Tag: election deniers
Peter Ticktin

MAGA Election Deniers Look Like Idiots Now, But They Will Be Back

In the aftermath of the midterms, it is clear that the faltering but resilient election denial movement — made up of a strange amalgamation of MAGA media figures and their allies in government —- lost in every conceivable way.

Democrats won the House and Senate by historic margins, deflating all but a few deadenders who were still trying to claim voter fraud until the last minute. On election night, even former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, whose War Room podcast has been a hub of the denialist movement, looked for enemies to blame more than supposed fraud to undercover.

But any hopes that the election denial fever has permanently broken are premature. Rejecting Democratic Party wins remains a core, foundational element of the movement that Trump built and will likely continue to be one for the foreseeable future.

To MAGA media, bad polls were a “psyop”

By the final weeks of the campaign, MAGA media was staring down major losses with few counterattacks other than to criticize polling, an act of desperation that aged poorly.

The talking point solidified around late September, when Bannon called the midterm polling a “psyop,” a term his guest, Republican strategist Alex DeGrasse, agreed with. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts also said the data was a “psyop by so many of these polling firms in order to do what, to depress conservative turnout.” And right-wing media figure John Solomon suggested that public polling was potentially a “suppression tool,” citing his guest, Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-FL).

MAGA media gadfly Wayne Allyn Root was pushing that line until the eve of the election, arguing that “anyone who believes polls in Texas showing that Talafreako is winning is a fool.”

These types of claims echo Fox News’ editorial approach to the 2020 election. In the final days before voters cast their ballots that year, Fox regularly used anecdotal evidence to suggest that the race was much closer than polls suggested, thereby helping to set the stage for the January 6 riot. The events of that day wouldn’t have been possible had right-wing media not fully embraced and amplified false narratives about insecure elections, underscoring how the so-called election integrity movement is fundamentally anti-democratic.

For years within MAGA media it has been taken as gospel that any discrepancies in polling — including phenomena like a “red mirage” that misleadingly shows Republicans with an early lead — is proof positive of voter fraud. Last minute attempts by right-wing media to seed that doubt again this cycle seem to have proven inadequate, given the losses Republicans faced across the country, but nonetheless were one tool in the toolbox.

The plots failed, but it wasn’t for a lack of trying from MAGA media

The denialist movement’s recent strategies and tactics coalesced at times, but the coalition was deeply disorganized by the time the polls opened.

Over the summer, MAGA media figures like former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and conspiracy theorist Wayne Allyn Root, concocted a conspiracy in plain sight that aimed to push Trump to declare a national emergency or issue an executive order seizing control of election systems. That didn’t happen.

Former Colorado county clerk Tina Peters, a hero in the election denial movement, and her lawyer, Peter Ticktin, who claims to be a childhood friend of Trump’s, allegedly met with the president in the White House on at least two occasions since June. Peters has said that she called on Trump to issue an executive order banning machines or mail-in ballots. That didn’t happen either.

Right-wing media spent months urging Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which would’ve mandated federal voter ID laws and would’ve forced people to prove their citizenship at the time of registration. The act has been stalled for months, and has no path to becoming law at this point.

Bannon spent over a year calling for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to stalk polling sites. That didn’t happen. Neither did the Trump administration heed the call from right-wing media figure Jerome Corsi, who reportedly circulated a draft national emergency order, to deploy the military or National Guard to administer or otherwise oversee elections.

As of right now, there is no indication that Trump has the appetite to declare martial law after the election but before certification, as Ticktin has repeatedly called for. Nor are there signs that his administration will attempt to seize voting machines or ballots.

For as much as these figures were desperate to spread confusion in the run-up to voting and sow doubt afterwards, they have largely failed.

Election denial remains at the core of MAGA

After a political movement attempts an insurrection like we saw on January 6, 2021, it is a mistake not to take their threats seriously. The coalition that made that day possible was composed of longtime conservative movement lawyers like Cleta Mitchell and John Eastman, former advisers like Bannon, and right-wing media figures like Alex Jones and the late Charlie Kirk, all of whom came together in an action designed to prevent the certification of a federal election.

