The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Donald Trump’s accounting firm must turn over Trump’s tax returns to a grand jury in New York investigating hush money payments he made to two women ahead of the 2016 election, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.

The three-judge panel on the Second Circuit of Appeals unanimously ruled that Trump is not immune to criminal investigation, as Trump’s lawyers argued, and said that Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars, must hand over his tax returns to the grand jury.

The grand jury was convened by Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who subpoenaed Trump’s tax returns as part of an investigation into the hush money payments.

Trump is all but certain to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

However it’s unclear whether the Supreme Court will hear his appeal. If the Court chooses not to hear Trump’s argument, the appeals court ruling will stand and Mazars will have to turn over the tax returns.

Last month, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., also ruled that Trump’s accounting firm must turn over his tax returns to the House Oversight Committee, which is also investigating Trump’s finances.

That ruling was 2-1, with Trump-appointed judge Neomi Rao siding with Trump in a dissent that relied little on the law and instead on Trump’s reasoning.

Trump’s payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal are at the heart of the grand jury investigation. Both women claim to have had sexual relationships with Trump and say they were paid not to talk about those alleged affairs in the run-up to the 2016 election, when the revelations might have hurt Trump’s campaign.

Trump’s former lawyer and longtime “fixer,” Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty in August 2018 to campaign finance violations in connection with those payments, which he helped facilitate.

Trump repeatedly denied the payments for several months, claiming he knew nothing about them. However, audio recordings later showed him coordinating the payments with Cohen. Trump later changed his story, saying he had known about the payments only later on and had reimbursed Cohen fully.

Unlike all other modern presidents, Trump has patently refused to release his tax returns, claiming they are under audit. Democrats have tried to force his accounting firm to turn over the documents, which they say could yield important information on a number of concerns, including how Trump has profited personally off the presidency.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less

Billionaires

YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}