The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

During a rage-fueled rant in Phoenix a few days ago, President Donald Trump threatened a government shutdown if Congress doesn’t appropriate the billions he needs to construct a wall along the southern border. Though he now ignores his once-upon-a-time pledge that Mexico would pay for the wall, it’s no surprise that the president pulled out a signature red-meat theme.

His poll numbers are trending steadily downward, and a raucous xenophobia tends to energize his base. In a campaign-style rally, he whipped up the frenzy with escalating rhetoric: “If we have to close down our government, we’re building that wall,” he exclaimed, as supporters chanted, “Build the wall!”
Let’s ignore, for a moment, the virtually insurmountable logistical, legal, economic and political obstacles presented by such a project. Even if Trump were to build his promised barrier — and that’s quite unlikely — it would not solve the nation’s biggest immigration challenge: what to do about the undocumented people who are already here.

The huge waves of workers who crossed the border without documents have ebbed to a trickle, having slowed substantially during the Great Recession. It was back during the late 1990s and early 2000s that the wave crested, when home construction was booming and businesses demanded cheap labor.
Back then, Democratic and Republican administrations alike conspired to ignore the low-wage workers who were surging across the border because big farmers wanted them, hoteliers wanted them, construction magnates (yes, Trump, too) wanted them. Nowadays, rates of illegal entry are about as low as they’ve been in 40 years, if Border Patrol apprehensions are any indication.

But we have insisted on keeping the millions of people who remain here living in the shadows indefinitely. There are among us — cleaning hotel rooms, mowing lawns, attending college, flipping burgers, playing high school basketball, picking onions, supervising construction sites, managing small shops — an estimated 11 million people without papers. They work hard, pay taxes, own homes, attend parent-teacher conferences, speak English and stand for the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag.

A few go astray, selling illegal narcotics, driving under the influence, joining gangs, robbing stores. But illegal immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than those who were born here. (To the consternation of his Latino supporters, Obama deported more undocumented workers than his predecessor — or Trump — concentrating on violent criminals.)

The criminals are outnumbered by the young adults — known as Dreamers — who qualified for President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which granted work permits to those who met certain criteria. (Nearly 2 million were eligible for DACA, but only about 800,000 were actually granted deferrals from deportation.)

Trump, of course, ran on a pledge of mass deportation, and it may be that some of his die-hard supporters still believe that he can round up millions — including grandmothers, kindergarteners and infants — and send them back. But the rest of us know better.

As it turns out, most of us don’t even want that to happen. According to a Marist poll conducted in February, 80 percent of those surveyed supported a path to citizenship for the illegal immigrants who are already here. That included 69 percent of Republicans. An even larger percentage of Trump’s voters approve of allowing Dreamers to stay — 78 percent, according to a July survey by Morning Consult.

That makes sense. From big cities in California to small towns in Iowa, Americans have gotten used to working with and living beside people with different languages and cultures. That familiarity eases fear and resentment.

Still, the nativist minority has managed to scare the wits out of most Republican politicians, who fear a right-wing election challenge if they dare suggest a reasonable pathway to legal status. Indeed, 10 Republican-led states have sued the Trump administration to end the Dreamers program. So far, Trump hasn’t responded to the lawsuit, so it’s not clear what he will do.

Though the president has promised to treat the Dreamers “with heart,” his xenophobic impulses have kept the waters roiled, making a grand bargain on immigration reform nigh impossible. Even as a political mirage, Trump’s wall is a formidable barrier to the American Dream for our undocumented neighbors.

Cynthia Tucker won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2007. She can be reached at cynthia@cynthiatucker.com.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Danziger Draws

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons and one novel. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Attorney General Merrick Garland

Photo by The White House

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

The Department of Justice had the kind of pro-police reform week that doesn't happen every year. In a seven-day period, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a ban on chokeholds and no-knock warrants, an overhaul on how to handle law enforcement oversight deals, and a promise to make sure the Justice Department wasn't funding agencies that engage in racial discrimination.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}