Similarly, the plot to subvert the midterms before they happened included then-Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte and his chief of staff, as well as media figures like Peters, Ticktin, Root, and more. Under the second Trump term, the boundaries between top government official and bizarre curiosity on an obscure livestream are not clear, which makes it a challenge to evaluate whether the MAGA media kooks and cranks that make up so much of his social life really have their hands of the levers of power or if they are simply gassing themselves up to impress their audiences.

In this case, many of the most bombastic and anti-democratic proposals ultimately went nowhere or failed — but, like a zombie, the election denial movement is brainless but not dead. Root, for his part, responded to the results by arguing that the election was stolen but also that Republicans deserved to lose. Mitchell wrote on social media that the “work of securing our elections is FAR from completed,” while failing to articulate any concrete next steps. True the Vote, a key organization in this space, sent out a fundraising request the morning after the midterms. Trump-aligned think tank the America First Policy Institute is seeking information about the administration of elections in Minnesota. And MAGA “prophet” Julie Green said: “There was a red wave last night. It was stolen.”

Bannon recently said in a CBS News interview that “the core belief of the MAGA movement is we won the 2020 election.” That load-bearing myth will likely continue to be central to whatever political formation arrives after Trump shuffles off the stage.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Behind Steve Bannon's Election Unreality Show, A Gang Of Supervillains

Behind Steve Bannon's Election Unreality Show, A Gang Of Supervillains

Three weeks to go and this season of The Trump Show is barreling toward its riveting midterm denouement.

A dawn DHS raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s house – a timely stunt to remind xenophobes that their hero can do something about a brown woman in a headscarf. ICE blasting away with live ammo on the streets of New York for maximum attention. Armed National Guardsmen posing by DC ballot boxes.

And now, the big crowd-pleasing reveal: a shrieking diva cast into oblivion.

Yes, they’re throwing Kimberly “The Best is Yet to Come!” Guilfoyle under the bus. The Mar-a-Lago-faced hellion has had a long career as a brazen hustler; her game was well known before she was confirmed as America’s ambassador to Greece. Trump always casts a few women who can play borderline personality disorder, and Guilfoyle will serve as a timely pre-election distraction from the catastrophes of war, gas prices, environmental ruination, self-dealing and the Grand Grifts of the Brothers and Son-in-Law.

Plus – someone else has likely bid high to live in the State Department’s luxurious Athens mansion for the next two years.

If you’re not MAGA, you’re probably not tuned in to the chief midterm narrator explaining all this. But “War Room” podcaster and Trump whisperer Steve Bannon continues to mesmerixe millions of MAGA sheeple who still buy that he’s a populist on their side – even though, just like the man he shills for, the most cursory reading of the Epstein files shows him to be an Epstein Class A all-access passholder.

As we have reported before, with receipts, Bannon is one of the great wannabe globalists, leveraging his insider knowledge of the White House and Epstein’s contacts to gain access to the highest echelons of Gulf royalty and the EU’s Nazi-adjacent political backrooms.

The House Oversight Committee has not yet bothered to subpoena Bannon, even though he was one of Epstein’s closest late-in-life buddies and his communications with Jeff suggest at least an awareness of the trafficking schemes. Bannon did prison time for blowing off his last congressional subpoena, so that might factor into the committee’s considerations. His “I fought the law and the law won” four month prison stint followed by Trump’s pardon have made him as immune as Big Daddy in some ways. For the moment anyway.

Since 2020, Bannon has been cheerleading a right-wing coup, broadcasting twice a day via a media company called Real America’s Voice (RAV). He admits that The Big Lie is the tentpole of the MAGA movement, calls for armed guards at polling places and urges his listeners to serve as election deniers (aka meddlers) on precinct committees. He even suggested that they might carry weapons to their polling places. At a “Fraud Fighter Summit” this summer, he gave activists a dozen congressional districts to target, adding that legal sidearms would not be a bad idea. “We need to be at every precinct. If you’re armed or not, that depends upon what your state laws are.”

The claque of supervillains behind RAV, the media company that platforms Bannon’s two-hour twice-a-day bray, is so baroquely evil that the concept of it probably wouldn’t even fly in a Marvel Comics writers’ room.

