The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

7 Republican presidential hopefuls debated in New Hampshire last night, and to the extent that no one landed any direct hits on the frontrunner, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, he took the top prize. The two-time candidate was poised and calm, and even managed to shake off the wooden, archaic mannerisms he sometimes employed in excess in 2007 and 2008; some might say he was positively charming when he pointed out that the Bruins were well ahead in their Stanley Cup game with the Canucks, an easy applause line for the New England audience. More substantively, Romney managed to deftly handle what (mild) barbs were thrown at the universal healthcare plan he passed in his state in 2006, which conservatives deride as a model for Barack Obama’s national healthcare law. Tim Pawlenty, the former Minnesota governor, retreated from his previous attacks on “Obamneycare” (an amalgamation of the derisive epithets Obamacare and Romneycare), and in so doing seemed to cede too much space to his opponent. Michele Bachmann, the right-wing firebrand from suburban Minneapolis, showed evidence of having hired consultants and advisors, and seemed more sane and (somewhat) plausibly presidential than usual.

 

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

A scene from "Squid Game" on Netflix

Reprinted with permission from Responsible Statecraft

The Treasury Department's nine-page "2021 Sanctions Review" released on Monday makes vague recommendations for "calibrating sanctions to mitigate unintended economic, political, and humanitarian impact." Unfortunately, it offers few tangible policy suggestions on how to end the high humanitarian
Keep reading... Show less

Mt.Rushmore

Reprinted with permission from Creators

In New York City, a statue of Thomas Jefferson has graced the City Council chamber for 100 years. This week, the Public Design Commission voted unanimously to remove it. "Jefferson embodies some of the most shameful parts of our country's history," explained Adrienne Adams, a councilwoman from Queens. Assemblyman Charles Barron went even further. Responding to a question about where the statue should go next, he was contemptuous: "I don't think it should go anywhere. I don't think it should exist."

When iconoclasts topple Jefferson, they seem to validate the argument advanced by defenders of Confederate monuments that there is no escape from the slippery slope. "First, they come for Nathan Bedford Forrest and then for Robert E. Lee. Where does it end? Is Jefferson next? Is George Washington?"

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}