Tag: susan collins
Liz Cheney

Are Women More Committed To Democracy And Fairness Than Men?

This is a generalization, I know. As Mark Twain is said to have said, "All generalizations are false, including this one." But there is growing evidence that women tend to be more protective of our American democracy than men. They are more willing to put their foot down when partisan schemers try to game the electoral system, mostly by changing the rules or gerrymandering.

A recent sign that women place more value on being a force for good comes out of conservative Utah. Both parties gerrymander, that is, draw voting district boundaries to give unfair advantage to their candidates. But a faith-based group called Mormon Women for Ethical Government wanted to stop that practice. In 2018, they backed Proposition 4, a ballot measure to create an independent districting commission that would prevent gerrymandering. It passed a statewide vote.

The backstory: Utah remains solidly Republican, but its capital, Salt Lake City, has become bluer in recent years. In 2021, the Republican-run legislature drew its own congressional map that split Salt Lake County to favor their party. The women sued.

It takes a certain inner steel to keep things honest when gaming the system might result in a preferred outcome. About 40 percent of the Mormon women's group are registered Republicans, and only 34 percent are Democrats. Their motivation is simply to maintain a level playing field.

"Gerrymandering breaks things," the group's co-executive director Emmy Petty Adams said. "It physically fractures communities. It breaks trust."

The matter has been in and out of courts, and the fight is not over. But because the Utah Supreme Court refused in February to block the new nonpartisan map, the 2026 election will be conducted under the new districts.

Defenders of democratic integrity understand that safeguarding free and fair elections is the best way to guarantee the public good. It's in their interest to ensure that their votes are properly counted.

It was hard to find a more conservative and politically brave House Republican than Wyoming's Liz Cheney. She voted to impeach President Donald Trump after the January 6, 2001 attack on the Capitol and did not flinch before the inevitable blowback. She was also one of only two Republicans to later serve on the House January 6 Select Committee, which investigated the violent rampage and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The other Republican was Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, a decorated combat veteran. Cheney ran for another term, undoubtedly knowing that she would lose the Republican primary to Trump's revenge pick. Kinzinger retired from the House.

"If I have to choose between maintaining a seat in the House of Representatives or protecting the constitutional republic," Cheney said shortly before the primary vote, "I'm going to choose the Constitution and the truth every single day."

Over in the Senate, Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski from Alaska voted to convict Trump for inciting an insurrection. Five Republican men did join them: Richard Burr, North Carolina; Bill Cassidy, Louisiana; Mitt Romney, Utah; Ben Sasse, Nebraska; and Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania.

It's important to note, however, that there were 42 male Republicans in the Senate compared with just eight female Republicans. Thus, the men voting for conviction represented only 12 percent of the male Republican caucus, while the two women represented a quarter of its female members. Four of the men subsequently retired. Cassidy remained in office, but come the primary, Trump punished him by endorsing Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA). She went on to become Louisiana's Republican Senate nominee. Cassidy gets credit for putting himself before the voters.

Of course, there are plenty of unprincipled women in politics. No need to list them here. The point is that women seem more invested in keeping politics honest, as a generalization, of course.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

Susan Collins

Trump's Canada Tariffs Endangering GOP Senate Seats In Maine And Kansas

President Donald Trump's ongoing battle with Canada is now starting to hurt Republican candidates with just 55 days until the November 3 election.

The Hill reported on Wednesday that Trump's ongoing trade war with Canada appears to be helping Democrats more than they hoped for by putting vulnerable Republican Senate candidates in yet another bind.

Trump's tariffs on Canada began on Tuesday, prompting several Republicans to speak out against Trump publicly. These exposed Republican are now being forced to defend Trump while his policy threatens jobs in their states.

For Republican Sen. Roger Marshall in Kansas, it was revealed Tuesday that his state could lose 1,200 jobs as Trump threatened to go after Canadian aircraft manufacturer Bombardier.

