Tag: eric cantor
Behind No Campaign To Stop Virginia Redistricting Are Usual MAGA Suspects

Behind No Campaign To Stop Virginia Redistricting Are Usual MAGA Suspects

President Donald Trump ignited a nationwide redistricting battle when he directed Republicans in the Texas Legislature in 2025 to redraw their congressional map in a bid to maintain GOP control of the U.S. House of Representatives and pick up seats in the 2026 midterm elections.

Now some of Trump’s supporters and fellow Republicans in Virginia are helping to lead the fight against Democrat lawmakers’ efforts to redraw districts in the commonwealth in response.

On April 21, Virginia will hold a special election referendum on a temporary constitutional amendment that would allow the commonwealth’s Democratic-led General Assembly to draw a new congressional map. Early voting on the amendment has been ongoing since March 6.

If the amendment passes, it would create new district boundaries that could change Virginia’s House delegation from six Democrats and five Republicans to 10 Democrats and one Republican. Nationwide, Republicans so far have a slight edge over Democrats in the number of House seats that could be picked up in the midterms following redistricting efforts.

Republican anti-redistricting advocates like Gov. George Allen and former state House Speaker Bill Howell, who lead the group No Gerrymandering Virginia, and former Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares, who head up Virginians for Fair Maps, have characterized the redistricting campaign in the commonwealth as antidemocratic. However, they have remained silent on Trump’s original push for the GOP to gerrymander in Texas, said Dan Gottlieb, the spokesperson for Virginians for Fair Elections, a pro-redistricting group.

“I’m going to call them collectively the ‘No’ effort, because I think they’re all part of the same kind of, at this point, MAGA misinformation machine,” Gottlieb said.

“They’re trying to sort of make it this kind of disparate but very clearly coordinated effort to deliberately mislead voters, outright confuse voters, specifically Democratic voters, about what this measure is, about why it’s so important to actually take action to level the playing field, what Trump’s power grab is actually going to mean in practice, and, frankly, who’s funding this misinformation,” Gottlieb continued.

Brian Cannon, a Democrat who helps to lead No Gerrymandering Virginia, said the anti-redistricting efforts are not about misinformation but about calling out gerrymandering on both sides of the political spectrum. He said Democrats could pick up an additional 40 House seats in November and don’t need to gerrymander to achieve that number.

“I’m a Democrat, and I’ve teamed up with other Democrats and Republicans on No Gerrymandering Virginia to specifically call out the Donald Trump mid-decade redistricting push, as well as the Democrats’ mid-decade redistricting push in response; both are wrong,” Cannon said.

“There’s lots of ways to fight back against Trump, whether it’s keeping ICE out of the polls or whether it’s protecting ballot chain of custody and supporting our Election Day poll workers better,” Cannon continued. “There’s lots of things we can do to make sure our elections are free and secure. Rigging them is something we don’t need to do.”

Proponents of redistricting say that, had Trump never pushed Texas Republicans to change their map in an attempt to pick up five GOP House seats in the November midterms, there would be no current campaign for redistricting in Virginia.

Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who voted in favor of the ballot measure on March 26, told reporters, “This amendment is temporary and responsive to this moment in time where we have a President who has gone to other states seeking additional congressional seats saying he is quote ‘entitled to them.”

“We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,” Trump told CNBC’s Squawk Box in August. “We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.”

Currently, a bipartisan redistricting commission made up of eight lawmakers and eight citizens redraws the map of Virginia’s 11 congressional districts once every 10 years, following the national census. The map was last redrawn in 2021 and will be redrawn again in 2031. That bipartisan commission would resume redrawing the maps after Oct. 31, 2030, should the amendment pass.

“There’s no more democratic process than putting these maps directly to the voters, putting this process directly in front of them and saying, You decide. Nothing goes into effect without your say,” Gottlieb said. “And we’re going to hold a public election out 45 days of early vote for you to decide. Whether you agree with it or not, it is actually the most democratic process there is for something that, frankly, I think we all should hopefully be able to agree shouldn’t be a decision that we have to make, but that Trump and MAGA Republicans have forced the commonwealth of Virginia to make.”

To get their message out, anti-redistricting advocates have sent out mailers critics call misleading and offensive. Some of them compare support for the ballot measure to voter suppression efforts against Black people during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, using imagery from the Jim Crow era; others take quotes out of context to imply that figures such as Spanberger and former President Barack Obama oppose the measure, while both of them have in fact appeared in advertising urging a yes vote.

Gottlieb criticized the mailers: “To take something as painful as the imagery that they deliberately chose to come out the gates with and send to, by our estimates, a couple thousand, if not tens of thousands, of folks their very first weekend they could go vote was a choice made out of fear, both of their fear of losing and their hope that they could scare people, specifically Black and brown folks who have been historically disenfranchised and targeted with fear tactics, with scare tactics.”

‘Trump is the general’

Jon Baker, a Richmond resident and retired chemistry professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, said anti-redistricting leaders are doing Trump’s bidding.

“Those are simply soldiers in the battle, but Trump is the general,” said Baker, who voted for the redistricting amendment. “Trump issued his orders, and they’re his allies, and they’re trying to carry it out. … To me, it’s a referendum on the Trump administration, on the Trump presidency.”

Should the amendment not pass, Trump’s power would remain unchecked by Congress, Baker said.

“I feel we need to have some balance,” he said. “I’m a strong opponent of the Trump administration. There needs to be oversight. There needs to be committees that are able to do investigations, have hearings, to have some check on what I perceive as a really out-of-control executive branch.”

J. Miles Coleman, an associate editor at Sabato’s Crystal Ball, a nonpartisan political analysis newsletter run by the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said: “I think, at the end of the day, this is going to get turned into an up-or-down vote on, basically, Donald Trump. This is a state that he lost three times.”

Coleman said he’s not sure how much it will matter to voters that Trump allies are working against the redistricting measure — or how much the general public is even aware of their involvement. Cantor, for example, resigned his seat in Virginia’s 7th Congressional District in 2014 after a defeat in the Republican primary, which may be long enough ago that the general public isn’t giving him very much thought, Coleman said.

“He does have a good network, but in some ways, I feel like anything pre-Trump now in politics is just ancient history,” Coleman said.

Leslie Caughell, a political science professor at Virginia Wesleyan University, said it is Trump who is playing the major role against Virginia’s redistricting amendment.

“The real important person for the Republican Party is going to be President Trump and how much attention he’s able to draw to this,” she said. “Because I don’t think most Virginians know about this, and it’s also a complicated issue.”

Trump has not yet made a public statement about redistricting in Virginia.

Reprinted with permission from The Virginia Independent

Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor Takes Job On Wall Street

Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor Takes Job On Wall Street

By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times

Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is moving to Wall Street, taking a job with investment bank Moelis & Co., the firm said.

Cantor, 51 who resigned last month after an upset loss in a Republican primary in June, will be vice chairman and managing director at the 7-year-old company.

The veteran lawmaker “will provide strategic counsel to the firm’s corporate and institutional clients on key issues,” the company said in a news release Monday night. Cantor also “will play a leading role in client development and advise clients on strategic matters,” it said.

“Eric has proven himself to be a pro-business advocate and one who will enhance our boardroom discussions with CEOs and senior management as we help them navigate their most important strategic decisions,” said Ken Moelis, chief executive of the investment bank.

Cantor becomes the latest official to cash in on Wall Street after working in Washington. Last year, former Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner joined private equity firm Warburg Pincus.

Cantor was elected to the House from a Richmond, Va., area district in 2001. A strong business advocate, he rose through the leadership ranks and became majority leader when Republicans took control of the House after the 2010 elections.

But Cantor became the first congressional leader in a generation to lose his seat in an election when he was upset in the GOP primary by Dave Brat, who had strong backing from the tea party.

A local college professor, Brat criticized Cantor for working on immigration reform and drew strong support from tea party supporters unhappy that House Republican leaders were not more forcefully opposing President Obama.

With no chance of winning reelection in November, Cantor stepped down as majority leader and was replaced by Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield). Cantor left Congress on Aug. 18. Wall Street was a logical landing spot for Cantor.

During his congressional career, he raised more money — $3 million — from the securities and investment industry than any other sector, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

“When I considered options for the next chapter of my career, I knew I wanted to join a firm with a great entrepreneurial spirit that focused on its clients,” said Cantor, a lawyer and former small businessman.

