The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Virginia attorney general Mark Herring announced on Thursday that he would side with plaintiffs challenging the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, rather than defend it on behalf of the state.

Herring, a Democrat elected on Governor Terry McAuliffe’s ticket, said his views on marriage equality have changed over the years.

“I had voted against marriage equality eight years ago back in 2006, even though at the time I was speaking out against discrimination and ways to end discrimination, and I was wrong for not applying it to marriage,” Herring told NPR. “I saw very soon after that how that hurt a lot of people and it was very painful for a lot of people.”

Like some other Democrats who “evolved” on the issue, Herring says his family and constituents played a role in his decision to side with those seeking to strike down the ban.

“They were instructive about the relationships that people have, and they were helpful in getting me to see a different perspective,” Herring said. “They pressed me for the position I had taken and made me continue to question it, and I just came to the conclusion that it was the right thing to do.”

Herring’s decision is the latest sign of just how influential the recent gubernatorial election will be for the Commonwealth. The 2013 election marked the first time since 1969 that Virginians elected both a Democratic attorney general and governor. Herring’s predecessor and the Republican nominee for governor, Ken Cuccinelli, was staunchly opposed to same-sex marriage. As attorney general, Cuccinelli vowed to uphold Virginia’s ban, which was passed by a popular vote in 2006.

Governor McAuliffe, on his first day in office, issued on executive order that banned discrimination against LGBT state employees.

Virginia’s Democratic leadership quickly spoke out in support of Herring’s decision, arguing that it puts him “on the right side of history.”

“Discrimination of any kind has no place in this country or Commonwealth,” Virginia Democratic Party chair Charniele Herring (no relation) said in a statement. “I support Attorney General Herring in his legal assessment and conclusion that ‘to defend a[n] unconstitutional law…would be a violation of [his oath], misuse of office, and would be inconsistent with precedents.”

Virginia voters also appear to back the attorney general’s decision. A survey conducted last summer by the Human Rights Campaign found that 55 percent of Virginians support same-sex marriage.

AFP Photo/Scott Olson


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

The 1864 Arizona law that was reinstated by a judge’s ruling on Friday bans all abortions except to save the life of the mother. Described in most reports as a law passed during the time Arizona was a territory, before it achieved statehood in 1912, one important fact has been omitted both from the judge’s decision and from the press reports on the draconian abortion ban: Arizona was a territory in 1864 all right, but it wasn’t a territory of the United States. The territorial legislature that passed the abortion ban did so on behalf of the Confederate States of America, into which Arizona was accepted when Jefferson Davis signed “An Act to Organize the Territory of Arizona” on January 18, 1862.

Keep reading... Show less

Immigrants crossing from Mexico into the United States

Youtube Screenshot

America needs more immigrants, but we seem determined to shoot ourselves in the foot. Before addressing that self-sabotage, permit a small digression.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}