Tag: bureau of labor statistics
Tardy September Employment Data Reflects Trump's Weakening Job Market

Tardy September Employment Data Reflects Trump's Weakening Job Market

The data nerds among us were happy to finally get their September jobs report fix, even though these data are somewhat stale now. However, we still learned a few things about the state of the economy.

Before saying what we learned, it’s worth a few words on what we didn’t learn but people are saying anyway. First and foremost, this was not a strong report in any real-world sense of the term.

To be clear, the 119,000 jobs reported for the month was stronger than most analysts had expected, including me. But this hardly implies robust job growth. We averaged 170,000 jobs a month in 2024, so now we’re supposed to be celebrating a report showing job growth that is 70 percent of last year’s average?

But it gets worse. The prior two months’ data were both revised down. The average growth for the four months ending in September was less than 40,000. Furthermore, almost all the growth was in healthcare. Since May, the economy has added 174,000 jobs. The healthcare sector added 157,000 jobs, accounting for more than 90 percent of job growth over this period.

The job growth number for September is also likely to be revised downward. The direction of revisions tends to be autocorrelated. If the prior month was revised downward, then it’s better than a 50 percent chance this month’s number will be revised downward. When we get revisions for September in a few weeks, we will likely be looking at a lower number than 119,000.

Sectors that Are Not Growing

While healthcare continues to add jobs at healthy pace, although down from its 56,000 monthly average in 2024, most other sectors are not. Notably, manufacturing, which has been a main focus of the Trump administration, is shedding jobs. It lost 6,000 jobs in September; employment is down 49,000 since January.

Mining is also shedding jobs. The sector lost 2,000 jobs in September, pushing employment 8,000 below its January level. One of the many things that Trump seems to not understand is that if oil prices are low, oil companies don’t want to drill baby drill. With the current price hovering near $60 a barrel, drilling is unprofitable in many areas.

Construction employment was at least moving in the right direction, adding 19,000 jobs. But this just took employment back to its May level. Since January, the sector has created 19,000 jobs, an average of 2,400 a month. That compares to an average of 16,000 a month in 2024.

Sectors Not Growing by Design

Trump made his desire to cut federal government employment explicit and set Elon Musk to the task on his first day. The sector lost 2,700 jobs in September and is down 85,100 (3.6 percent) since Trump took office. Many of the workers taking Musk’s deferred departure were still on payroll through September. This should mean there will be a sharp fall in the October data.

Employment growth in state and local governments has also slowed considerably. Budget cuts at the federal level are playing a big role in stressing state and local governments. They have created 91,000 jobs since January, an average of 11,400 a month. That is down from a rate of almost 34,000 a month in 2024.

The category, “scientific research and development services” has lost almost 20k jobs this year (2.0 percent). It had been growing modestly, adding 6,400 jobs in 2024.

One final point on job growth, as has been widely noted, the clamping down on immigration means the labor force is growing far more slowly. We likely need only 30,000-60,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate stable.

Employment of Native-Born Workers Is Not Surging

One of the incredibly foolish things Republicans are saying is that the September employment report shows employment of native-born workers is soaring. Just looking at the published numbers, employment of native-born workers is up by 2,500,000 over the last year and by 680,000 in September alone.

The problem with this story is that it misunderstands how the Bureau of Labor Statistics constructs its employment survey. The survey has population controls, which impute a certain population every month based on the data from the prior year and estimates of growth due to birthrates, death rates, and immigration. The controls are locked in regardless of what actually happens in the world.

The controls fix the size of the population, but the number of people reported as foreign-born is taken from the survey. This number has fallen sharply. Part of that is due to people being deported or choosing to leave. Part of the drop is due to people not answering the survey and part of it is due to people lying and identifying as native-born, which is understandable under the circumstances.

Given the construction of the data, a drop in the number of foreign-born workers automatically leads to an increase in the reported number of native-born workers, since the total is fixed by the population controls. This means if Steven Miller took speed, stayed up all week, and deported every last foreign-born worker, the data would show an increase in native-born employment of 32,000,000. (I go into this in a bit more detail here.)

