Tag: steve witkoff
Kushner and Witkoff

How Kushner And Witkoff, Dimbulb Diplomats, Failed Utterly In Iran Talks

Two of U.S. President Donald Trump's close allies, special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and the president's son-in-law Jared Kushner, have been key players in negotiations with Iran during a war that has lasted for six and one-half months. But a former White House official, according to The New Yorker, is highly critical off their performance, saying they are committing "total malpractice."

In The New Yorker, reporter Derek Filkins explains, "In the waning hours before the U.S. went to war with Iran, this February, Jared Kushner held a meeting with Iranian negotiators in Geneva — one last chance to avoid a conflict that would plunge the region into chaos and shock the world economy. Afterward, Kushner dismissed his counterparts as unworthy of his time. 'Lots of tricks,' he told reporters. 'They're basically playing games with us all over the place, and it's very, very slippery.'"

Filkins continues, "Kushner, the boyish-looking son-in-law of Donald Trump, has been given an extraordinary brief in recent years. Along with Steve Witkoff, the president's special envoy, he has been charged with ending wars in Gaza, Ukraine, and just about anywhere else they might break out. Kushner, who is 45, has little regard for the craft of diplomacy."According to New Yorker sources, Kushner and Witkoff dropped the ball badly when it came to negotiations with Iran.

Filkins reports, "A former diplomat briefed on the talks with Iran told me that, when the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, began offering concessions, the two Americans failed to grasp precisely what was on the table. They sought advice from Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, but Grossi was attending the talks as a neutral party. A former White House official who worked on the Iranian nuclear issue was aghast at the lack of preparation: 'The Iranians come to you with a proposal. What does it actually mean? How much does it actually set them back — two months or two years? What are the work-arounds? For them not to have technical advisers there is just total malpractice."

Filkins reports that at another press conference, Kushner "argued that the Iranians were merely stalling."

According to the reporter, "'They were just trying to buy time in order to preserve whatever they could, to get past the term of President Trump,' he said. Another former White House official I spoke to largely shared that assessment. 'It was the same old game,' he said. 'The Iranian position is: We get a s–– ton of sanctions relief, and we do nothing to dismantle our nuclear infrastructure.' But some experts who followed the talks thought that Araghchi’s proposals were made in earnest. Among other things, the Iranians were offering to suspend nuclear enrichment entirely, which they had not done before, and to dilute the enriched uranium that they still retained."

Virginia Canter, a former White House counsel, is also highly critical of Kushner's handling of Iran negotiations.Canter told The New Yorker, "Kushner is plagued with conflicts of interest. He is supposed to be working for the American people, but in fact, he has tremendous financial incentives to further the interests of his investors."

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

The World's Most Powerful Man, Still Stuck In America's Most Stupid War

The World's Most Powerful Man, Still Stuck In America's Most Stupid War

As the "memorandum of understanding" that was supposed to herald the end of Donald Trump's war on Iran expires, so may the American public's patience with his tragic clowning on the global stage. The world's leaders lost patience with Trump long ago, except for American adversaries like Vladmir Putin and Xi Jinping, who benefit enormously from his incompetence and malice.

What the expiration exposes, as if everyone had not already worked this out, is that Trump's impetuous warmaking has boxed the United States into a diplomatic and military cul-de-sac, leaving us and our allies in a worse position without achieving any of his stated goals.

The only initiative that Trump appears capable of accomplishing is to make a truly historic debacle even worse — by threatening, as he told a Fox News reporter, to "bomb the shit" out of our allies in the Gulf state of Oman, who have tried to serve as a negotiating conduit with Iran. Evidently Trump is frustrated by the Omani inability to solve his self-imposed conundrum, and angry that, like our other allies in the region, they feel growing pressure to find a way to open the Strait of Hormuz. They were probably not comforted to see Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth puffing himself up to declare that we can keep the strait blocked "indefinitely."

Hegseth's vow would appear to contradict Trump's frequent public lying about that waterway, which he has described as "open" thanks to the U.S. military presence. Neither Hegseth's boasting nor Trump's prevaricating has assuaged the pain of rising energy costs for everyone, including American consumers. As voters, they must be wondering how best to punish this feckless and foolish leadership, whose pitiful record now includes their failure to provide decent living conditions for our sailors on the ships patrolling the Mideast waterways on extended missions.