Marshall said he raised the issue with Trump while still endorsing the goal of bringing more manufacturing to Wichita. However, his statement drew criticism online and prompted CNN analysts to assert that vulnerable Republicans must now distance themselves from Trump’s trade war. Other Kansas Republicans, including GOP Sen. Jerry Moran, also urged Trump to offer exemptions, but commentators warned they'll still face voters’ anger over tariffs, rising costs and threatened jobs.

In Maine, Trump's decision is putting Republican Sen. Susan Collins in further political peril. Despite her loyal Trump voting record, she is now also trying to distance herself from his tariffs.

“There’s no one who has been more vocal than I have against Canadian tariffs,” she told reporters, according to The Hill. “I voted against them on the Senate floor months ago when the president was first proposing that there be tariffs."

She went on to say she spoke briefly to the Trump trade representative about the impact these decisions will have on Maine.

“Take something like road salt, we get all of our road salt from Canada,” said Collins. She went on to claim that Trump's tariffs could increase costs for some small towns by as much as $10,000 a year just for road salt. Maine’s close economic and cultural ties with Canada, including lumber, fisheries and tourism, make the trade war particularly politically sensitive.

Professor emerita of political science at the University of Maine, Amy Fried, told The Hill, “Maine and Canada have had very close relations over the years. There’s a lot of different ways in which the Maine and the Canadian economies have intersected. It affected the lumber industry, there have been fisheries issues, a lot of tourism back and forth.”

“A lot of Maine people feel an attachment to Canada and have benefited from those relationships, and Sen. Collins is trying to separate herself from it by saying she doesn’t approve of the tariffs, but Troy Jackson is also talking about it,” she added.

Meanwhile, Democrats are tying Collins to Trump's actions.

“Clearly, the economy in Maine is affected by tariffs,” Fried said. Indeed, Maine has a lot of Canadian tourism, to the tune of $500 million annually, according to the Portland Press Herald.

The state isn't the only one to face tourism problems. Just one month into Trump's second term, Canadian tourists began canceling trips to the U.S. Just after one year, U.S. businesses lost $4.5 billion in tourism just from Canadians.

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Collins Re-Election Bid Stumbles Over 'Oath Keeper' On Campaign Staff

Collins Re-Election Bid Stumbles Over 'Oath Keeper' On Campaign Staff

One of the most vulnerable Republicans in the current midterm cycle is seeing their reelection campaign crumble, as The Daily Beast reports that it has been beset by "one headache after another."

Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, is seeking reelection this year and is considered one of the GOP incumbents most susceptible to a Democratic flip. This comes after years of the lawmaker souring her reputation with voters by claiming frequently to be "concerned" about President Donald Trump's agenda, but still voting in support of it most of the time.

In a Wednesday report, The Daily Beast detailed the ways in which Collins' campaign "can’t catch a break." Even after heavy allegations forced her previous Democratic opponent to drop out of the race, a series of mounting political headaches has left her with anything but an easy path to victory.

"Instead, it’s been one headache after another," the report detailed. "Billionaire donors with ties to Jeffrey Epstein; a campaign begging supporters for gas money to fuel her re-election tour after she voted to uphold the conflict in Iran; and Donald Trump launching a trade war with neighboring Canada."

On the heels of all that "baggage," the report further detailed the latest scandal engulfing Collins: "a former Oath Keeper" found to be on her staff.

"In June, Collins, 73, announced county commissioner Wayne Erkkinen as her town chair in Greenville, which puts him in charge of grassroots campaigns and voter outreach as Collins fights to hold on to her Senate seat at November’s midterm elections," The Daily Beast explained. "The problem? Erkkinen, 81, was previously identified by the Anti-Defamation League as a member of the Oath Keepers, the far right extremist group that played a major role in the January 6 attack at the Capitol, with some later convicted of seditious conspiracy.

It continued: "The group’s leaked membership rolls included more than 38,000 names and Erkkinen was among them. He told [The Daily Beast] he joined the group in 2010 thinking it was for law enforcement and military veterans like him, who had sworn to defend the Constitution. He also said he quit the group 'years ago'—before the storming of the Capitol—because he didn’t want to be part of something violent."