Anyhow, we surely have lost some number of foreign-born workers as a result of the Trump administration’s deportation drive. At this point, we don’t have any good basis for knowing the change in native-born employment, although the employment-to-population ratio is a good start. At 59.0 percent, it is 0.3 percentage points less than it was in September of 2024.

Unemployment is Edging Higher and Labor Market Is Weakening

As many of us had suspected, we are seeing a gradual weakening, not a collapse, of the labor market. By historical standards, 4.4 percent is relatively low, but we are a full percentage point above the recovery low in April of 2023.

For disadvantaged groups the increase has been considerably larger. The unemployment rate for Black workers stood at 7.5 percent in the September report, while the unemployment rate for young workers (ages 20-24) was 9.2 percent.

Both figures are the same as in the August data, but the unemployment rates for these groups are highly erratic. This means that the sharp deterioration in the labor market situation reported for these disadvantaged groups reported in prior months was not an aberration. The unemployment rate for Black workers had been at 4.8 percent in April of 2023 and the unemployment rate for young workers bottomed out at 5.5 percent in the same month. It is not surprising that these disadvantaged groups would rise much more than for the workforce as a whole in a weakening labor market.

We Are in a Low Quit, Low Hire Economy

Many analysts have long noted the sharp falloff in job movers reported in the JOLTS and other data. This report strengthens that view. The share of unemployment due to voluntary quits rose slightly to 11.8 percent, but that is still down from an average of 13.2 percent in 2018-2019, when the unemployment rate was comparable. Even more discouraging, the share of unemployment due to permanent layoffs rose 0.8 pp to 35.8 percent, the highest level since December 2021. That compares to an average of 33.3 in 2018-2019.

One piece of data that argues against much deterioration in the labor market is the relatively modest rise in the number of new and continuing unemployment insurance (UI) claims. Guy Berger regularly cites this statistic in his excellent Substack, High Frequency Labor Market Indicators.

While the weekly data on claims are useful, Guy also includes an index of weekly Google searches for “file for unemployment insurance.” This index had tracked the weekly claims data closely until early 2025 when the search measure rose rapidly, but the claims data remained pretty much flat.

There is not an obvious explanation for this divergence but let me throw one out. Even though most undocumented workers would not be eligible for UI, there are many people with some type of temporary status, who could end up unemployed. There are also people who might be here legally but have family members whose status is ambiguous. People in these situations may not want to risk calling attention to themselves by filing for unemployment insurance.

If there was a falloff in the willingness of foreign-born workers to file for UI, it could offset an increase in the number of people facing unemployment. A bit less than 20 percent of the workforce is foreign-born, so a substantial falloff in the probability of laid-off foreign-born workers applying for benefits would conceal a rise in layoffs. This story is obviously speculative, but the sudden divergence of searches and applications does indicate something different is happening in 2025.

A Rise in Wage Growth?

There was some good news in the September report. Wage growth picked up by my preferred measure. This takes the average hourly wage for the last three months (July-Sept) compared to the average for prior three months (April-June). That rose to a 4.0 percent annual rate. This is roughly the same as its rate in 2023 and 2024. It had shown some signs of slowing in prior months. The rate of wage growth for non-supervisory workers in the low-paid restaurant sector also picked up to 3.9 percent; it had been under 3.0 percent.

I said this is my preferred measure, but it is not widely used. If we take the year-over-year rate of wage growth, there has been little change. It stood at 3.7 percent in September, the same as the August rate.

I am not thrilled with using the year-over-year rate since it includes data that at this point is quite old. If wages grew rapidly at the end of 2024, we would show a high pace of wage growth even if the rate had slowed substantially over the last few months.

Taking a single month, whether it be for a one-month period or even a three or six-month period, suffers from the fact that the monthly data are highly erratic and subject to large revisions. For example, the average hourly wage for August was originally reported as $36.53. It was revised up this month to $36.58.

This gives a hugely different story on the pace of wage growth using August as an endpoint. Annualizing the three-month rate for the originally reported number of $36.53 gives a 3.4 percent rate of wage growth. Annualizing using the revised $36.58 number gives a rate of wage growth of 3.9 percent. These are very different pictures of the labor market.

