Tag: west point
Why War To Impose Regime Change On Iran Will Bring 'A World Of Hurt'

Why War To Impose Regime Change On Iran Will Bring 'A World Of Hurt'

At West Point, that’s what we used to call getting into a situation that was way over your head. It meant there was practically no way you were going to get out of the trouble you were in. No matter which way you turned or what you did, punishment and humiliation beckoned.

It’s what the United States found itself in the day in March of 1965 that Lyndon Johnson ordered the Third Marine Division into Vietnam. It’s where we were headed a few months later in July when Johnson increased our commitment of troops to 125,000 and doubled the monthly draft call-up to 1,000 young men per month. In that same month of March, Johnson ordered Operation Rolling Thunder, the carpet-bombing of “Communist strongholds” in South Vietnam.

A year later, our military presence in Vietnam was 385,000, and Secretary of Defense McNamara had initiated Project 100,000, recruiting and drafting soldiers who were below previous mental, medical, and behavior standards to meet new manpower goals demanded by the war.

Within two years of starting the war in Vietnam, we were in a world of hurt.

Seven years later, the United States military would go down to defeat by North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces. Two years after that, the last helicopter would lift off the U.S. embassy in Saigon, and our military presence in that country would end completely.

On March 20, 2003, another U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, would oversee the invasion of Iraq. The initial air attack on Iraqi forces and military and political headquarters in Baghdad, dubbed “Shock and Awe,” was said to have succeeded spectacularly. Three weeks later, Rumsfeld would announce that U.S. forces had “taken Baghdad.” The war that was planned as a lightning strike to topple Saddam Hussein and “bring democracy to the Middle East” had worked!

But the thing about wars like those in Vietnam and Iraq is that the other side gets a say. In Iraq, Rumsfeld tried to avoid the fact that Iraqis were fighting back, even going so far as to ban the use of the word “insurgency” by the so-called Coalition Provisional Authority, the makeshift operation that had been established to administer the defeated country of Iraq.

Four years later, on January 10, 2007, President Bush announced a “surge” of 21,000 new American combat troops into Iraq to deal with Rumsfeld’s forbidden word, the insurgency that had arisen and was leading to the deaths of American soldiers every day.

About two years later, on December 4, 2008, the U.S. agreed with a new Iraqi government that U.S. forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by the middle of 2009 and be gone from the country altogether by the end of 20ll. By June of 2009, 38 U.S. military bases had been turned over to the Iraqi government and U.S. forces had withdrawn from Baghdad. In the Vietnam war, withdrawal of U.S. forces from combat was called “Vietnamization.” In Iraq, it was called a “Status of Forces Agreement.”

More than 58,000 American soldiers were killed in Vietnam. In Iraq, more than 4,000 members of the U.S. military were killed. Tens of thousands were wounded in Iraq. Hundreds of thousands were wounded in Vietnam.

In both countries, the United States had found itself in a world of hurt and withdrew with America’s tail between American legs.

Is it possible to learn from the past, from mistakes made by previous administrations and by previous Congresses that approved the trillions spent for, well…for nothing?

That is the question we face today all over again, as Donald Trump gets to turn the White House Situation Room into his personal playground and plan his way into another American misadventure, this time in the country of Iran.

Here are some handy facts and figures that I can guarantee are not being discussed down there in that Situation Room.

Vietnam in 1965 had a population of 38 million. In 1966, the country we said we were defending from Communism had a landmass of 66,000 square miles. There are no specific figures for Vietnam’s GDP in 1965, but by 1984, Vietnam’s GDP was only $18 billion, with a per capita GDP somewhere between $200 and $300. These figures of course suggest that Vietnam’s GDP twenty years earlier when we invaded was significantly lower.

In 2003, the population of Iraq was 27 million, and its landmass was 170,000 square miles. Iraq’s GDP that year was $22 billion. Its per capita GDP was only $818.

Those are figures for the years the great, big, powerful United States of America decided to invade those two countries.

