The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Having departed the Republican presidential field, businessman Herman Cain still retains a substantial amount of power over this race.

He can (and, he promised Saturday, will) endorse another candidate, and while many of his supporters will find a new favorite on their own, we have to imagine at least a few will take Cain’s pick seriously.

With reports emerging that he’ll likely choose fellow Georgian Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House might then find himself in a position to complete his absorption of the anti-Romney vote among conservatives, a feat he has accomplished in a remarkable few weeks.

But what if that’s wrong, and Herman Cain — sleazy, rude, prone to sexual harassment and generally awful treatment of women — getting behind fellow philanderer and two-time-divorcee Newt Gingrich only reminds conservatives of everything they dislike about Newt Gingrich, halting his rise and even damaging his candidacy?

This is not to say conservative activists will have a feminist awakening and decide they need someone to lead them who respects women as equal members of society. No, rather it is that a Cain endorsement — with all the weird, tacky implications — might remind conservative activists, for example, of Newt’s cynical conversion to Catholicism in advance of his third marriage (to a former congressional staffer he cheated on his previous wife with).

Newt’s path to the Republican nomination is as an intellectual in a party that hates them, a thinker in a movement that wants to move past them. His characterization of Paul Ryan’s Medicare privatization scheme as “right-wing social engineering” was that of a history professor, not a politician, and yet these same academic tendencies have made him a solid debater and confident general election opponent for conservatives’ greatest foe: Barack Obama.

The former Speaker’s brand only flies when he’s in the ring and not drawing attention to his conduct on the sidelines. A Cain endorsement does exactly that: reminds us of what we don’t like about Newt. Which is why he should be wary of publicly seeking or embracing it.

Follow Political Correspondent Matt Taylor on Twitter @matthewt_ny.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less


YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}