RAV founder Robert Sigg makes Rupert Murdoch look like Jimmy Stewart. He is a convicted felon and fraudster with a long rap sheet. The federal case against him involved a large identity theft scheme in which he and his cohorts ran help-wanted ads in a Denver newspaper to solicit job applicants, “promising salaries of more than $100,000, for the sole purpose of obtaining the applicants’ personal identification information to obtain the fraudulent mortgage loans.” His rap sheet, according to a Denver news site, also includes: selling or distributing drugs; burglary; assault; assault and battery; resisting or obstructing arrest; domestic violence; driving under the influence of drugs; being a habitual traffic offender; harassment; and drug possession.

But wait – there’s a chip off the old block! Sigg’s son Austin is currently serving a 40-year prison sentence in Colorado for kidnapping a fifth grader off the streets of suburban Denver when he was 17, zip-tying and sexually assaulting her before dismembering her. The lad’s defense included the allegation that his mom – one of Robert Sigg’s wives – sniffed glue while pregnant.

Austin’s younger brother, Parker Sigg, is RAV’s vice president and has been serving as Bannon’s War Room White House pool reporter. When the five major pool outlets recently boycotted Trump coverage in solidarity with their banished colleagues at CNN, Parker Sigg and RAV stepped in to do their own “free pool coverage.” They are continuing to provide it to this day, meaning this super sketchy “news” outlet now has top-level security access to the White House and Trump’s travel.

“We’re gonna continue giving real time updates to everybody,” the younger Sigg chirped on a recent War Room podcast. “This is extremely unique. There are other systems that have been around that the legacy media has used. I don’t believe there’s been anything as streamlined or sophisticated as this. We did this in little to no time. We set this up and beta tested it in 24-48 hours. People are really enjoying it. We’re going to continue to put updates out, make it easier to use, and make it more accessible.”

Through RAV, Bannon is in deep with the Siggs financially, as was his corrupt Chinese pal Guo Wengui, whose backers bought in early. It is still possible to be amazed at how, even for bottom-feeder Bannon, there is no rock under which the failed Hollywood auteur won’t look for a business partner.

Maybe it pays off: RAV is becoming the media home of choice for die-hard election deniers and conspiracy theorists too far gone for FOX or OAN. RAV platformed Jack Posiobiec, the first person to tweet “Stop the Steal,” and just launched a new Ed Martin show to platform his election conspiracy theories. The former Missouri politician and lawyer was a lead organizer of Stop the Steal and a fundraiser for the J6 rioters, who also oversaw their mass pardons as acting DC Attorney. He left the DOJ in August after overseeing another raft of eye-popping and allegedly corrupt Trump pardons but – to his professional detriment – failed to fulfill The Boss’s lawfare vengeance schemes.

Among RAV’s other graduates cavorting in the sweaty DC MAGA clubhouse is Beni Rae Harmony, who once posed in a “Fuck Biden” shirt with an AR-15 strapped across her chest. Big Daddy Donald has made Beni Rae understudy to the new White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia. (Zacharia is another lady nutter who could be in the running to become Trump’s next Guilfoyle/Noem/Omarosa. She apparently agrees that Trump sends QAnon-coded messages from rally podiums, with the number of times he sips from a water bottle supposedly carrying a secret signal.)

Last week, War Secretary Hegseth announced, during a RAV interview with Jack Posobiec, that Nidal Hasan’s execution by firing squad would be livestreamed for the public. Will RAV get the exclusive pay-per-view?

In the run-up to the election, Real America’s Voice is ever more a contender in the contest for market share of MAGAs with an appetite for crazy. FOX News is giving more play to Trump criticism, even inviting Muslim “communists” like Abdul El-Sayed to parlay with Jesse Watters. The DOJ is pursuing an antitrust probe against the mainstream media companies over their boycott last month, while the White House press office veers deeper into the extremist swamp. RAV and Bannon are uniquely positioned to fill the widening gap between reality and unreality with the laughing gas of MAGA midterm delirium.

Nina Burleigh is a journalist, author, documentary producer, and adjunct professor at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She has written eight books including her recently published novel, Zero Visibility Possible.

Katie Chenoweth is associate professor of French at Princeton University and an investigative researcher

Reprinted with permission from American Freakshow

Wayne Allyn Root and Donald Trump

White House Aides Face MAGA Extremists Urging 'Martial Law' On Election Day

On Wednesday, new reporting revealed that many in President Donald Trump's orbit believe he will declare "martial law" to seize control of the midterms. This is according to The Atlantic, which spoke with several people close to Trump who asserted he is likely to claim a "national security emergency" to justify efforts to "seize control of the federal elections."