Bereft of any strategic capacity on his own, and surrounded by clowns and frauds in top national security positions, the president of the United States, the most powerful man in the world, can find no way out of the ongoing crisis that he alone created.

The end of the ceasefire, according to the White House, will shortly result in additional "crushing" sanctions against Iran, which will feel familiar to the Iranians and seems unlikely to accomplish anything beyond that same tactic's failure so far. Nor are any of the other choices available to Trump very promising.

He can start bombing Iran again, which doesn't seem to move the regime toward meeting any of Trump's demands. He can try to resume negotiations, with the full knowledge that the Iranians are not going to meet his maximal demands on their disarmament and nuclear program. Or he can simply walk away, as Nate Swanson, an Iran expert at the Atlantic Council, hinted Trump might do — and then try to explain to the nation and the world why we wasted the lives of Iranians and Americans, as well as a vast treasure and a military stockpile, for nothing.

Like Trump himself, we have no idea what will come next in this disastrous misadventure. We do know that the Russians and the Chinese, our authoritarian adversaries, have profited mightily from this president's bumbling, stumbling, megalomaniacal conduct of foreign and economic policy.

What we also know is that this diplomatic dead end was perfectly predictable by anyone who has paid attention. Without any particular expertise in Iranian or Gulf affairs, I predicted it last April, when an earlier ceasefire expired and Trump sent his envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, to negotiate with the Iranians.

"Even if Donald Trump had actually written The Art of the Deal' (he didn't write a word of that bestseller, his first big fraud), it would be foolish to expect that the president or his hapless envoys can deliver a viable agreement with the Iranians anytime soon. Taken together, they lack all the qualities required to achieve the complex diplomatic resolution required in this crisis — like the (nuclear) agreement that Trump so cavalierly discarded in 2017...

"The problem isn't only that Trump and his team of morons neglected to fashion any plan for their sudden urge to attack a faraway country with a million men under arms, a big weapons arsenal, and a long history of ideological resilience. That was a historic and particularly stupid mistake, characteristic of Trump's shallow intellect — but now, after inflicting massive damage on Iran, the world and our own economy, he and his government are evidently stuck in the quagmire they created."

In these circumstances, being right is seriously overrated. I would far rather have been wrong.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is available wherever books are sold.

Welcome To Trump Bank, The First Family's Latest Crooked Crypto Venture

Welcome To Trump Bank, The First Family's Latest Crooked Crypto Venture

Yes, the crypto scammer wing of the Trump family business, World Liberty Financial, now has a federally chartered bank thanks to a morally flexible President Donald Trump appointee, Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould.

What could possibly go wrong?

You know, we knew this was coming for a while now, as World Liberty’s application had been kicking around for months. They’re not applying to run a traditional bank, so you won’t be able to get a loan or open some sort of Trump MAGA checking account.

So what does this bank do if not the normal things banks do? Do you really need to ask? It’s gonna be a crypto grift bank, of course. It lets World Liberty issue its stablecoin, USD1, which has proven a terrific bribe vehicle for the president, without needing to use a third-party crypto company to issue the currency.

I don’t speak fluent crypto, but presumably there are good—as in grifty—reasons for this that will better line Trump’s pockets.

World Liberty is really just a way to get in good with Trump if you’re a foreign government that wants to do it on the down low. You can buy hundreds of millions worth of the Trump stablecoin to curry favor, which is exactly what Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the national security adviser for the United Arab Emirates, did in February.

And look, crypto grifting has been very, very good to Trump. He made $1.4 billion in 2025, with nearly $800 million of that from his stake in World Liberty. It helps, of course, that Trump can set government policy however he wants to ensure maximum profits and minimal oversight. So, he reined in both the Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to make sure his crypto interests don’t suffer from too much sunlight.

The media is desperately trying to frame this as anything but wild corruption. ABC News called it an “unprecedented move for [the] president.” Talk about an understatement.

The Wall Street Journal swallowed every World Liberty lie whole, stenographing that the White House has totes said it doesn’t have any conflicts of interest. Sure, the bank is going to be run by Zach Witkoff, and sure Zach is the son of Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Middle East envoy, but no conflicts, not at all. The Journal also let Witkoff babble on about how World Liberty submitted “probably one of the most thoroughly reviewed applications in the history of the OCC.”

