Tag: aggressive
Billionaire Tesla/SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and MAGA businessman Vivek Ramaswamy

Loomer And Bannon Spitting MAGA Vitriol At Musk And Ramaswamy

Billionaire Tesla/SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and MAGA businessman Vivek Ramaswamy were aggressive supporters of Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential race, and the president-elect has tapped them to head a new advisory commission that he has proposed: the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Although Ramaswamy ran against Trump in the GOP presidential primary, his criticism of him was mild; Ramaswamy was much more forceful in his attacks on former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, another primary candidate. And he ended up dropping out of the race and giving Trump a glowing endorsement.

Musk was a more than generous donor to Trump's campaign. But Musk and Ramaswamy, in late 2024, have been drawing vehement criticism from other MAGA Republicans after voicing their support for the use of immigrant workers in the tech sector.

The Atlantic's Ari Breland, in an article published on December 30, details the rage that MAGA nativists have been expressing against Trump's picks to lead DOGE.

That rage, according to Breland, has been coming from MAGA firebrand Laura Loomer, "War Room" host Steve Bannon and others.

"Elon Musk spent Christmas Day online, in the thick of a particularly venomous culture war — one that would lead him to later make the un-Christmas-like demand of his critics to 'take a big step back and F--K YOURSELF in the face," Breland explains. "Donald Trump had ignited this war by appointing the venture-capitalist Sriram Krishnan to be his senior AI-policy adviser. Encouraged by the MAGA acolyte and expert troll Laura Loomer, parts of the far-right internet melted down, arguing that Krishnan's appointment symbolized a betrayal of the principles of the 'America First' movement."

Breland adds, "Krishnan is an Indian immigrant and a U.S. citizen who, by virtue of his heritage, became a totem for the MAGA right to argue about H-1B visas, which allow certain skilled immigrants to work in the United States."

Meanwhile, Ramaswamy has infuriated nativists by praising the strong work ethic of immigrant tech experts.

"The tech right and nationalist right are separate but overlapping factions that operated in tandem to help get Trump reelected," Breland reports. "Now, they are at odds. For possibly the first time since Trump's victory, the racial animus and nativism that galvanized the nationalist right cannot immediately be reconciled with the tech right's desire to effectively conquer the world — and cosmos, in Musk's case — using any possible advantage. After winning the election together, one side was going to have to lose."

This MAGA "skirmish," according to Breland, "is a preview of how tension between the tech right and the nationalist right may play out once Trump takes office."

"The nationalists will likely get most of what they want," Breland predicts. "Trump has already promised mass deportations, to their delight. But when they butt heads with Silicon Valley, Trump will likely defer to his wealthiest friends."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Jim Jordan

Jim Jordan Making 'Aggressive Moves' To Replace Speaker Johnson

Since both Republicans and Democrats blocked Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) motion to vacate the speakership Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is safe — for now.

The Georgia lawmaker has not been the only Republican House member plotting on Johnson's removal, according to a Thursday, May 9 Axios report.

House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) has plans of his own to takeover his Louisiana colleague's position in 2025.

Per Axios, several sources said that "Jordan privately told colleagues what he would be doing differently than Johnson during the recent fight over foreign aid funding."

Additionally, the Ohio GOP leader "has been noticed handing out more campaign checks to colleagues," according to some of his colleagues, and one Republican told the news outlet "that Jordan previously said it was 'not his job' to help vulnerable members. His shift has raised his peers' eyebrows."

Jordan was vying for the speakership last year after Rep. Kevin McCarthy's (R-CA) ouster, but failed when "25 Republicans refused to vote for him on the House floor on his final ballot."

The Ohio lawmaker has not given up hope.

According to Axios, "Jordan has hit the trail for a bevy of Republicans in recent months, including vulnerable Republicans and" McCarthy allies.