“It wasn’t what I thought it would be,” Erkkinen said.

Collins' campaign has countered the issue, arguing that it "can’t be expected to keep tabs on every grassroots volunteer on its books," while the report noted that it has given her opponents "fresh ammunition to argue that the Senator is supported by Donald Trump’s 'most extreme backers.'" It also raises further alarms about "the company [her campaign] keeps," after reports emerged that it had accepted contributions from wealthy donors connected to Epstein.

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet


Dan Sullivan

Social Security Cuts? Republican Nominees Dancing On Political Third Rail

Nearly every Senate Republican facing a tough reelection fight this year has flirted with cutting Social Security, the federal program that keeps 58 million seniors out of poverty.

Polling suggests that cutting the program is deeply unpopular, which is why it is often referred to as “the third rail of electoral politics.” A recent AARP survey found that 82 percent of American adults view Social Security as “very important.” Half of those enrolled in the program say they would not survive financially if their benefits were cut.

The issue reemerged last year when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the White House’s tax-deferred investment accounts for newborns, known as “Trump accounts,” were a “backdoor for privatizing Social Security.” The accounts were part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), which passed the House and Senate with only Republican votes.

Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan celebrated OBBB’s passage and falsely claimed that the law “doesn’t touch Social Security.” The law will cut $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade to fund tax breaks that primarily benefit wealthy people. Those tax breaks will create less revenue for the Social Security trust fund, speeding up the program’s insolvency.

In 2014, when he was first running for the Senate, Sullivan suggested raising the retirement age and delaying Social Security benefits for future generations. He said “a younger generation of Alaskans or Americans can accept” such a change.

Sullivan is seeking a third term this year. His Democratic opponent is former Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola.

Florida Sen. Ashley Moody called OBBB “historic” when it passed and promised “this is just the beginning, and with President Donald Trump, we will not stop pushing forward.”

Moody was also a big fan of DOGE, the White House initiative that fired 14 percent of workers at the agency responsible for administering Social Security. This led to several Social Security field offices shutting down and longer wait times for those filing claims. Moody voted against multiple budget amendments to restore this funding.

More than five million of Moody’s constituents are enrolled in Social Security. She was appointed to the Senate last year to fill the seat vacated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. She is now running for a full term against Democratic state Rep. Angie Nixon.

Like Moody, Ohio Sen. Jon Husted also voted for OBBB and against reversing DOGE cuts. He then went a step further by proposing a constitutional amendment that would compel Congress to balance the federal budget.

Currently, Social Security is mostly funded through payroll taxes. Those funds are held by the U.S. Treasury and disbursed to beneficiaries. Any surplus funds are invested in special Treasury bonds that are drawn on when tax revenues fall short.

A balanced-budget amendment would essentially make it illegal for the federal government to spend more in a given year than it collects in revenue. If tax revenues are insufficient to fund Social Security, the government would be prohibited from drawing on the bonds to make up the shortfall. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says this would inevitably lead to a cut in services.

The AARP says such a plan would be “devastating for millions.”

Husted will face former Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown in this year’s election. Brown co-sponsored the 2024 Social Security Fairness Act that increased benefits for public workers.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins did not vote for OBBB, but she did vote to allow the legislation to be debated, clearing a key procedural hurdle and setting the stage for its eventual passage. North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven said Collins was a “team player” for doing so.

Collins has cast multiple votes weakening Social Security in her 29-year career, including a 2003 vote against creating a Social Security reserve account and a 2011 vote against tabling a budget bill that proposed cutting the program.

Collins is running for reelection this year against Democratic state Sen. Troy Jackson.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) plans to make Republican hostility toward Social Security a major issue in the midterms.

“In November, voters will reject Republicans’ attempts to put this critical program on the chopping block by electing a Democratic Senate majority that will stand up for seniors and protect Social Security,” says DSCC spokesperson Maeve Coyle.

Reprinted with permission from American Journal News

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World