The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Nathan Sproul — whose Strategic Allied Consulting was finally fired Thursday by the Republican National Committee — is well known in Republican circles for his voter registration “efforts.”

The former executive director of the Arizona Republican Party ran voter registration drives on behalf of the RNC in 2004 in eight states, reportedly collecting over eight million dollars in payments for his services. During that campaign, his firm was accused of having his employees destroy registration forms in Nevada and California along with other “hijinks,” including posing as a progressive organization and spearheading a drive to get Ralph Nader on the ballot. In Minnesota, Sproul’s company allegedly fired employees who brought back Democratic registrations.

Though Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VA) and Ted Kennedy (D-MA) sent a letter in 2004 requesting an investigation into Sproul’s efforts by the Department of Justice, it never happened. And Sproul was invited to the White House for the Bush Christmas party in 2006.

In 2008, as John McCain’s campaign was making allegations against ACORN of committing widespread voter registration fraud, they hired Sproul for “voter registration.” Congressman Chris Cannon (R-UT) defended the hire by saying, “The difference between ACORN and Sproul is that ACORN doesn’t throw away or change registration documents after they have been filled out.” In fact, Sproul’s company had been accused of doing just that.

The RNC was well aware of the charges against Sproul when they hired him in 2012 to create Strategic Allied Consulting in order to register voters in several swing states. After Palm Beach County Elections Supervisor Susan Bucher flagged 106 “questionable” registration applications, it seems Sproul’s company has been caught doing what they have long been accused of — voter registration fraud.

Fox News and the conservative media hounded ACORN in 2009 for similar allegations, leading the non-partisan group to close down in 2010. You’d expect they’d be all over news of actual registration fraud, especially as the allegations spread include nine counties in Florida as well as registration drives in Colorado and North Carolina — if only they didn’t involve a Republican.

The charges against Sproul are much more serious than the few voter registration fraud cases brought against ACORN employees. Brad Friedman at Brad Blog summarizes:

Of course, there is no real comparison to ACORN. Unlike Sproul’s outfits, the non-partisan community organizing group was never hired by the Democratic Party to do voter registration work. Moreover, it was ACORN themselves who discovered fraud by a handful of its more than ten thousand workers and notified officials of the fraud and the names of those who had defrauded them.

Sproul has been hired again and again by the Republican Party without any sense that they took the accusations against him seriously.

Republicans continually invoke ACORN to make registering and voting much more difficult. The Nation‘s Ari Berman suggests that based on these allegations, “Maybe in 2013 the Florida legislature should pass legislation specially preventing Republicans from running voter registration drives.”

The GOP has begun waging a war on voting. But if they cared about the integrity of the vote, they wouldn’t hire operatives like Nathan Sproul, who have a history of disregarding it.

Photo credit: AP Photo/J Pat Carter, File


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump and Melania Trump

Youtube Screenshot

In a Monday court filing, the Justice Department asked a federal court not to unseal the affidavit showing probable cause for the warrant to search Mar-a-Lago, giving reasons that underscore the hot water Donald Trump appears to be in.

Disclosing the affidavit now would, according to the filing, “cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation.” It would do that by revealing, “among other critically important and detailed investigative facts: highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government; specific investigative techniques; and information required by law to be kept under seal.”

Keep reading... Show less

Lara Trump

Youtube Screenshot

When Donald Trump revealed last Monday night that the FBI had “raided” his Mar-a-Lago resort and residence, Fox News had an asset on its payroll uniquely positioned to provide its audience with insight: The former president’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, is a Fox contributor. But unfortunately for the network’s viewers, over the past week she's been using her network platform to mislead them.

Members of the Trump orbit, including Lara Trump’s husband, Eric, deployed to Fox last week offering the expected furious defenses of the former president and denunciations of the FBI’s probe. But if there’s any value whatsoever in putting a former president’s relative on staff, surely it is in the aftermath of such an event, when she might have both rare access to credible information and a willingness to reveal it.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}