Now let’s have a look at Iran in 2025. Iran is approximately four times the size of Iraq, with a territory of 636,000 square miles. Its population is 92.5 million, approximately three times the size of Iraq’s population the year we launched our invasion in 2003. Iran’s GDP is $1.75 trillion, about three-fourths the size of Russia’s GDP. Iran’s per capita GDP is $20,000, larger than Russia’s per capita GDP of $14,000.

All these figures indicate the relative strengths of countries to fight back against an invasion like one by the almighty United States. Iraq, when we invaded, was far weaker than the Iran of today. And that goes double or triple for the poor agrarian country of Vietnam in 1965 when an American president thought defeating Communism in that country would be easy.

So that’s who Donald Trump and his Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, are thinking about going to war with. Oh, wait a minute! I’m sorry! It’s all over the news tonight that Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are not in Trump’s “inner circle” of advisors, as he prepares for whatever he’s planning on doing as soon as this weekend.

That is when the U.S. will launch a massive air assault on Iran, according to a report by Seymour Hersh tonight. There will be “heavy American bombing,” according to what key U.S. and Israeli sources Hersh has “relied upon for decades.” Hersh is the author of “The Samson Option,” the authoritative 1991 book about how Israel built its nuclear arsenal and “America’s willingness to keep the project secret,” so it is apparent that Hersh’s sources in both Israel and the U.S. defense establishment are good ones.

Hersh has written a piece titled “What I have been told is coming in Iran,” on his Substack. Hersh reports that Trump has “signed off on an all-out bombing campaign,” but it won’t happen until this weekend because “the president wants the shock of the bombing to be diminished as much as possible by the opening of Wall Street trading on Monday.”

Does that sound like Donald Trump, or what? The timing of an “all out” attack on the most populous nation with the most powerful military in the Middle East will be timed not on tactical considerations, but on the fucking stock market.

Hersh reminds us that there are more than two dozen U.S. air force bases and navy ports in the Middle East which are no doubt being prepared right now for Iranian retaliatory strikes. Already, military dependents have been flown out of bases like the ones in Qatar and Kuwait. All the air forces bases in the region contain pre-positioned military “assets,” as they are called, that can be used in the air assault on Iran.

Hersh reports that the U.S. will strike “the bases of the Republican Guards,” the elite Iranian military force which protects Iran’s political and religious leadership. Trump killed General Qasem Soleimani, one of the top leaders in Iraq’s Revolutionary Guards in a drone strike on a vehicle carrying him at the Baghdad Airport in 2020.

Hersh reports that there is some confusion about Trump’s intentions if Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei “departs.” Hersh reports that he was “told that his [Khamenei’s] personal plane left Tehran airport headed for Oman early Wednesday morning, accompanied by two fighter planes, but it is not known whether he was aboard.” Trump has demanded that Khamenei agree to an “unconditional surrender.” We are not at war with Iran, at least not on this day, Thursday, two days before the weekend that Hersh says the U.S. intends to launch a massive air strike on Iran, so it is unclear who Khamenei would “surrender” to and why.

If Khamenei has “departed,” it would seem unclear if Trump’s plans for a massive air attack on Iran will go forward. But the plans for dropping the famed “bunker buster” bomb on Iran’s key nuclear facility at Fordow seem to be very much alive, and Hersh quotes another “informed official” saying of the plans for the American attack, “This is a chance to do away with this regime once and for all, and so we might as well go big."

Hersh compares what might happen in Iran to Libya in 2011 after “western intervention,” when Gaddafi was killed and the country descended into chaos. As he ominously puts it, “The futures of Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon, all victims of repeated outside attacks, are far from settled,” indicating that an American assault on Iran that takes out its political and religious leadership might plunge a huge portion of the Middle East into chaos.

“Donald Trump clearly wants an international win he can market,” Hersh concludes.

That’s what Lyndon Johnson was hoping for in 1965. It’s what George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld thought they were getting when they ordered the invasion of Iraq in 2003. A big air campaign and a quick win.

