The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Afghan Leaders Gather For Security Debate Amid ‘Apology’ Row


Kabul (AFP) – Afghan tribal leaders gathered Wednesday ahead of a debate on a key security pact with the United States, as a row over an “apology” letter threatened to distract from make-or-break issues of sovereignty.

Tribal chiefs are assembling in Kabul for a grand assembly that will open on Thursday to discuss the deal under which up to 16,000 U.S. troops will remain in Afghanistan after the bulk of NATO forces withdraw by the end of 2014.

The so-called Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) is seen as vital to lasting security in the war-torn nation, where the Taliban insurgency this year reached levels of violence not seen since 2010, according to the U.N.

A similar deal between the U.S. and Iraq collapsed in 2011 over whether American troops would be answerable to local courts or those in the U.S., leading Washington to pull out its forces completely.

The same issue has dogged protracted negotiations with Kabul, leading some to fear the Iraq “zero option” would be repeated and the country would plunge into violence as local forces struggle to quell the Taliban.

Progress appears to have been made on another issue touching on Afghan sovereignty which threatened to derail the BSA — whether U.S. troops will be able to search Afghan homes.

Aimal Faizi, President Hamid Karzai’s spokesman, told reporters in Kabul on Tuesday they had agreed U.S. forces could search homes, but only in “extraordinary circumstances” where there was an urgent risk to life.

Officials in Washington struck a cautionary note, saying there was still some way to go before reaching a final agreement on the pact.

‘Apology’ row

Threatening to overshadow the crucial last steps on the BSA was an unexpected row which blew up late on Tuesday over whether or not the U.S. would apologise for mistakes made during the Afghan war.

U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice told CNN on Tuesday said there was “no need” for Washington to apologise.

Her stern remarks came after Faizi said Karzai expected a letter from President Barack Obama acknowledging U.S. military mistakes during the war and Afghan suffering.

Civilian casualties and incidents such as the accidental burning of Korans in February 2012 have caused huge anger and resentment among Afghans.

U.S. officials said the request for a letter had come from Karzai himself during a phone call with Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday.

Analyst Ahmad Saeedi said that the row was confected to assuage domestic concerns.

“Karzai just wants to show he is a national hero who has been bargaining with the U.S. for national interests till the last moment,” Saeedi said.

The loya jirga has a consultative role and the BSA will also have to be passed by the Afghan parliament.

The Taliban have branded the meeting a U.S.-designed plot, vowing to pursue and punish its delegates as traitors if they approve the BSA.

The BSA will determine how many U.S. soldiers stay in Afghanistan when most of NATO’s troops deployed in the country since 2001 — currently numbering 75,000 — leave at the end of 2014.

Highlighting the ongoing security challenges facing Afghanistan, a Taliban suicide bomber on Saturday struck close to the venue where the meeting is set to be held killing a dozen people, most of them civilians.

AFP Photo/Massoud Hossaini


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ }}