The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

For Endorse This today, we need to talk about Donald Trump’s Twitter habits. Not because he’s entertaining, or because his brand of hyper-dramatized realtime performance is like a shot of adrenaline for ratings or clicks.

This man might be running the country.

We’ve written about Trump’s tick for changing his position to fit the exact moment and audience he’s addressing — he’s against taxing the rich in a white paper tax plan meant for GOP insiders, and for it on ABC’s This Week, speaking directly to the Sunday show crowd.

We’ve also written about the outrageous claims he’s made that — even if he is known for switching his position — we must assume are core beliefs of his, if for nothing else than the seriousness of the ideas being proposed: spending tens of billions of dollars on a pointless border wall, banning the world’s second-largest religion, destroying the value of American treasury bonds by trying to “negotiate” payments.

But we should also think about — and will continue to write about — how exactly Donald Trump would operate temperamentally on the world stage. When the cast of the early morning political talk show Morning Joe started criticizing Trump for lashing out at Republican leaders, for example, Trump responded by insulting the hosts of show online — and it wasn’t the first time. In the political and media environment which informs our lives and our votes, this is itself a political act.

Imagine Vladimir Putin in Joe Scarborough’s place — or David Cameron, or Angela Merkel, or Raul Castro, or, for that matter, Mitch McConnell, or Tim Cook, or Ban Ki-moon.

Will this man be the executive and diplomatic voice of the federal government? Will he have nuclear weapons and the NSA at his fingertips?

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, left, and former President Donald Trump.

Photo by Kevin McCarthy (Public domain)

In the professional stratum of politics, few verities are treated with more reverence than the outcome of next year's midterm, when the Republican Party is deemed certain to recapture majorities in the House and Senate. With weary wisdom, any pol or pundit will cite the long string of elections that buttress this prediction.

Political history also tells us that many factors can influence an electoral result, including a national crisis or a change in economic conditions — in other words, things can change and even midterm elections are not entirely foretold. There have been a few exceptions to this rule, too.

Keep reading... Show less