This is me remembering our history with invading much smaller countries with our huge military might:

We’re headed into another world of hurt.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

White House

Fascism's Follies: Trump Create Crisis At West Point

There is a crisis at West Point. This one is not self-invented, as other crises at the have been previously, but rather invented at the White House by Donald Trump.

The crisis is familiar. Trump has ordered that all “quotas, objectives, and goals” in admissions, promotions and career fields be ended at the service academies, that teaching things called “gender ideology,” “critical race theory,” and “DEI,” (presumably as an academic subject that no one has ever heard of) be ended forthwith, and that “lethal force be promoted” by teaching that “our founding documents remain the most powerful force for human good in history.”

This has caused something of a panic at the academy. They’re tossing out history courses on “Topics in Gender History” and “Race, Ethnicity, Nation,” according to an op-ed in the New York Times written by Graham Parsons, a tenured professor of philosophy at West Point who is resigning from the faculty at the end of the term in protest against the changes forced on the academy by Trump’s gender and race warriors at the Pentagon and White House.

“West Point seems to believe that by submitting to the Trump administration, it can save itself in the long run,” Parsons opined in the Times, writing without permission or having submitted his manuscript for clearance by the academy leadership.

I am something of an expert about change at West Point. Change comes slowly to the 250-plus year old academy, but it has happened. And each time significant changes have occurred at West Point, military leadership and academy alumni have been convinced that it would lead to the end of West Point’s history of providing the nation with Army leaders of merit and honor.

This is not the first time academic change has happened at West Point. Prior to 1985, the academy had no program of “majors.” Every cadet graduated with a bachelor of science with heavy emphasis on applied mathematics, engineering, and military leadership. When the academy began offering a program of 45 majors, allowing graduates to go into graduate programs in law, medicine, computer technology and other subjects in addition to their regular service in the combat and support arms, you’d have thought the earth had shifted and West Point had begun to crumble into the Hudson. No more four years of calculus crammed into just two? No requirement to study ordnance engineering, the science of weapons? My God! What was the world coming to?

But by the time the majors program arrived at West Point, the academy had already endured two of its greatest earthquakes: the admission a Black cadet in the late 1800’s, and the arrival of women when the U.S. military was integrated by gender in 1976. The military academies also endured another major change. In the early 1970’s, compulsory attendance at church was ended with an 8-0 Supreme Court decision refusing to even hear the government’s appeal of a lower court decision. Along with three of my classmates, I played a role in the cessation of this clearly unconstitutional practice by filing complaints with the Secretary of the Army that exhausted administrative remedies, allowing a federal lawsuit to be filed after we graduated. At the time, we were told that if “mandatory chapel” was ended, it would lead to the end of West Point itself.

In 2011, the end of “don’t ask, don’t tell” allowed the admission of gay and lesbian cadets and for them to serve openly at the academy. This was yet another revolution that for decades Pentagon and academy leadership thought would lead to the collapse of “good order and discipline” and a reduction in the combat effectiveness and readiness of West Point graduates.

It goes without saying that none of the aforementioned earthquakes led to the collapse of West Point or the other service academies. In fact, they have thrived, with applications for admission higher than they have ever been.

In fact, I would make the argument that West Point is better in every way since the admission of Blacks, women, and gays and lesbians. It hardly bears saying that neither the army nor any of the other uniformed services is comprised solely of white males. We would not have a fighting force to defend the nation without the honorable service of a diverse population of volunteers who fill the ranks of enlisted soldiers, non-commissioned officers, and the officer corps.

What Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are trying to do at West Point and the other service academies is fascistic folly. The Naval Academy, responding to Trump’s executive order on DEI and gender, removed more than 300 books from the academy library. The town of Annapolis, which surrounds the academy, responded by making all the banned books readily available in the town library and its bookstores.

