The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) rose to the floor of the Senate on Thursday morning to introduce the Truth in Settlements Act, which is co-sponsored by Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK).

“Several years ago the government announced a $385 million settlement with Fresenius Medical Care for allegedly defrauding Medicare and other health programs for years,” Warren said. “When the agreement was originally announced, the Justice Department touted the sticker price as the agency’s largest civil recovery to date in a health care fraud case. But the DOJ didn’t say a word about the tax treatment. The agency’s failure to even consider that issue was a very costly mistake. By the time the company finished claiming all its tax deductions from the settlement, it ended up paying $100 million less than originally advertised. In other words, the taxpayers picked up more than a quarter of the tab.”

The senator also compared a settlement last year between Wells Fargo and the Federal Housing Finance agency for $335 million in fraudulent sales to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which was about 6 percent of what JPMorgan paid to the same agency for a similar claim.

What was the difference in the two settlements?

“Well, we’ll never know because the JPMorgan settlement is public. But the much smaller Wells Fargo settlement is confidential.”

The bill implements several requirements on settlements made in disputes that are not being litigated, including a requirement that the government offer a rationale whenever an agreement is kept confidential.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump and Melania Trump

Youtube Screenshot

In a Monday court filing, the Justice Department asked a federal court not to unseal the affidavit showing probable cause for the warrant to search Mar-a-Lago, giving reasons that underscore the hot water Donald Trump appears to be in.

Disclosing the affidavit now would, according to the filing, “cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation.” It would do that by revealing, “among other critically important and detailed investigative facts: highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government; specific investigative techniques; and information required by law to be kept under seal.”

Keep reading... Show less

Lara Trump

Youtube Screenshot

When Donald Trump revealed last Monday night that the FBI had “raided” his Mar-a-Lago resort and residence, Fox News had an asset on its payroll uniquely positioned to provide its audience with insight: The former president’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, is a Fox contributor. But unfortunately for the network’s viewers, over the past week she's been using her network platform to mislead them.

Members of the Trump orbit, including Lara Trump’s husband, Eric, deployed to Fox last week offering the expected furious defenses of the former president and denunciations of the FBI’s probe. But if there’s any value whatsoever in putting a former president’s relative on staff, surely it is in the aftermath of such an event, when she might have both rare access to credible information and a willingness to reveal it.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}