The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Washington (AFP) – The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to hear a case that would determine if someone convicted of domestic violence could be allowed, in some cases, to own a gun.

The top U.S. court, the final arbiter of America’s most burning legal questions, will hear a challenge to a 1996 law making it illegal for someone to possess a firearm if they have been convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence involving physical force or a deadly weapon.

James Castleman, from Tennessee, in 2001 pleaded guilty under that state’s law to one count of “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” against the mother of his child.

In 2009, he was found to be in possession of various guns and was charged with “illegal possession of a firearm by a person convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence.”

At the time, he allegedly was purchasing guns and selling them on the black market.

But in September of last year, a U.S. appeals court in Cincinnati, Ohio ruled that the federal weapons law does not apply in Castleman’s case.

The appeals court judge threw out the charges because Tennessee’s misdemeanor domestic assault law does not require that physical force be used — a very low standard in the eyes of the federal court.

But the Obama administration, in its challenge to the appeals court ruling, wrote in a court petition that the ruling, if allowed to stand, would render the law “largely inoperative,” since various states have differing definitions for what constitutes domestic violence.

The court is to hear arguments in the case next January.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump Now Leads An Authoritarian Movement

Politico Magazine published an article Thursday that perfectly embodies the failures of tabloid-style political journalism to address the fundamental dangers facing the country: “145 Things Donald Trump Did in His First Year as the Most Consequential Former President Ever.”

“In ways both absurd and serious, the 45th president refused to let go of the spotlight or his party and redefined what it means to be a former leader of the free world,” the article sub-headline states, sitting above a colorful image containing a photo of a smiling Trump and images that have defined his post-presidency, including his second impeachment, golf clubs, and a vaccination needle.

Keep reading... Show less

Howard Stern Has A Blunt Message For Anti-Vaxxers

Shock Jock Howard Stern had some blunt words for the selfish anti-vaxxer crowd that refuses to grasp the grounded science behind vaccines. Stern, by no means a supporter of government intervention into the private lives of citizens, prides himself as a thoughtful citizen who regards vaccination as the most basic thing you can do as a citizen. Stern, who has used his Sirius/XM platform in the past to scold Trumpers, is absolutely done with anti-vaxxers and their never-ending stream of idiotic conspiracies.

In the clip below, Stern shoots down stupid anti-vax theories of "magnetism."

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}