The removal of certain topics of study from the curriculum at West Point is not going to materially affect cadets who undergo extensive training apart from the classroom, both at the academy and during summers spent training with real-world army units in the field. A cadet spending his or her summer training in a unit with a female company commander or a Black platoon leader – or both – is worth a half dozen books on gender studies or critical race theory. The same is true at West Point itself. The academy has had multiple women and Blacks who have served as “First Captain,” the highest-ranking cadet. West Point has had a female Commandant of Cadets, the brigadier general in charge of the Corps of Cadets, and a Black lieutenant general who has served as Superintendent of Cadets, the academy’s highest-ranking officer.

Diversity in the academy’s leadership and in the leadership of the corps of cadets will not end just because Donald Trump signed an executive order, nor will the diversity of the army itself. About 11 percent of soldiers are Black; about 17 percent of soldiers are women. I don’t know the percentage of the army who are gay or lesbian, but I can tell you that the great majority of my class of 800 had no idea that about 25 of our classmates were gay, back in the time when the closet was not a choice but a necessity for gay people in both military and civilian life.

Donald Trump can sign all the executive orders he wants, and Pete Hegseth can thunder about DEI and “wokeism” until he goes hoarse, but they are not going to change the facts on the ground either at West Point or in the Army at large. Women and Blacks and gays and lesbians are not going to be erased by fascist edicts, and by the way, neither are transgender service members, who I guarantee you will find ways to wait out the current nightmare of executive orders that can attempt to cancel their service, but will never bring to any sort of end who they are and their desire to serve their country. Even if some are forced out of the service, they will be back when Trump’s executive orders are inevitably reversed.

West Point has been there on the Hudson since Thomas Jefferson founded the it in 1802 as the nation’s first service academy. It’s not going away. The passion and patriotism of young men and women of all races and sexual persuasions and sexual identities will overpower this authoritarian hiccup in our history. Fifty-six years after I graduated from West Point, I know this as well as I know my own name.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. He writes every day at luciantruscott.substack.com and you can follow him on Bluesky @lktiv.bsky.social and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

Now The Trump Gang Is Coming After West Point

Now The Trump Gang Is Coming After West Point

I have always been proud of having graduated from West Point. My family has a long connection to the Academy: my father graduated in 1945; my maternal grandfather, Bartley M. Harloe, graduated in 1918; my sixth great grandfather, Thomas Jefferson, founded the Academy in 1802; and most of all, I am proud of having played a role, along with three of my classmates, in ending the 150-year-old regulation which made mandatory for cadets to attend the weekly services of one of the three approved faiths -- Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish. No others were permitted.

At that time, failure to attend religious services was punishable by walking back and forth outside for hours with a rifle on your shoulder in the heat and freezing cold and confinement to barracks for months on end. Refusal led to a Superintendent's Board and expulsion from the Academy.

Like many institutions as old as West Point, the Academy has had many flaws, compulsory attendance at church being only one of them. Racism and antisemitism have infected West Point since its founding. During my father's time, Jewish cadets were assigned rooms by themselves, and they were “silenced” by other cadets, including their classmates, refusing to speak to them. Jewish plebes, first year cadets, were sometimes required by upperclassmen to run up and down stairs wearing their winter uniform and overcoat carrying their rifle at what was called “high port” over their heads until they dropped from heat exhaustion.

Racism was similarly rampant at West Point. The Academy did not have a Black graduate until 75 years after its founding in 1877, when Henry O. Flipper became the first African American to graduate. Flipper was silenced by other cadets and forced to live in a room by himself in the barracks and to eat by himself at a table in the mess hall throughout his four years at West Point.

There were only two other black graduates before 1936, when Benjamin O. Davis became the first Black graduate since 1889 and went on to be the first black general in the Air Force. He underwent the same brutal racist treatment that Flipper had endured -- made to eat alone at a table in the mess hall and room by himself in the barracks, silenced by most of the Corps of Cadets.