For example, attorney Peter Ticktin -- who went to school with Trump when they were teenagers, helped Trump sue Hillary Clinton, and pushed the president to pardon convicted election equipment tamperer Tina Peters — said there are three possible outcomes in November. As The Atlantic notes, he asserts that, "The first — a smooth election — won’t happen in his view because, he claims without evidence, Democrats already cheated in the primaries. The second is that Trump takes action before the election to prevent cheating. The last option is that Trump tries to declare martial law on or around November 3."

Or in Ticktin's words, "Either martial law, or step aside." When The Atlantic's reporters raised the possibility of riots if Trump were to overturn the election results, Ticktin said he was not concerned: "Believe me, our armed forces are a lot bigger than they are."

Trump has not been shy about signaling his intention to meddle in the midterms. As The Atlantic explains, "In August, when the television and radio host Wayne Allyn Root pushed Trump to declare a 'national-security emergency' to require proof of citizenship, voter ID, and other measures, Trump played coy: 'Let me just say that stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that.' Later that month, Trump posted a Root column on the topic, with a headline that described the plan as 'foolproof.' Peters announced after meeting with Trump in June that the president 'basically said to his lead counsel to do what I was asking.' In a prime-time address at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump again repeated the false claim that he had won the 2020 election, and sarcastically encouraged his supporters to 'cheat like hell' in the upcoming elections."

And MAGA literally applauds such plans. Speaking at a recent conference for election deniers, Root described a "nightmare scenario" in which Democrats won, flipped Congress, then impeached the president. He received a standing ovation after assuring attendees that, according to research done by a friend, the election would be upended if Trump were to declare a national-security emergency."

Trump is so adamant about these efforts that, according to The Atlantic, "Trump’s White House and Cabinet advisers have been working for months to move Trump’s focus away from baseless theories of election fraud peddled by people like Ticktin, Root, and Peters ... But the prospect of Trump deciding to act on the demands of his most fervent election-denying supporters has remained a constant threat, one that even Trump’s inner circle admits remains possible."

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet


Election Deniers -- Led By Tina Peters -- Pitch A Midterm 'Security Plan' To White House

Election Deniers -- Led By Tina Peters -- Pitch A Midterm 'Security Plan' To White House

A group of activists in the election denial community — including Tina Peters, a former Colorado election official convicted of charges related to the 2020 election, and Clay Parikh, who has served as a “special government employee” for the Trump administration — claim they presented a key government agency responsible for protecting elections with “operational guidance” for the midterms in the form of a “risk mitigation” and “practical election-security plan” to implement in the 100 days before the elections. The proposal appears to be the latest attempt to push the Trump administration to take over election processes ahead of the midterms.

The new proposal, dated July 22 and called the “100-Day Risk Mitigation Election Plan” and “Operational Guidance for the November Federal Election – 2026,” urges the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency — an agency housed under the Department of Homeland Security that is “one of the main federal partners for states on election security, sharing intelligence on potential threats to voting infrastructure and providing quick regional support,” per MS NOW — to “concentrate on six achievable measures,” including “transition[ing] the general electorate away from ballot-marking devices (BMD) to hand-marked paper ballots” and “insisting that the official count can only be certified after a full hand-count of every ballot.”

It also lays out an implementation framework that would involve classifying all counties based on current election processes and their ability to transition ahead of the midterms and then providing each county with implementation plans. During a podcast interview discussing the plan, Peters acknowledged that “CISA is not a forceful body that they can make people do things, but they can actually make recommendations,” and suggested that DHS could use a recently announced grant for states “that comply with certain things like paper ballots and so on and so forth” as an “incentive.”

Voting machines and tabulators have been the target of election conspiracy theories for years, sparking campaigns to replace them with full hand-counts. As experts have explained, a system of hand-counted paper ballots would be less accurate, more expensive, impractical, and “potentially riskier than the current system of machines with auditable paper trails that almost all cities and states use.” Studies have actually shown that “hand-counting ballots produces more errors than machine tabulation,” and as the Brennan Center for Justice has explained, “Many checks exist to ensure that voting machines count ballots correctly and produce accurate election results.”