“The new model of independent banks offering conflict-free advice, in a smaller, more intimate environment, was a place where I knew my skills could help clients succeed,” he said.

AFP Photo/Mark Wilson

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Eric Cantor To Resign From Congress

Eric Cantor To Resign From Congress

Washington (AFP) – Just hours after stepping down as U.S. House majority leader, Republican Representative Eric Cantor announced he would resign from his congressional seat later this month.

Establishment heavyweight Cantor lost his seat to an even more conservative but virtually unknown challenger in a June election amid deep divisions within the Republican Party ahead of November’s congressional vote.

But he had been expected to keep his seat until his term ends in January.

“I want to make sure that the constituents in the Seventh District will have a voice in what will be a very consequential lame-duck session,” Cantor told the Richmond Times-Dispatch late Thursday.

Cantor said he has asked Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe to call a special election for his district coinciding with the November 4 general election.

Holding such a special election for his seat in November would allow the winner to take office immediately, rather than in January with the next congressional session.

“That way he (the winner) will also have seniority, and that will help the interests of my constituents (because) he can be there in that consequential lame-duck session,” Cantor explained.

Kevin McCarthy replaced Cantor as House majority leader.

Cantor, who had been the only Jewish Republican in Congress, has expressed frustration at divisions in Washington and the glacial pace in Congress.

“There is a lot of business that is still to be done,” he told the Richmond Times-Dispatch. “I wish that Washington would act quicker.”

Cantor declined to reveal his plans for life after Congress.

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

The Democratic Party Is The Only Home For Centrists

The Democratic Party Is The Only Home For Centrists

This is a letter to political centrists.

For those of you alarmed that Rep. Eric Cantor was not conservative enough for Republicans in Virginia’s 7th congressional district, I encourage you to read Charles Wheelan’s The Centrist Manifesto. Wheelan, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College, puts to words what we can all sense: Partisan gridlock is becoming more than a nuisance in our lives. It is threatening our economy, our children’s educations, the welfare of the planet, and every other national priority.

Take a read through Wheelan’s “Manifesto.” It’s a short read, published last year after it became clear that President Obama’s re-election would not bring a new age of bipartisanship to Washington. Wheelan calls for the center to step outside of the two major parties and stand up for itself. In noting that the fastest growing bloc of voters is Independents, Wheelan argues that both the Democratic and Republican parties have driven out moderates by standing only for their political bases — and that the only resolution to this is an organized movement of Independents.

Take a read, because Wheelan is wrong.

Wheelan’s vision may have made sense in 2013, but much has changed in the past year. We are now well past the time for quixotic visions of bipartisanship driven by centrists on both sides of the divide. To read “Manifesto” is to recall a time when Americans could reasonably believe that in spite of bitter partisanship in Washington, Congress could transcend the ideological gap to act on immigration reform, universal background checks, and tax reform. To behave, in short, like statesmen.

If we have learned anything from Eric Cantor’s demise, it’s that the Republican Party is no place for pragmatic centrists. It’s not even a place for relentless partisans who may stray from Republican orthodoxy on an issue or two.

So it’s time to just say it out in the open: The resolution to Washington’s dysfunction is a migration of Independents into the Democratic Party, because there is only one side that seems at all interested in welcoming centrists.

We should first note one of the most fundamental rules of political science: Duverger’s Law. This is the observation, made famous by French sociologist Maurice Duverger, that in winner-take-all two-party systems, voters inevitably gravitate toward one of two major parties. This is because voters do not want to waste their vote on a candidate who will not win. Recall how quickly liberal voters snapped back into the Democratic fold after wasting votes on Ralph Nader in 2000; they know Duverger’s Law well.

Given Duverger’s Law, it would follow that any potential “Centrist Party” would run into institutional obstacles not easily surmounted by even the most popular movement. And even those preaching the gospel of bipartisanship, nonpartisanship, and centrism must accept the reality that the current Republican Party is plainly interested in none of that.

This goes for the 501(c)(4) groups like Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us. If you want Congress to move “FWD” on immigration reform, under what circumstance could you expect a GOP-led House to buck the Tea Party and pass a bill that commands broad bipartisan support?