By the time I graduated, things had improved at West Point, but only marginally. I had eight Black classmates when I graduated in 1969, amounting to one percent of my class. Racism, while no longer officially endorsed by the Academy, nevertheless endured. One of my Black classmates, a star on the football team, was approached by another cadet in his company on the day Martin Luther King was assassinated in 1968. The cadet, who was white and one of our classmates, put his hand on my Black classmate’s shoulder and grinning widely said, “Well, we finally got him.”

By the time that women were first admitted to West Point in 1976, racism, while not a thing of the past, had begun to be dealt with. There were 80 black cadets in the class of 1973, for example. But the entrance of women into the previously all-male bastion of West Point disrupted the place in ways that the Academy is still dealing with. Most if not all the women in the early classes after they were admitted to West Point were sexually assaulted or raped, and sexual assaults continued for years afterward.

Racism and misogyny have persisted at the Academy. Simone Askew, the first black woman to be chosen as the top ranked cadet at West Point in 2017, wrote this about her experience as a cadet:

“It was just two weeks after I had been selected for the role of First Captain of West Point, becoming the first black woman to hold that position. It was late, and I was headed to my room. There waiting for me was a small, white note, inserted underneath my door. I opened the folded page, which bore no signature. Inside was a picture of me holding a rifle, photoshopped with a monkey's face over my own.

Though I was aware of the historical precedence of portraying black people as monkeys, I wondered if the depiction suggested something deeper about my leadership. Racing through my mind were all the presentations and conversations that I had given in the past 14 days as First Captain and whether I had made any mistakes. This self-interrogation fueled in me a paralyzing fear.

I feared if others knew how deeply such an image impacted me that I would be told -- as black cadets and officers are often told -- that this was not the first nor would it be the last time that I would experience racism, so I had better get used to it. Even worse, they would deem me as too emotional, dramatic, self-centered, weak, and ‘always making it about race.’ My strategy, instead, was to perform flawlessly. After receiving a Rhodes Scholarship, I was optimistic that I had finally done enough. My efforts, at last, would prove my humanity to the anonymous artist -- and to the entire Corps of Cadets.

However, more racist caricatures and comments continued to circulate online. One of the popular images even depicted me as Satan himself.

Am I an animal, am I a demon, or am I human?”

The document from which this statement is excerpted is a policy proposal suggesting ways that West Point might deal with the racism that persists even today. It was authored by nine graduates of the classes of 2018 and 2019 including two former cadet First Captains, two valedictorians, two Fulbright Scholars, and a Marshall Scholar, all of whom held positions of senior leadership and responsibility while they were cadets.

The proposal contains numerous suggestions for programs and classes that would, if adopted, put in practice at West Point the right wing’s boogeymen-du-jour: diversity, equity, and inclusion. I think I can safely say that if this laudable document ever came to the attention of Elon Musk and his cronies, heads would explode.

The estimable Judd Legum reported today in his “Popular Information” Substack on how the wholesale attack on DEI in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has led to the “digital and physical destruction of 18 publications on workplace safety practices. Almost all of the publications are not associated with DEIA topics but appear to have been targeted because they include a DEIA-related keyword used in a completely different context.”

In one example cited by Legum, a document entitled OSHA Best Practices for Protecting EMS Responders During Treatment and Transport of Victims of Hazardous Substance Releases, the words “diverse” and “diversity” are used to describe not race or gender but rather certification and training requirements for EMS workers and how their training might keep them safe on the job.

I include this off-topic report as an example of the broad-brush approach being applied to the government-wide attack by the Trump administration on anything that might smack of promoting sane practices to deal with racism and sexism and even discrimination against the disabled in the workplace.

As I have previously reported, the Academy's panic over Trump's obsession with DEI recently led to the closure of several cadet extracurricular clubs for groups of women and minorities including the National Society of Black Engineers Club, the Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers, and the Vietnamese American Cadet Association. A friend with sources among the Academy's staff and faculty told me today that some of the clubs may be allowed to return because West Point determined that the clubs had nothing to do with the DEI office, programs, or policies. The clubs were of course just groups of cadets with similar backgrounds who wanted to get together and have fun.

