The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Trump’s role in hush money payments to mistresses prior to the 2016 election could be an impeachable offense, Democrats told the Washington Post on Monday.

The House Judiciary Committee is planning on looking into how Trump directed payments to silence Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels, two of Trump’s mistresses.

“The fingerprints are all over this one — it’s not like a big mystery,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told the Post. “And now it’s left to Congress again to figure out what to do with the lawbreaking and apparent impunity of the president.”

In the lead-up to the 2016 election, Trump directed Michael Cohen, who was at that time his personal attorney and fixer, to arrange hush money payments to both McDougal and Daniels so they would not speak about their affairs with Trump. McDougal was paid $150,000 and Daniels was paid $130,000.

Payments to McDougal went through AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, and amounted to an illegal campaign contribution. Cohen made payments to Daniels, and was reimbursed by the Trump organization, including checks signed by Trump himself.

Trump himself admitted to authorizing the hush money payments in May 2018, saying Cohen arranged for a nondisclosure agreement to be made.

According to Trump’s own Justice Department, this activity was a felony, because the payments were made to influence the 2016 election. Cohen pleaded guilty to arranging the hush money payments in a plea agreement with the Southern District of New York, which was one of the charges that landed him in prison for three years.

In testimony before Congress, Cohen admitted he carried out the hush money payments at the direction of Trump.

In February, Cohen said he “pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with Individual #1. For the record: Individual #1 is President Donald J. Trump.”

The House Judiciary Committee plans on hearings into Trump’s role as soon as October, according to the Post. Witnesses could include AMI employees involved in the scheme.

The investigation is in addition to inquiries about Trump’s obstruction of justice efforts outlined in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. While Mueller laid out evidence of 10 possible instances of obstruction of justice by Trump, the Judiciary Committee is already looking closely into five of them. The hush money payments will be the sixth offense.

The majority of House Democrats want to open an impeachment inquiry into Trump, and a look at Trump’s role in an illegal hush money scheme could provide even more evidence of Trump’s lack of fitness for office.

Published with permission of The American Independent.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mehmet Oz

Youtube Screenshot

Fox News is in attack mode after its own polling showed Republican nominee Mehmet Oz trailing Democratic nominee Lt. Gov. John Fetterman in the Pennsylvania Senate race.

The July 28 Fox News poll showed that Fetterman has an 11-point lead over Oz. Additionally, according to the poll, “just 35 percent of those backing Oz say they support him enthusiastically, while 45 percent have reservations. For Fetterman, 68 percent back him enthusiastically and only 18 percent hesitate.” These results, combined with data showing that Fetterman is outraising and outspending Oz, could spell disaster for the GOP hopeful. However, since this polling, Fox has demonstrated it’s a reliable partner to help Oz try to reset the race.

Keep reading... Show less
Youtube Screenshot

For decades, abortion was the perfect issue for Republicans: one that they could use to energize "pro-life" voters, and one that would be around forever. What's more, they ran little risk of alienating "pro-choice" voters, who had little concern that the GOP would ever be able to repeal abortion rights.

Key to this strategy was the assumption that the Supreme Court would preserve Roe v. Wade. GOP candidates and legislators could champion the anti-abortion cause secure in the knowledge that they would not have to follow through in any major way. They could nibble away at abortion rights with waiting periods and clinic regulations, but the fundamental right endured. And their efforts were rewarded with the steadfast support of a bloc of single-issue voters.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}