Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, July 23, 2018

WASHINGTON– If the nation is lucky, this October will mark the beginning of the end of the Tea Party.

It is suffering from extreme miscalculation and a foolish misreading of its opponents’ intentions. This, in turn, has created a moment of enlightenment, an opening to see things that were once missed.

Many Republicans, of course, saw the disaster coming in advance of the shutdown. But they were terrified to take on a movement that is fortified by money, energy and the backing of a bloviating brigade of talk-show hosts. The assumption was that the Tea Party had become invincible inside the GOP.

People who knew better followed Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) down a path of confrontation over Obamacare. Yet even before the shutdown began, Republicans stopped talking about an outright repeal of Obamacare, as House Speaker John Boehner’s ever-changing demands demonstrated.

The extent of the rout was then underscored in the hot microphone incident last week when Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was caught plotting strategy with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). Paul’s words, spoken after he had finished a television interview, said  more than he realized.

“I just did CNN. I just go over and over again: ‘We’re willing to compromise, we’re willing to negotiate,'” Paul said, adding this about the Democrats: “I don’t think they’ve poll tested, ‘We won’t negotiate.'”

Tellingly, Paul described the new GOP line this way: “We wanted to defund it, we fought for that, but now we’re willing to compromise on this.”

It’s revealing to hear a politician who is supposed to be all about principle mocking Democrats for failing to do enough poll testing. It makes you wonder whether Paul poll tests everything he says. But Paul’s statement raised a more important question: If just days after it began, a shutdown that was about repealing Obamacare is not about repealing Obamacare, then what is it about?

Actually, it’s what even conservatives are calling the Seinfeld Shutdown: It’s about absolutely nothing, at least where substance is concerned. Moreover, Paul and his friends need to explain that if they are so devoted to “negotiation,” why didn’t they negotiate long ago? Why did they relentlessly block negotiations over a Senate Democratic budget whose passage, according to a now-discarded pile of  press releases, they once made a precondition for discussions?

Only now can we fully grasp that politics on the right has been driven less by issues than by a series of gestures. And they give up on even these as soon as their foes try to take what they say seriously.