The assault by the right wing on West Point and the other service academies is far from over, however. Our newly inaugurated Vice President, JD Vance, who made such a fool of himself on the world stage last week at the Munich Security Conference, when he told NATO member nations that Donald Trump will be taking the side of Russia in negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, has questioned why the United States even needs West Point or the Naval Academy or the Air Force Academy or the Coast Guard Academy. Vance and the rest of the Republican right-wing were horrified and outraged when the Supreme Court specifically exempted the service academies from its decision ending affirmative action on college campuses.

Trump and his hand puppet secretary of defense have accused the Pentagon of being filled with so-called “woke” generals and senior civil servants who amount to what they describe as a Marxist underground within the military establishment. They have even accused one of the several secretaries of defense appointed by Trump in his first administration of being a woke radical. That would be Mark Esper, a West Point graduate from the class of 1986, who they apparently believe was subjected to woke ideological pollution because his was among the first classes with female graduates. Oh, the horror that human beings of the opposite sex might take the place of the young men who had traditionally enjoyed the exclusive privilege of a West Point education!

It's hard to put into words how bad things are with Trump using the utterly bogus excuse of DEI to turn back the clock to an earlier time when white men had most of the money and all the power.

So, I'll reach back to a megalomaniac from an earlier time to put today's DEI panic in context. During my senior year when I and three of my classmates were attempting to overturn the requirement that cadets attend church every Sunday, West Point's deputy commandant singled me out as the ringleader and ordered me to get the others to cease and desist. He did this by making me come to his office every afternoon at exactly 5:05 PM for a daily lecture and verbal drubbing.

For several weeks, I would report to his office, and he would try to convince me how wrong we were and why we should withdraw our formal complaints. When I countered with our arguments about the obvious unconstitutionality of the regulation, he would leap out of his chair and come around his desk screaming at me at the top of his lungs.

He labeled me -- see if this doesn't sound familiar -- as a Communist and a Marxist and so radical that I was, in his memorable phrase, “beyond Mao.” Fed up, I replied, “Sir, you mean first is Marx, and then Lenin, and then Mao, and then Truscott?” Red-faced, his body shaking, he sputtered, “D-d-don’t you know what's going on here, you little shit?” Playing dumb and wanting to hear him answer his own question, I told him I had no idea.

“If you succeed at ending mandatory chapel, the next thing that will happen is that we'll have women in here, and then we won't have West Point anymore. All this place will be is a goddamn college.”

The name of the man who made that rather prescient prediction in October of 1968 was Alexander M. Haig, later to become Nixon’s chief of staff, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe and secretary of state.

Eight years later, the first class with women was admitted to West Point. The issue of gays in the military wasn’t on the horizon yet, and DEI didn’t even exist, but the dread threat of white men losing their grip on power had breached the sacred ramparts of West Point. Power is what the whole thing has always been about, and those with power have been crazed about holding onto it ever since.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter. Please consider subscribing.

Pete Hegseth

How Far Will Trump Appointees Push Their Hatred? No Limit

Just overnight I got a dozen posts in my newsfeed and in my email inbox suggesting that I shouldn't be doom scrolling through the horror show in Washington. But how do you avert your eyes from Donald Trump announcing he wants to takeover the Gaza Strip and dislocate all the Palestinians in Gaza by moving them into “beautiful” housing developments in nearby Arab states, and meanwhile back in this beleaguered country, Elon Musk and his tech minnows are swimming amok through our government?

Last night it became known that the CIA, under White House orders, sent an unclassified memo via regular email to the White House listing at least 2000 of its most recent hires naming them using people's first names and last initials. Intelligence experts interviewed on cable news last night said this is like handing over part of the CIA phone book to Moscow and China, because public email is so insecure.

