The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

A day after an international team of scientists issued a dire warning about the severe and deadly consequences the world will soon face if action is not taken immediately to slow the rate of climate change, Trump finally responded. Well, sort of.

Trump didn’t say whether he accepts the findings from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which warned that the world has only about 12 years to dramatically cut carbon emissions before the impact of climate change becomes irreversible.

Nor did Trump say whether the U.S. will join the global community in trying to avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change by implementing stricter controls on pollution-causing emissions and investing in clean energy.

Trump didn’t even say whether he had looked at the report, nor whether he even planned to read it. He did, however, acknowledge that he was aware of the existence of the report. Well, sort of.

“It was given to me,” Trump told reporters on the White House lawn Tuesday. “I want to look at who drew it.”

“You know, which group drew it,” he continued. “Because I can give you reports that are fabulous, and I can give you reports that aren’t so good. But I will be looking at it, absolutely.”

It’s unclear what Trump was referring to when he said he wanted to “look at who drew it,” given that he’s talking about a scientific report, not a finger painting.

The assessment was published by a Nobel prize-winning international panel of more than 90 scientists from 40 countries, and included more than 6,000 references and 42,000 comments from governments and subject area experts.

The U.S. was one of the countries that requested the new report when the Paris climate accord went into effect. But that was then and this is now.

Last summer, Trump announced that he was pulling the U.S. out of the international climate agreement.

He has also repeatedly called climate change a “hoax,” and his administration made a name for itself by denying climate science, lying about the effects of climate change, and dismantling environmental protections in the name of big business. 

Perhaps it’s too much to expect that the person in charge of U.S. foreign policy would actually read a report that will dictate U.S. foreign policy for decades to come. After all, Trump isn’t known to be much of a reader — although he reportedly does like graphics and maps.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

David Perdue
David Perdue

With most conservative candidates in primary races across the country pledging allegiance to former President Trump and disseminating his Big Lie, what is a Republican candidate to do to get ahead? Why, just accuse their Republican opponent of having ties to China, of course!

Spurious, misleading, and even exaggerated accusations of connections with China are a source of anxiety for Republicans in the 2022 races, while campaign strategists and candidates have labeled such allegations a “prime attack in a Republican primary,” according to the Washington Post.

Keep reading... Show less

John Eastman

Former Trump attorney John Eastman used his University of Colorado email account to collude with a Republican lawmaker in Pennsylvania to formulate a pretext to seat Trump electors in a state Joe Biden won by nearly 82,000 votes. It was a last ditch-bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election, new emails obtained by the House Select Committee show.

Eastman devised a sinister idea to label tens of thousands of absentee ballots illegitimate, thus giving then-President Trump the state’s popular vote lead. This method, Eastman proposed, “would help provide some cover,” beneath which Republicans could swap Biden’s electors with sham electors for Trump who would subvert the 2020 elections.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}