Tag: paul rosenzweig
Moms, Dads, Teachers, Vets Stand Up To Boss Trump's Personal Gestapo In Portland

Moms, Dads, Teachers, Vets Stand Up To Boss Trump's Personal Gestapo In Portland

"Down with the Wall of Moms!"

"Death to the Leaf-Blower Dads!"

In George Orwell's classic novel 1984, members of the Inner Party stood in front of their telescreens daily to revile Big Brother's enemies and exult in his power. "Long live Boss Trump!"

Just so Fox News' excited coverage of Portland's "Wall of Moms" in their Covid masks and bicycle helmets confronting Trump's mercenaries in full combat gear. A second group calling themselves "Leaf-Blower Dads" are using lawn equipment to force tear gas barrages back into in the faces of the Storm Troopers who fired them.

Classic American ingenuity, if you think about it. Also a reminder that in Portland, the majority of dangerous, violent "anarchists" Boss Trump warns against are unarmed women and suburban men with yards and garages who know their way around Home Depot.

But they're not having an invasion of Trump's personal Gestapo: paramilitary forces wearing no insignia, with no badge numbers or names, and accountable to nobody.

People are coming out in thousands to defend their community from an invasion. There's also a "Wall of Vets," and "Teachers against Tyrants." That's why Portland's mayor, Oregon's governor and its two U.S. Senators have demanded the Federal agents' removal. They'd had the situation under control before the troops arrived. Which is not to nominate protest leaders for sainthood. There are opportunists and fools of every political persuasion.

Also, history teaches, provocateurs all too willing to smash windows, loot and burn for purposes of their own. During rioting at the Chicago Democratic convention in 1968, some of the angriest hotheads turned out to cops impersonating anti-Vietnam war activists.

In Portland, however, Boss Trump's crowing about his agents tear-gassing Mayor Ted Wheeler as he addressed protest marchers ("They knocked the hell out of him," he boasted on Fox News) was received with contempt: the bravado of a flabby blowhard who's hidden behind bodyguards all his life. He has approximately the same chance of winning Oregon's electoral votes as I do—and I'm not on the ballot.

If that offends you, dear reader, riddle me this: what would have been your reaction if a phalanx of anonymous, masked Federal agents had assaulted, say, a Tea Party demonstration during the Obama administration?

If you're a conservative, it might be like Paul Rosenzweig's, a career Republican who was one of Kenneth Starr's keenest sleuths in the Great Bill Clinton Sex Investigation. Writing in The Atlantic, he argued that invading Portland "is a complete corruption of conservative ideals. There is nothing conservative about unconstitutional police activity, and there is nothing conservative about unilateral federal intervention in state affairs. Those are the acts of an authoritarian."

Rosenzweig and co-author Arthur Rizer also quote Tom Ridge, former Republican governor of Pennsylvania and Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush: DHS "was not established to be the president's personal militia."

See, while prating about being a "Law and Order president," Trump is doing everything he can to provoke violence, hoping it will frighten suburban voters into holding Joe Biden somehow responsible—despite Biden's history as a pro-cop liberal throughout his long career. Also to somehow distract voters from the 150,000 Americans who have died due to his negligence and incompetence in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Of course when Richard Nixon successfully played the "Law and Order" card in 1968, Lyndon Johnson was president. Nixon's opponent was Vice-president Hubert Humphrey. So far polls show that Trump has had no success convincing anybody outside his hardcore base that others are responsible for the violence he's working so hard to provoke.

But there are three months to go, and discord is spreading across the country. Seattle, Oakland, Louisville, Aurora, CO, etc. Rival groups are carrying guns and itching for a fight.

In Austin, a man carrying an AK-47 got shot to death by a man in a car suspected of trying to run civil rights marchers down. The mayor of Richmond, VA has alleged that "white supremacists marching under the banner of Black Lives Matter" violently disrupted an otherwise peaceful protest.

The only things restraining Trump are his cowardice and fear of getting caught. "Rightly or wrongly," writes my man Charles Pierce "this puts the responsibility on the protestors themselves…it's time for the burning of police stations and other acts of violence to stop. It's time for folks to stop hurling themselves mindlessly into the face of faceless law-enforcement."

Way past time, actually. In Portland (and elsewhere), activists could foil Trump by simply staging demonstrations some distance from Federal property. Let the Trump Troopers gas each other. Activists need to shout down apostles of violence; turn vandals and arsonists over to legitimate law enforcement. Above all, emulate John Lewis, the great civil rights icon lying in state, who understood the folly of rioting and the overwhelming moral authority of non-violent mass resistance.

Paul Rosenzweig, Former Starr Prosecutor, Shreds Trump’s Obstruction

Paul Rosenzweig, Former Starr Prosecutor, Shreds Trump’s Obstruction

Trump’s attempts to stonewall Congress and block the legislative branch from conducting oversight are blatant acts of obstruction of justice and are in violation of the Constitution — according to conservative Republican lawyer Paul Rosenzweig, who served as a senior counsel on the team led by Kenneth Starr that investigated former President Bill Clinton back in the 1990s.

The former Starr counsel testified Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee, which was conducting a hearing on Trump’s stonewalling of Congress. Trump has been doing so by banning current and former administration officials from complying with congressional subpoenas, and asserting executive privilege when no executive privilege is warranted.

Rosenzweig pointed out that he is not often called to testify by Democratic members of Congress, but that in this case he stands with Democrats who believe that Trump’s attempts to avoid congressional oversight are wrong.

“Adherence to the rule of law means that rules have to be applied even-handedly, regardless of whether a political party or other interest is immediately benefited,” Rosenzweig said in a witness statement to the House Judiciary Committee. “It means not invoking privileges to conceal wrongdoing; and it means not invoking them to frustrate legitimate congressional inquiry.”

Rosenzweig went on to say that he believes Trump’s attempts to assert executive privilege, such as trying to retroactively declare special counsel Robert Mueller’s report to be secret, are unconstitutional.

“If you continue to think that President Clinton’s use of the privilege to avoid scrutiny of his actions was
violative of his oath of office and deserving of condemnation — as I do — you can say no less
about President Trump,” he said.

Rosenzweig concluded: “Sadly, today, it increasingly appears that the president is acting in a manner designed to denigrate and disregard checks on his use of executive authority. To date, his actions appear unable to distinguish between the public interests that undergird the privilege and his own personal and political interests.”

Republicans in Congress might be A-OK with standing idly by as Trump obstructs their legitimate oversight powers.

But as this Republican lawyer showed, there’s no good reason for it to be a partisan issue.

Published with permission of The American Independent.