But that's just one bad dream the nation suffered overnight. There was video coverage all day of ICE raiders continuing their rampage across the country arresting and detaining undocumented migrants, as many as 1000 to 1200 a day. This morning it was announced that the Department of Justice is suing the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois over their sanctuary policies.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that Elon Musk’s tech mice, as part of their romp through the Treasury tried to shut down USAID payments all over the world. This included payments that support the PEPFAR program that distributes aid to governments and clinics in Africa that are fighting AIDS and HIV. A portion of the funds from USAID goes to support programs that treat pregnant women in Africa so that their babies are not born with AIDS. One of Trump's first executive orders ordered the shutdown of all foreign aid payments by the United States government around the entire world.

What this means when you get down in the weeds is that programs like PEPFAR and programs to feed hungry children in Sudan are going without money, and people and babies are dying. Meanwhile, the MAGA faithful cheer him on.

In this country, the new brutal strain of the flu from which you are apparently not protected by the new flu shot has killed 8,300 people during this flu season, and hospitalizations as of last week stand at 190,000 according to the CDC. That's amazing in and of itself isn't it, that the CDC is still functioning and still keeping records and still reporting the terrible things that are going on with threats to American health? It makes you wonder how much longer that's going to happen as the Senate vote to confirm RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services gets closer.

Out on the farms of America's South and Midwest, chickens are dying by the millions from bird flu, knocking out entire flocks and shutting down chicken farms for months so that chicken houses and processing plants can be disinfected. The spread of bird flu has egg prices in the supermarket over $5 a dozen, and they are $9 a dozen in California already.

Musk and his utterly illegal minions have been creating chaos in the Treasury Department for nearly two weeks and they've gotten into the highly secret Treasury payment system that contains the private records of the Social Security and tax systems, not to mention Medicare records and other private data. Do you remember how secret Donald Trump's tax records were? He refused to release his taxes when he ran in 2016 and 2020 and 2024 with the utterly spurious excuse that he was being audited.

Well, I'm sure Trump's records are still secret, but we learned this morning that Musk’s tech teenagers have been feeding highly sensitive records into an insecure artificial intelligence system accessed through the Microsoft cloud to “analyze” data for waste and fraud. I think we can assume that privacy rights have been cancelled for everyone who is not an oligarch and a signed-on-the-dotted-line Trump loyalist.

While the rest of this madness has been happening at warp speed in nearly every department of our government, the Trump administration announced that they will be opening a razor wire-topped Club Med to house 30,000 deportees at Guantanamo. Some sort of shady deal involving cash payments has been worked out between our new alleged Secretary of State, the cretinous Marco Rubio, and the corrupt president of El Salvador, so that we can create space in our prison system by sending violent convicted felons who are American citizens, to be held in Salvadoran prisons.

This is of course unprecedented -- deporting American citizens to prisons in a foreign country -- but then, is there anything that has been done by Trump and Co-President Musk over the past two weeks that has not been both illegal and unprecedented?

All of this began on the night of Trump's inauguration when he made a big show of signing his executive order banning DEI throughout the government. What is this virulent hatred that Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans have for programs that promote diversity, equality, and inclusion, you might ask. Well, it didn't just appear out of thin air like a hologrammatic right wing boogeyman.

No, the demonization of DEI began in the feverish brain pan of Christopher Rufo, he of the Manhattan Institute who got his start toiling in the vineyards of the Heritage Foundation, the Claremont Institute, and the Discovery Institute, a little known Christian think tank that has long championed the teaching of so-called “intelligent design,” a bogus fundamentalist anti-evolution “scientific theory” based on biblical scripture.

Rufo was almost single handedly the author of the anti-critical race theory panic that gripped the right wing around 2020 when Rufo discovered to his horror that the city of Seattle was conducting anti-racism seminars based on the theories of Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DeAngelo, whom Rufo quickly branded as Marxist radicals. When Donald Trump got a whiff of the controversy around critical race theory that was bubbling out of the right-wing fever swamp, he invited Rufo to Washington to pitch his ideas to Trump's reelection team. Before he knew it, Trump had signed an executive order banning racial and sexual stereotyping by the federal government.

