The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Chad Terhune, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

LOS ANGELES — Hospitals and health insurers have reaped a financial windfall from the 2014 rollout of the federal health law, even beyond what was expected.

Now, employers and consumers are seeking a share of the Obamacare dividend.

For years, insurance companies and hospitals told Americans that one reason their insurance bills were so high was because they were paying the hidden cost of medical care for the uninsured.

The Affordable Care Act sought to remedy much of that by unleashing the biggest expansion of insurance coverage in half a century. Ten million Americans became newly insured, and federal officials estimate that $5.7 billion in uncompensated care was wiped out this year as hospitals received more paying patients.

Now it’s time to share the bounty from Obamacare, said Bill Kramer, director of national health policy at the Pacific Business Group on Health, which represents big employers like Wells Fargo and Chevron.

“Consumers and businesses have been absorbing this cost shift for decades,” he said. “Employers need to step up and put pressure on hospitals and health plans. Show us the money.”

In a similar vein, consumer groups are questioning why these savings aren’t showing up in health insurers’ latest rates. By some estimates, the cost shifting in recent years typically has raised the average family premium by $1,000 or more annually.

But there have been benefits for employers and consumers — even though they may not be readily apparent, industry officials say. They point to historically low increases in overall medical spending and affordable premiums in government-run exchanges.

“The dividend is being shared,” said Charles Kahn, chief executive of the Federation of American Hospitals, an industry trade group in Washington. “There are a lot of factors indicating the costs to many are coming down or moderating. But all the problems that brought about cost shifting aren’t being washed away.”

Providers say government reimbursements for patients on Medicare and in particular Medicaid don’t always cover their costs. The health law also imposes funding cuts to hospitals.

Health insurers insist they always bargain for the best deal from medical providers, and they say other factors are pushing up costs at the same time. They fault pharmaceutical companies for charging exorbitant amounts for some specialty drugs and worry that a wave of hospital consolidation will drive up prices even further.

“While this cost shifting is decreasing, theoretically that should drive down health care costs,” said Dr. J. Mario Molina, chief executive of Molina Healthcare Inc., a health insurer based in Long Beach. “People are going to scratch their head and say, ‘What happened?'”

Molina’s short answer: “It’s the drugs. A huge pipeline of new pharmaceuticals is going to push us back into double-digit health care inflation.”

That hasn’t happened yet, and hospital chains and insurers have posted strong results, to the delight of Wall Street.

Profits at HCA Holdings Inc., the largest publicly traded hospital chain, jumped 18 percent to $1.7 billion for the first nine months of 2014 compared with the same period a year earlier. The Nashville company’s shares have soared 53 percent this year.

Likewise, health insurance stocks have rallied as the federal government guaranteed millions of new customers and spent billions of taxpayer dollars subsidizing their premiums. Insurers are handling much of the Medicaid expansion under state contracts.

Insurance giant Anthem Inc. signed up nearly 800,000 people on Obamacare exchanges across the country. Its shares rose 33 percent year to date — three times the increase in the broader Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index.

The biggest changes have occurred in the 27 states that have expanded Medicaid, the government health insurance program for the poor. HCA reported a 55 percent decline in uninsured patients and 30 percent growth in Medicaid business in five states where it operates and where the program was expanded.

Megan Neuburger, a Fitch Ratings analyst who tracks the for-profit hospital industry, said the turnabout has been dramatic.

“I think the Affordable Care Act has been more positive for the hospital industry than analysts had expected or even the industry expected it to be,” she said.

Uncompensated care totaled about $50 billion for hospitals last year, studies show. The Obama administration said the federal government has typically covered about 60 percent of those medical bills.

But the health law anticipated the decrease in bad debt and reduces future government payments to hospitals. The American Hospital Association estimates that hospitals have already experienced $122 billion in funding cuts since 2010.

U.S. workers aren’t likely to feel much sympathy. Medical costs are taking a bigger bite out of their paychecks while wages are largely stagnant.

Family premiums for an employer health plan rose 73 percent in the last decade, and workers’ share of the bill jumped 93 percent, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund.

On average this year, employers and workers combined spent $16,834 annually for a family health plan.

Dena Mendelsohn, a health policy analyst at Consumers Union in San Francisco, challenged 6 percent rate increases by Anthem and Blue Shield of California this year in a report to state regulators. She cited, among other issues, their failure to account for the drop in uncompensated care.

“We were puzzled because they didn’t factor it in,” she said. “The amount of cost shifting should go down.”

Insurers say it takes time for these changes to filter through and the effect remains unclear. The rate hikes for more than 1 million individual policyholders take effect next month.

The prospect of financial relief for consumers may vary across the country depending on whether a state expands Medicaid as well as the balance of power between hospitals and health plans locally.

The sterling reputation of some hospitals makes it difficult for insurers to bargain effectively or follow through on the threat to drop them from an insurance network, said Paul Ginsburg, a professor at the University of Southern California’s Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics.

Without outside pressure, he said, the first inclination of many hospitals may be to spend any extra money themselves.

“There are clearly some hospitals that have enormous leverage with insurers,” Ginsburg said. “Hospital administrators and their boards see opportunities to fund all these things they haven’t been able to do until now.”

AFP Photo/Karen Bleier


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

The baseless claim that the FBI may have planted evidence while carrying out a court-approved search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence on Monday has surged through right-wing media, as the former president’s allies continue their effort to turn their audiences against the probe and shield Trump from accountability.

The FBI searched the premises after obtaining a warrant from a federal magistrate judge and “removed a number of boxes of documents” as part of a federal investigation into whether Trump had illegally “taken a trove of material with him to his home at Mar-a-Lago when he left the White House that included sensitive documents – and then, in the Justice Department’s view, had failed to fully comply with requests that he return the disputed material,” the New York Times reported. Politico concluded after consulting with legal experts on the handling of classified documents that “it’s highly unlikely the DOJ would have pursued – and a judge would have granted – such a politically explosive search warrant without extraordinary evidence.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}