This also goes for moderate voters, whom Wheelan notes comprised 41 percent of the electorate in 2012.

Wheelan correctly observes that any centrist party should not simply meet both sides halfway on each issue, but rather take the best ideas from both sides. A rational observer, for example, would not conclude that climate change is “probably” happening because Democrats are sure it is, and Republicans are sure it’s not.

He also correctly notes that many Democrats have strayed from sensible policies in favor of myopic political interests. But it simply cannot be said that there is no home for centrists in the Democratic Party.

In fact, several prominent Democrats — including Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) — are on record as supporting school choice. Congress passed free-trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama in 2011 with large numbers of Democratic votes, and President Obama signed them into law. The Obama administration and many of its congressional allies have supported lowering the corporate income tax from 35 percent to 28 percent.

In other words, Democrats often support centrist policies without reprisal. Such apostasy would never be tolerated in the GOP.

Wheelan examines the U.S. Senate in “Manifesto,” and proposes that if moderate members began asserting themselves as independent from their parties, the cogs of Washington may begin to turn again.

“With a mere four or five U.S. Senate seats, the Centrists can deny either traditional party a majority. At that point, the Centrists would be America’s power brokers…good things can start happening again,” Wheelan writes.

He’s right, but who might these four to five senators be? At the moment, they would almost assuredly be Democrats.

Take a look at the vote scoring of the 112th Senate (which ended after the 2012 election,) done by political scientists Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. The NOMINATE scale, an abbreviation for Nominal Three-Step Estimation, is immensely complex, and explaining it is well beyond the scope of this piece. Please accept for a moment that -1 on the scale is the score of the most liberal senator imaginable, and 1 is the most conservative. Zero is the perfect middle.

You may note the slight asymmetry of the distribution. I would mark the area between -0.25 and 0.25 as centrist territory. Thirteen of these centrists were Democrats, and only five were Republicans. Of these five, only Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Susan Collins (R-ME) remain in the 113th Senate. Murkowski, it should be noted, held on to her seat in 2010 only after a miraculous write-in campaign overruled GOP primary voters, who nominated fringe Tea Party candidate Joe Miller.

You might also note that NOMINATE scores President Obama as being as liberal as Senator Dick Lugar (R-IN) was conservative. Obama commands the approval of nearly 80 percent of Democrats, while Lugar was dismissed by GOP voters in favor of a man who believed that “God’s intent” was for women to bear the children of their rapists.

A Pew Research Center poll released this week found that 82 percent of “consistently liberal” respondents said they would like elected officials to make compromises; only 14 percent said they would prefer that elected officials stick to their positions. When offered the same dichotomy, “consistently conservative” respondents said they would prefer elected officials hold fast to their views by a 63 to 32 percent margin.

This Republican intransigence left Thomas E. Mann and Norman Ornstein, two of the most prominent scholars of the Senate, to place the blame for Washington’s dysfunction squarely on the GOP in their 2012 book, It’s Even Worse Than It Looks.

“When one party moves this far from the center of American politics, it is extremely difficult to enact policies responsive to the country’s most pressing challenges,” Mann and Ornstein write.

Of course, we recently had two years of almost unfettered Democratic control in Washington. Was the record of the 111th Congress, which reigned in 2009 and 2010, perfect? Of course not. But it got things done, including passing a markedly centrist health care bill that has expanded coverage to more than 10 million people to date.

It got done because those four or five senators Wheelan speaks of cooperated. Those senators were all Democrats.

On the issues, I have no apparent disagreements with Wheelan. He’s a brilliant author and public policy expert.

But he, and others, has to drop these silly notions of false equivalence. I too hope for a day when Republicans in Washington are ready to rejoin mainstream political thought. But it does no good to pretend that they exist in that space now. And given the message that GOP voters just sent us from Virginia’s 7th congressional district, they aren’t coming back anytime soon.

Until the GOP is ready to return to rationality, centrists are left with no choice but to organize and vote for Democrats, and work within the Democratic Party to advance centrist goals.

Thomas L. Day is an Iraq War veteran and a Defense Council member of the Truman National Security Project. Views expressed are his own.

Photo: TechCrunch via Flickr

Want more political analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World