Taking an average of three months reduces, but does not eliminate, this problem. We’ll have to see whether the measure I prefer ends up being a useful predictor of future wage growth in this case. But for September, it does show a better picture than the data had indicated in prior months. Wage growth had been falling towards the inflation rate, meaning that real wage growth was stalling. The September data imply that wages are still outpacing inflation by close to a percentage point.

What About More Recent Data?

The September jobs report is giving us historical information at this point. The household survey that gives us the unemployment rate was taken more than two months ago. The more recent data seem to support the story of further labor market weakening.

The data from the payroll company ADP, now released weekly, show the private sector losing a modest number of jobs in October. With all delayed layoffs in the federal government from DOGE ending in September, there will be some additional job loss in the public sector as these workers will no longer be on the payroll.

The Indeed data for job listings continued its downward path, although there was a modest uptick in the mid-November figure. Continuing unemployment insurance claims also show a modest uptick, which is consistent with some further deterioration in the labor market.

We will not get unemployment data for October. The survey was not conducted and asking people to look back will not give reliable data. (This may sound stupid, but it really does matter exactly how and when the questions are asked.)

My expectation is that there will be a further rise in the unemployment rate for November when we get the data in the middle of next month. (This one is delayed a couple of weeks because of the shutdown.) I will be looking closely at the wage data. I will be surprised if there really is an uptick in the pace of wage growth.

The weakening of the labor market is bad news for tens of millions of workers who are trapped in their jobs and seeing lower real wages due to inflation. But it is not full-fledged recession stuff. That will have to wait for the collapse of the tech bubble.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Dean Baker.

Trump 's Economy Is Losing Jobs, So He Wants A New Scorekeeper

Trump 's Economy Is Losing Jobs, So He Wants A New Scorekeeper

When a football team has keeps losing, the cry usually goes out for a new coach, or at least a new quarterback. Alternatively, there is the Trump route: get a new scorekeeper.

That is apparently the story, with Trump reportedly looking to overhaul the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS is the statistical agency that tells us how many jobs we create each month. It tells us the unemployment rate. It also tells us the inflation rate.

Trump’s import taxes (tariffs), mass deportations, and cuts to healthcare and other government programs have whacked the economy with a sledgehammer. As a result, these numbers have looked very bad in recent months. Rather than trying to address the economic problems he created, Trump is looking to ransack BLS and install lying hacks who will tell us the economy is GREAT!

We’ll probably get the specific plans this week, but Trump already fired his first shot in this battle in his war against reality last month. He fired BLS Commissioner Erika Mcfartner after a bad jobs report for July, absurdly claiming that she had somehow rigged the numbers to make him look bad. Trump’s economic team then rushed in to lie about the lie and claim Trump was concerned about inaccuracy, not rigging.

The Problem is Trump, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics

It is not the scorekeepers’ fault when the quarterback keeps throwing interceptions, but that is the way Donald Trump plays football. The stalling economy is not a surprise to those of us who have paid close attention.

Since Trump came into office he has hit the economy with massive taxes in the form of hundreds of billions of dollars of tariffs. This is money coming out of the pockets of families and businesses. It doesn’t take an advanced degree in economics to know this will slow growth.

Making matters worse, he has imposed his tariffs like a reality TV show, promising higher tariffs or lower tariffs on some deadline, and then changing the dates and/or the threatened tariff rate. Reality TV show stars don’t have to make plans, businesses do. Ever changing tariff rates do not create a good investment climate. As a result, businesses are putting off investment and hiring decisions.

Trump’s erratic budget cuts, starting with Dark MAGA Elon and the DOGE boys, made matters worse. They cut employees and agencies in haphazard ways, both pulling money out of the economy and leaving some, like the FEMA and the FAA, ill-prepared to do their jobs. In addition, the budget cuts to healthcare in Trump’s “beautiful bill” are already forcing hospitals and other providers to lay off staff or even close altogether.

And mass deportation is preventing construction from moving forward in many areas and forcing farmers to leave crops rotting in the fields. Less output and higher prices are inevitable results.

So, a weak economy with rising unemployment and higher prices is hardly a surprise. But Trump refuses to fix or even acknowledge the problem. Instead, he reports that Putin told him the economy is booming. Trump insists the problem is with the scorekeeper.