Peters released the new proposal, which she called a “practical election-security plan,” on her website along with a July 24 letter to the acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency thanking him “for meeting with us … and for giving us the opportunity to present our concerns and proposed path forward for the 2026 federal election.”

These are the figures who signed the letter to CISA:

  • Peters, who publicly released the plan, is the former county clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, and was “convicted in 2024 for her role in a brazen plot to examine voting machines under her control after the 2020 election” before Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis commuted her sentence. She met with Trump at the Oval Office in late June, later claiming that she told him, “If we don’t fix these machines, if we don’t get rid of these machines, we’re going to lose the next election.”
  • Parikh, who has served as a “special government employee” in the Trump administration and who was cited in the FBI’s warrant for its raid of a Fulton County, Georgia, election facility. Parikh was also involved in Kari Lake’s unsuccessful legal effort to claim fraud was involved in her 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election defeat and has reportedly “served as a witness in other cases … challenging the use of voting machines.”
  • Conrad Reynolds, a podcast host who reportedly ”thinks Arkansas voting machines could be flipping votes” and who was involved with Restore Election Integrity Arkansas and its push for an amendment “aimed at requiring all elections in Arkansas to be conducted with paper ballots and removing language in the Arkansas Constitution that permits elections to be conducted by voting machines.” Reynolds has also run the Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative, which has aimed for “getting rid of voting machines” in favor of paper ballots.
  • Will Huff, who often co-hosts Reynolds’ podcast and has pushed election-related conspiracy theories about “dirty voter rolls” and “the mail-in ballot scheme.” Huff has also been involved with Restore Election Integrity Arkansas and the Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative.

Peters also explained the proposal during a July 27 podcast appearance, claiming that Trump's July 16 speech indicated “a lot has come out about the vulnerabilities of our election infrastructure.”

TINA PETERS (GUEST): Now, so — and that’s in that 14-page memo to CISA. But here’s what you can do. If we cannot physically get rid of the machines before November, then having — you know, taking the preliminary count that comes from the machines, but not certifying the election until — and however long it takes — until finishing up the hand-count. Then, if those two things don’t meet, then then you know.

So it’s a way if you’re — if you use that as your preliminary results and then you have — I’m going to say it again — then you have an actual hand-count, however long it takes to get it done, and then you have the certification. The thing of it is is that a lot of the judges that are put in the place to certify the results are taking the word of an electronic device. They can't actually see that, yes, we had a group of people, Democrat and Republican, that have checked this out.

It’s just like, you would always check your bank ledger, right? You just, you know, check, make sure everything is, you know, before you realize that it’s valid. That’s what we need. And if it take — right now, they’re taking how many weeks to finish an election anyway, right?

Additionally, Peters said on the podcast that she had urged Trump during their Oval Office meeting to fire members of the Election Assistance Commission — which Trump subsequently did.

Trump expanded his control over election processes, while election deniers seek even more

In recent months, Trump and his right-wing media allies have advocated for passage of the SAVE America Act and other policies to increase federal control of the midterms. As USA Today reported, “Trump is working to gain unprecedented control of the 2026 U.S. midterm elections” with “a series of new assertions of presidential power.” These actions have included firing key leaders of the federal Election Assistance Commission, putting election deniers in administration positions that oversee elections, and issuing executive orders that would tighten rules for mail-in voting and create a federal list of U.S. citizens eligible to vote.

ProPublica also noted that Trump “eviscerat[ed] CISA” at the start of his second term, replaced career election specialists at the Department of Homeland Security with his allies, including some who have ties to the election denial movement, and “discarded or diminished other federal initiatives with roles in protecting election integrity or blocking foreign interference.”

Right-wing media and election deniers have called for the president to further expand his power by issuing a national emergency executive order that would supposedly give Trump “essentially king-like powers” over the midterms. Two of the signatories of the letter to CISA — Reynolds and Huff — have called for the declaration of such a “national emergency,” and Peters has said she believes “Trump could sign an executive order to get rid of the machines and say that they are — that a vendor cannot have that much influence over our elections.” As part of those calls, election deniers reportedly circulated a draft of a proposed executive order within the administration, and right-wing media figures appear to be weaving together a narrative about foreign interference in American elections by countries like China and Venezuela that could be used as a “predicate” for a national emergency.

The new proposal to CISA from Peters and the others in the election denial community appears to be the latest attempt to control election processes for the midterms.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World