Type to search

Fake News Outlets Push Putin’s Response To Charges Of 2016 Russian Interference

Far Right Featured Post Media Politics Russia Top News White House

Fake News Outlets Push Putin’s Response To Charges Of 2016 Russian Interference

Share
Russia

Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters.

Fake news purveyors are citing Russian President Vladimir Putin to claim that, contrary to the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions, Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election.

On June 4, NBC aired Putin’s interview with new host Megyn Kelly, in which he claimed he hadn’t seen “any direct proof of Russian interference in the presidential election.” He also suggested that American intelligence agencies could have fabricated evidence of hacking, saying, “There’s a theory that [President John F.] Kennedy’s assassination was arranged by the United States intelligence services.” Putin made similar remarks two days earlier during a panel discussion, which Kelly moderated, at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, saying, “There is no specific evidence, no facts, just assumptions, allegations and conclusions based on those allegations nothing more.” However, U.S. intelligence agencies have all concluded “with high confidence” that Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election to help President Donald Trump win, in part by hacking Democratic groups and individuals and by using bots to spread fake news and pro-Trump stories on social media.

Fake news purveyors jumped on the interviews, praising Putin and calling the idea that Russia interfered in the election “a nonsensical theory” and “allegations that are continuously being spewed out of the mouths of the Left.” Others cited Putin to call the intelligence community’s conclusions, noted by Kelly in the interview, “absurd Russian hacking claims,” “stupid talking points,” a “clearly bogus narrative,” “Hillary Clinton campaign talking points,” and “a line of questioning that sounded as though it came straight out of the Democrat-media complex conspiracy handbook.”

This praise for Putin’s remarks follows the repeated denial by these outlets — which regularly function as pro-Trump propaganda outlets — that there could be any connection between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Their framing of the issue is similar to reporting from Russian outlets RT and Sputnik, which simply parroted Putin’s highly dubious claims.

 

Tags:

2 Comments

  1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth June 6, 2017

    While we’re trying to get the investigation underway into Trump’s despicable snuggling up to a despot like Putin, it may be wise to investigate Megyn Kelly’s possible ties to Russia.

    Many at FOX. the Wash. Post, and elements at NY Times and other formerly reputable media outlets, give all the appearance of active 5th columnists at work in plain sight.

    Now that Putin has weighed in on his innocence, he expects us to rest assured that he is completely innocent. That’s like Nixon saying he didn’t authorize Watergate snooping and that he wasn’t a crook, or the KKK in a photo of a lynching saying they didn’t do it—all of whom are such reliable and doughty “Christians”, and supposedly still are, and who would never engage in lying and dissembling.

    Reply
    1. dpaano June 8, 2017

      Personally, I wouldn’t trust Megyn Kelly as far as I could throw her!

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.