The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Michael Hiltzik, Los Angeles Times

The annual trustees reports for Social Security and Medicare customarily give rise to an outburst of disinformation from the enemies of social insurance programs — that comes with the territory when you’re putting out hundreds of pages densely packed with graphs, charts and statistics.

There may be less of that with the release of both reports Monday (months after the statutory deadline). That’s because “the news is essentially that there is no news,” as Kathy Ruffing of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a leading expert on Social Security, said during a conference call Monday on the Social Security report.

The trustees still estimate that the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted in 2033 — same as its estimate last year. The range of estimates places the date sometime between 2029 and 2041. Even then, the trustees say, there will still be enough money coming in each year to pay 77 percent of currently scheduled benefits. The trustees do, however, suggest that their best-case scenario for economic growth and other demographic and economic factors is brighter this year than in 2013.

Social Security recorded a surplus last year of $32 billion last year and is expected to record continued surpluses at least through 2019.

Any way you look at it, this program is not bankrupt, and not going bankrupt. Anyone who claims it is has given up his or her right to be taken seriously as a policy expert.

As for Medicare, there’s distinctly good news. The continuing drop in health care expenses has made Medicare healthier — the estimated date of its trust fund’s depletion has been moved out by four years, to 2030. That date has been moved off by 13 years since enactment of the Affordable Care Act.

In the words of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ Paul Van de Water, a former official of the Social Security Administration and the Congressional Budget Office, “Medicare spending per beneficiary in recent years has grown at historically low rates — 0.3 percent in 2012 and 0 in 2013.”

The Medicare trustees specifically, though carefully, ascribe a large portion of this reduction to Obamacare — to “substantial, but very uncertain, cost savings deriving from provisions of the Affordable Care Act.” These include reductions in the growth rate of reimbursements to doctors and hospitals.

Interestingly, the trustees suggest that the revised payment schedule will change patterns of healthcare delivery, as they should. Or else — if physician and hospital methods of delivering care to patients don’t change, the trustees say, the changes in reimbursement probably won’t be “viable indefinitely.”

The most important cautions in the reports concern Social Security disability, which is very much in trouble and crying out for urgent action by Congress. The disability trust fund, which is separate from the old-age program’s trust fund, looks poised to run out in 2016. At that point the program will be able to pay out only 81 percent of disability benefits. That might reduce the average monthly disability benefit of $1,146 today to about $928.

The trustees suggest that Congress shore up disability the same way that it did at the last such crisis, in 1995: simply allocate more of the Social Security payroll tax from the old-age program to disability.

The payroll tax is currently 12.4 percent of wages (up to a maximum of $117,000. If the disability allocation rose from 0.9 percentage point to 1.4 points over the next couple of years and then drifted back down, the disability fund would remain solvent through 2033; the old age fund’s exhaustion date would shift only slightly, from 2034 to 2033. That would give Congress a couple of decades to work out a longer-term fix.

But that requires Congress to get off its duff and treat the matter seriously. Are the lawmakers up to the challenge? Congressional conservatives, and a few lazy news organizations (I’m talking about you, 60 Minutes) have spent the last few months demonizing the typical disability recipient as a layabout and malingerer, which is contrary to the truth.

What’s scary is that their goal might be to rationalize cutting benefits in this all-important program, which represents a commitment made by the country to its most unfortunate workers. Social Security’s actuaries long ago established the disability case load is rising largely because of the aging of America, changes in the demographics of its workforce, and the deterioration of the economy.

Disability standards are stringent, the program is hard to get on, it’s not a ticket to wealth or a comfortable lifestyle, and it needs to be protected, not hollowed out. Monday’s trustee’s report underscores that reality, if Congress would only pay attention.

After it gets back from its five-week vacation, that is.

Image: Donkey Hotey via Flickr

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

FBI Director Chris Wray told members of Congress on Tuesday that the number of domestic terror cases in the United States has "exploded" over the past year and a half, confirming many suspicions surrounding the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

On Tuesday, Wray told members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that the FBI's domestic terrorism caseload has "more than doubled" since the spring of 2020, "from about 1,000 to around 2,700 investigations."

Keep reading... Show less

Reprinted with permission from DailyKos

On Monday, Rep. Bennie Thompson made it clear that the House Select Committee investigating events related to the January 6 insurgency could begin issuing subpoenas within the next few days. Back on August 25, the committee sent a request for documents to a long list of recipients. While some recipients have turned over the requested information, a large number have not. As CNN reports, Thompson will skip right past the farce of sending any of these people or groups reminders or asking them politely to show up at the House. Instead, the committee will move straight to the subpoena phase and let the courts tell them how much executive privilege does not apply to this case.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}