“‘Critical race theory’ is the perfect villain,” Rufo wrote in a political treatise published by the Manhattan Institute. In 2024, Rufo found himself at Mar-a-Lago surrounded by Trump's MAGA minions, this time pitching his new anti- DEI messaging plan, and they were off. It became a theme of the Trump campaign and then it became a promise, that he would “end DEI in America on day one.”

Democrats failed to come up with a rationale defending something that should have been part of their playbook, and Trump rode the anti-DEI mania he had whipped up into the White House.

But what is DEI exactly? Linda Hopper, a friend of ours from Washington D.C. who has spent her lifetime working in human resources wrote me recently lamenting the way that Republicans have been able to demonize programs that simply try to “ensure people in the workplace are treated with dignity and respect.” DEI isn’t understood by what she calls “the rightie tighties” as anything more than initials that stand for values they're against.

“Diversity training programs pissed off white men because their values were questioned especially about women and Black and Brown people,” according to my friend the HR veteran. The truth is, the DEI “dragon they're trying to slay is basically what we were taught in vacation Bible School…value each other; red and yellow black and white all are precious in His sight; be polite; seek to understand first and be kind to others.”

I'll take Linda Hopper’s definition of DEI any day over the bull crap being pushed by Trump and Vance and Hegseth and the rest of the little boys now running our government who are too frightened to look at the world with soft eyes and listen to others with open ears.

What the MAGA obsession with DEI really represents is a covert plan to turn back the clock to segregation and sexism. If you want evidence, you need look no further than to what West Point has just done. A memo was issued on Tuesday signed by Deputy Commandant Chad Foster ordering that a dozen cadet clubs be closed and “cease all activities.”

Among the clubs ordered closed are the Latin Cultural Club, the National Society of Black Engineers Club, the Spectrum Club which was organized by L.G.B.T.Q. cadets, the Society of Women Engineers Club, and the Corbin Forum, a club that was founded in 1976, the year that women were first admitted to West Point, and the Vietnamese-American Cadet Association.

Let me explain to you about cadet clubs at West Point, a subject about which I know a few things, having been a founder of what we called the “Culture Club” as a cadet. Most clubs are organized by cadets to have fun. Because it's the Military Academy, they have to have officer sponsors and certification by the Academy and they have to follow certain rules, but basically it's cadets wanting to get together during their time off and shoot the shit and complain about the tactical department and lament the fact that they've got so little leave time and none or few of the privileges enjoyed by regular college students. So, they form clubs and have meetings and lunches and they go on trips that are marginally connected to their stated purpose but are really just to get off the post at West Point and put on some civilian clothes and relax and maybe even do some extracurricular stuff with others of the same or opposite sex.

Got that? It's young people being young people, and now for the young people at West Point who have brown skin or black skin or are gay or female, that simple urge to get together in a club and be who they are is illegal.

Pete “take a look at all my white supremacist tattoos” Hegseth, in one of his first acts as Secretary of Defense, ordered that the Pentagon and the United States military would no longer celebrate what he called “identity months,” such as Pride Month, celebrating gay pride, and Black History Month.

There you go folks. That's how far they'll take their hatred of DEI. That's how afraid they are, how disdainful they are, and how little respect or just plain human feeling they have for anyone who is not a straight white male.

If they're shutting down cadet clubs at West Point, how long will it be before civilian colleges receive memos from the Trump government threatening to cancel their federal grants and loans and money for research if they don't shut down their clubs that are associated with minorities and women?

What will be next? Programs to feed hungry kids; anything that smacks of helping or being kind to the homeless; providing shelter to the unhoused -- the next thing you know, billionaires Donald Trump and Elon Musk will go after the law that requires emergency rooms to treat people in distress whether or not they have health insurance.

First they came for the immigrants.

Then they came for the foreign aid.

Then they came for the clean air and water.

Then they came for the schools.

Then they came for the sick and the elderly.

They'll come for the children next, and it won't end unless we can stop them.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World