The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Donald Trump met with Vladimir Putin at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland on Monday as controversy raged over the investigation into the Russian president’s covert role in the 2016 election of his US counterpart.

As he went into an early breakfast with Finnish president Sauli Niinistö at the palace, Trump sought to reassure reporters about his meeting with Putin, “We’ll do fine,” he said.

But only hours before, Trump had sent out a characteristic blast on Twitter, blaming the current difficulties between the US and Russia on opposition to the former Soviet spy’s conduct and policies — not on Putin’s electoral meddling and imperial incursions.

In a fulsome early morning tweet he complained: “Our relationship with Russia has NEVER been worse thanks to many years of U.S. foolishness and stupidity and now, the Rigged Witch Hunt!” That final phase is of course Trump’s favorite way to describe the special counsel probe of possible collusion between Russia and his campaign  — which led to the Justice Department’s announcement last Friday of the indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officials.

“President Obama thought that Crooked Hillary was going to win the election, so when he was informed by the FBI about Russian Meddling, he said it couldn’t happen, was no big deal, & did NOTHING about it,” Trump also tweeted. “When I won it became a big deal and the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by Strzok,” referring to Peter Strzok, an FBI agent who wrote texts critical of Trump and was later removed from the probe by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The Kremlin had the last word, just before the Putin-Trump meeting began, when it retweeted Trump’s message on US relations with Russia, adding: “We agree.”

 

 

 

 

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Wandrea "Shaye" Moss

YouTube Screenshot

Just who deserves protection in America?

If you observe the folks this country chooses to protect and chooses to ignore, you may get an answer that doesn’t exactly line up with America’s ideals.

Keep reading... Show less
YouTube Screenshot

The First Amendment reflects a principled but shrewd attitude toward religion, which can be summarized: Government should keep its big fat nose out of matters of faith. The current Supreme Court, however, is not in full agreement with that proposition. It is in half agreement — and half is not enough.

This section of the Bill of Rights contains two commands. First, the government can't do anything "respecting an establishment of religion" — that is, sponsoring, subsidizing or providing special favors for religious institutions or individuals.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}