Yeah, show your work, buddy. Boasting that your application is nearly 1,000 pages doesn’t mean a thing if you won’t let anyone who isn’t a crony see the full application. Witkoff had some help holding that back, because Gould actually refused to share the unredacted version with the Democrats. Kinda gives the game away when the president’s appointee who is in charge of approving the president’s family business application to become a bank refuses to let anyone in the minority party see the full application of the president’s family business to become a bank. But hey, Gould said that, “We process applications in a fair and evenhanded manner.”

Oh, well. As long as you say so.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


No Deal: Why Trump's Negotiations With Iran Are So Unlikely To Succeed

No Deal: Why Trump's Negotiations With Iran Are So Unlikely To Succeed

With the Iran ceasefire scheduled to end in two days, Vice President JD Vance has returned to Islamabad with his sidekicks Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff to resume the abortive peace negotiations that have so far failed. While everyone should wish for success, we have little reason to anticipate news of anything more than an extended truce from the Pakistani capital. We must hope that if and when these talks fail, the president will refrain from his hideous plan to obliterate Iranian civilization and stand warned against such war crimes.

The outlook remains dim, however. Even if Donald Trump had actually written The Art of the Deal (he didn’t write a word of that bestseller, his first big fraud), it would be foolish to expect that the president or his hapless envoys can deliver a viable agreement with the Iranians anytime soon. Taken together, they lack all of the qualities required to achieve the complex diplomatic resolution required in this crisis – like the agreement that Trump so cavalierly discarded in 2017.

During the days after he first won the presidency, I consoled my distraught family with a prediction that Trump’s combination of arrogance, ignorance, impatience and incompetence would likely blunt his impulses to ruin the country and the world. That insight – based on many years of observing him in New York – proved accurate in many ways, but in this second term we’re seeing the downside of the president’s personal weaknesses, and those of the figures around him. Having gotten us into another bloody and very costly mess in the Middle East, neither he nor his underlings have a clue how to get us out of it.

The problem isn’t only that Trump and his team of morons neglected to fashion any plan for their sudden urge to attack a faraway country with a million men under arms, a big weapons arsenal, and a long history of ideological resilience. That was a historic and particularly stupid mistake, characteristic of Trump’s shallow intellect – but now, after inflicting massive damage on Iran, the world and our own economy, he and his government are evidently stuck in the quagmire they created.

The manifest incompetence that has so often hindered Trump, often to our great benefit, is now on full display as he flounders in attempting to secure a negotiated peace. He is unable to firmly decide what terms he is seeking, what is up for discussion, and even who will be doing the talking. He berated our European allies, went to war without building a coalition, then demanded their assistance to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and finally said that nobody needed their help. That childish pout is his usual approach to all global issues, but is even more wrong now.

As his predecessor Barack Obama understood when his State Department began work on the first Iran nuclear agreement, an international coalition was vital to success. So it would be now if only Trump had the wit and the will to build one.

What Obama also had that Trump disdains is an experienced team of negotiators. The idea that Steve Witkoff, his real estate crony and crypto corruption partner, or Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and nepo billionaire, possess any of the requisite knowledge or skills to achieve a peace agreement is simply ludicrous. The same goes for Vance, whose brief stint in the Senate qualifies him for nothing, let alone a sensitive diplomatic mission. The sight of this gang spending a “marathon” 21 hours in Islamabad and then departing in pique when the talks broke down demonstrated how naïve and foolish they were. The final stage of Obama’s nuclear deal went on for months.

Of course, we know that Trump lacks the capacity to stay with the process long enough to achieve a worthwhile outcome. The Iranians, as our friend Lucian Truscott IV observes today, no doubt believe they can just wait him out.

Finally, Trump lacks the integrity to conclude a lasting peace agreement. He has proved more than once to the Iranians that he is untrustworthy, after ordering the bombing attacks that actually killed not only their Supreme Leader but his negotiators as well. They know that to him, a treaty that they signed after years of intense bargaining, with the force of law in the United States, meant nothing. Neither did the honor of our country.

The only deal that Trump or any of these men can be expected to uphold is one that enriches them personally. That is the “art of the deal” that this president has been pursuing since the day he returned to the Oval Office.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World