Axios' full report is available here.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Murdoch Still Making the “Necessary Promises”

Distressed by his sinking fortunes, Rupert Murdoch finally spoke out today to defend himself, his progeny and his company – just as the FBI confirmed its agents are probing whether Murdoch’s minions illegally invaded the privacy of 9/11 victims and their families. Talking to the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by News Corporation, the old buccaneer’s outburst was predictably aggressive.

He insisted that his son James “acted as fast as he could, the moment he could” in dealing with the phone-hacking scandal that led to the shutdown of Murdoch’s huge tabloid, the News of the World. He claimed too that he had acted swiftly and properly himself, noting, “when I hear something going wrong, I insist on it being put right.” He and his son, along with other News Corp employees, will appear voluntarily to answer questions in Parliament, he vowed, saying, “We think it’s important to absolutely establish our integrity in the eyes of the public….I felt that it’s best just to be as transparent as possible.” And he promised to set up an independent committee, to be chaired by a “distinguished non-employee,” to investigate possible corporate wrongdoing and to establish a “protocol of behavior” for the company’s journalists.

Yet only the willfully naïve can listen to his denials of wrongdoing or his promises of reform with any degree of credence. We have heard all this many times before.

It is long past time for the dubious policies and practices of the Murdoch organization to come under official scrutiny, as they now will by the FBI, Scotland Yard, the British Parliament — and perhaps, as urged by members of both parties, by the United States Congress as well. Perhaps that horde of investigators will be able to determine the truth behind the worst charges, which range from the bribery of police officers to abuses against innocent terror victims to compromising the security of former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his family. While those probes must proceed under the presumption of innocence, the rest of us may consider Murdoch’s past performance, which is informative if not edifying.

As any longtime observer knows, he is never at a loss for alibis, excuses and professions of innocence, all of which deserve to be received with the same degree of sympathy as they would in the local police station-house if uttered by a repeat offender. And as any longtime observer also knows, he is always prepared to offer what are laughingly known among News Corp. insiders as “the necessary promises” to mend his ways, whenever he must do so to serve his imperial ambitions.

Such promises date back to the earliest years of his empire’s expansion from Australia and the United Kingdom to the United States. Back in 1980, for instance, Murdoch was caught in a blatant exchange of media favoritism for government favors, when the New York Post published a page-one endorsement of then-President Jimmy Carter against Senator Edward Kennedy, who had mounted an insurgent primary candidacy. That endorsement came three days after Murdoch met with Carter in the White House — and was followed almost immediately by a $300 million loan from the Export Import Bank, a federal entity, to an Australian airline owned by Murdoch.

It was a coincidence, nothing more, insisted Murdoch when he appeared before a Congressional investigating committee – and he promised never to do it again, lest his actions be “misconstrued.” Of course he went on to do the same thing many times, including his company’s disturbing publication and fawning promotion of a ridiculous biography of the late Chinese dictator Deng Xiaoping, penned by Deng’s daughter for a handsome sum. It was just a coincidence that Murdoch was then seeking permission from the Chinese government to establish highly lucrative television franchises in the People’s Republic.

A Murdoch employee once explained, in an unwittingly candid moment on videotape, that his master’s way of doing business can be “a little bit like the Mafia.” While that employee was terminated with extreme prejudice after his remarks were made public, what he said rings truer than ever today. The same fate that eventually brought down the Mafia – a long series of criminal and Congressional investigations and indictments – may await the man who, until so recently, ruled over news and politics like the boss of all bosses.

FDA Rolls Out Graphic Anti-Smoking Campaign

One of the changes wrought by the anti-smoking legislation President Barack Obama signed into law two years ago is new power for the Food and Drug Administration to put frightening warnings on cigarettes and advertise against their danger more aggressively. Check out the FDA’s Flickr feed for examples of the brutal imagery.

Obama, who puffed the occasional cigarette himself for some years, seems to have taken the legislation and the ad campaign to heart; Michelle Obama said in February that he hadn’t smoked in nearly a year, though we would have no way of knowing if he’s fallen off the wagon since.

 

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World