Wrecking BLS Is Not Funny

The idea of ransacking a statistical agency, known for producing gold standard data for more than 100 years, may seem a silly concern of economics nerds, but it has very real-world consequences. It not only will make it more difficult for anyone to know how fast the economy is growing or how many jobs are being created; it makes it more difficult for businesses to operate and plan for the future. If we have statistical agencies that report the numbers Trump tells them to report, rather than what is actually happening in the economy, businesses will be cutting back investment here and looking to instead put their money in countries that don’t lie about their data.

Trump’s games with economic statistics will also affect us all directly in our pocketbooks. Social Security benefits increase each year in step with inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) produced by BLS. If Trump tells his lackeys to reduce the CPI by 1.0 percentage point, that means everyone will get 1.0 percent less in their Social Security check each month.

And this impact is cumulative. If Trump orders a 1.0 percentage point reduction in the CPI every year, then after two years, Social Security benefits will be 2.0 percent lower, after three years, benefits will be 3 percent lower, and after ten years they will be 10.0 percent lower.

The CPI also affects tax brackets, which are also indexed to inflation. As a result of Trump’s gaming, tens of millions of families will find that more of their income is in a higher tax bracket, meaning they will pay more in taxes. There is real money at stake in economic data.

We Need to Deal with Reality, not Trump’s Alternative Universe

Trump’s economic policies are imposing huge costs on tens of millions of people. He will make matters much worse if he wrecks BLS and other government statistical agencies to make it harder for us to know exactly how much worse. Hiding the truth may make it easier for Trump to run around saying “GREATEST ECONOMY EVER!” but it will make life much more difficult for those not living in Trump’s circle of grift.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book “Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer.” A version of this column originally appeared on his Substack site.

Scott Bessent

Trump Economic Advisers: A Team Of Cowards

Donald Trump’s decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), brought his administration to a new level of crazy. Firing the head of a statistical agency because he didn’t like the data is extreme even by Trumpian standards. But Trump’s statements on the firing and the response of his top aides also tell us a lot about the people he has surrounding himself with.

In making his case that McEntarfer was cooking numbers to make Biden and Harris look good, and to make him look bad, Trump has repeatedly claimed that McEntarfer inflated the jobs numbers before the election and then revised them downward shortly after the election. While everything about Trump’s allegations is transparently absurd to anyone who knows anything about BLS procedures, this claim stands out in that it is about a simple fact that is easily shown to be wrong.

The downward revision to which Trump referred was made on August 21, 2024, more than two months before the election. This revision was widely discussed in the media at the time. For example, the New York Times and Los Angeles Times both had major news articles on it.

Anyhow, this is a clear indisputable fact. Trump is mistaken, the revisions took place before the election, not after the election as Trump keeps insisting. Donald Trump’s top economic advisers, people like NEC director Kevin Hassett, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Stephen Miran, the chair of his Council of Economic Advisers, are not stupid. They all know that Trump is clearly mistaken on this simple, but very important fact.

Yet apparently none of them can talk to Trump and explain to him his mistake. This is a big deal in the current situation, but it should also be taken as a really big warning on the troubles ahead.

If Trump decides something about the state of the economy, no one on his team is going to ever correct him, no matter how crazy it is. If his tariffs, budget cuts, and arbitrary and ad hoc regulatory changes give us 20 percent unemployment and 20 percent inflation, and Trump says we have a perfect economy, none of his aides is going tell him otherwise. That means that there will never be any opportunity to correct a mistaken policy, because Trump’s advisers are too scared to tell him the real economic situation.

That is very bad news. This means that we not only are looking at bad outcomes due to poorly crafted policies, we are likely looking at situations where Trump will never reverse course because his aides are too scared to tell Trump the truth about the state of the economy.

Everyone understands that a president’s cabinet will be loyal to them, but the willingness of Trump’s top aides to completely ignore reality to humor their boss is unprecedented in this country. It is very bad news.

Dean Baker is an economist, author, and co-founder of the Center for Economic Policy and Research. His writing has appeared in many major publications, including The Atlantic, The Washington Post, and The Financial Times. Please consider subscribing to his Substack Dean Baker.

Reprinted with permission from Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Substack.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World