me millions and hundreds of millions."

But when American journalists described the video as "disturbing," RT retorted that their aim wasn't to mock Trump, but his critics and every American who objects to the Russian manipulations that helped bring him to power.

As an ad for RT the video is amusing, but the network's description of it is just another lie. Putin's propagandists are again trolling Trump and America, as they've done many times over the past few years –- and this should be taken as a warning of what they're doing as Election Day approaches.

The Lincoln Project aptly observed that the Russians "said the quiet part out loud" this time, (Which is a bad habit they share with Trump.)